Skip to main content
Log in

Non-commuters: the people who walk to work or work at home

  • Published:
Transportation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The paper focuses on the socioeconomic characteristics of workers at home and those who walk to work and these are compared with commuters (those who travel to work by motorized transportation). Understanding of such characteristics of these people is useful for purposes of designing policies that encourage these forms of "travel" to work, if it is believed desirable for planning or environmental purposes. For example, subsidizing public transportation may also have an impact on the proclivity to work at home or walk to work. Using a large census data set for Israel, separate subsamples are analyzed for heads of household and for their spouses. Metropolitan areas as well as peripheral urbanized areas are analyzed separately. Logit analysis is used to identify those variables that affect the likelihood of different groups of people to walk to work or to work at home.It is shown that walkers to work tend to be lower-income, less-educated people with lower asset ownership rates. Females are overrepresented amongst them, while "high-status" professionals are underrepresented. Workers at home appear to be a more complex group. They tend to have higher levels of education and wealth than commuters, but earn less on average. They include proportionately more females. The likelihood of working at home increases with home size and with ownership of some durable goods. The workers at home may in fact be comprised of two or more differing groups with contrasting characteristics, one higher-income and higher-educated, the other with lower socio-economic indicators. Because they may be a heterogeneous group, development of planning policies to encourage non-vehicle commuting may require different policy tools for the different subgroups.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Brewer AM & Hensher DA (2000) Distributed work and travel behavior: the dynamics of interactive agency choices between employers and employees. Transportation 27(1) (February): 117-148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chamberland D (1997) Housing and communities for a changing workforce. Urban Design, Telecommuting and Travel Forecasting Conference, Williamsburg, VI.

  • Department of Environment, Transport and the Regions (1998) Transport Statistics Great Britain 1998. Stationery Office, Publications Center, London, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deming WG (1984) Work at home: data from the CPS. Monthly Labor Review (February), 14-20.

  • Eash R (1999) Destination and mode choice models for nonmotorized travel. Transportation Research Record (1674): 1-8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank LD & Pivo G (1994) Impacts of mixed use and density on utilization of three modes of travel. Transportation Research Record (1466): 44-52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerstein P, Marlor D, Brail S, Keyes J & Mulla Z (1995) Planning for telework and home-based employment: a Canadian survey on integrating work into residential environments. Center for Future Studies in Housing and Living Environments.

  • Gomez-Ibanez JA (1991) A global view of automobile dependence. Journal of the American Planning Association 57(3).

  • Hamer R, Kroes E & Van Ooststroom H (1991) Teleworking in the Netherlands: an evaluation of changes in travel behavior. Transportation 18(4): 365-382.

    Google Scholar 

  • Handy SL (1993) Regional versus local accessibility: neo-traditional development and its implications for non-work travel. Built Environment 28(4): 253-267.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanson S & Hanson P (1982) The travel-activity patterns of urban residents: dimensions and relationships to sociodemographic characteristics. Economic Geography 57: 179-202.

    Google Scholar 

  • JALA Associates, Inc. (1990) California Telecommuting Pilot Project Final Report, #7540-930-1400-0, California Department of General Services, North Highlands, CA, June.

  • Kennedy P (1981) Estimation with correctly interpreted dummy variables in semilogarithmic equations. American Economic Review 71(4) (September): 801ff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitamura R, Nilles J, Fleming D & Conroy P (1990) Telecommuting as a transportation planning measure: initial results of State of California Pilot Project. Transportation Research Record 1285: 98-104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knight D & Williams R (1999) Green travel plans. Traffic Engineering and Control 40(1): 22-23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin MR (1997) Goodbye Uglyville, Hello Paradise: Telecommuting and Urban Development Patterns. Urban Design. Telecommuting and Travel Forecasting Conference, Williamsburg, VI.

  • Mokhtarian PL (1991) Telecommuting and travel: state of the practice, state of the art. Transportation 18: 319-342.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mokhtarian PL & Henderson DK (1998) Analyzing the travel behavior of home-based workers in the 1991 CALTRANS statewide travel survey. Journal of Transportation and Statistics 1(3) (October): 25-41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pendyala RM, Goulias KG & Kitamura R (1991) Impact of telecommuting on spatial and temporal patterns of household travel. Transportation 18(4): 383-409.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pratt JH (1993) Myths and Realities of Working at Home: Characteristics of Homebased Business Owners and Telecommuters. US Small Business Administration, June.

  • Salomon I (1986) Telecommunications and Travel Relationships: A Review. Transportation Research 20A(3): 223-238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salomon I and Ben-Akiva M (1983) The use of the life-style concept in travel demand models. Environment and Planning A 15: 623-638.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scottish Office Central Research Unit (1999) “Research on Walking,” monograph, Edinburgh, Scotland.

  • Shriver K (1997) Influence of environmental design on pedestrian travel behavior in four Austin neighborhoods. Transportation Research Record (1578): 64-75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steiner R (1999) Residential density and travel patterns: review of the literature. Transportation Research Record (1466): 37-43

    Google Scholar 

  • Stundenmund AH (1997) Using Econometrics: A Practical Guide, 3rd ed., Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yen JR (2000) Interpreting employee telecommuting adoption: an economic perspective. Transportation 27(1) (February): 149-164.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Plaut, P.O. Non-commuters: the people who walk to work or work at home. Transportation 31, 229–255 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:PORT.0000016459.21342.9d

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:PORT.0000016459.21342.9d

Navigation