Skip to main content
Log in

The Dilemma of Privatized Public Services: Philosophical Frames in Understanding Failure and Managing Partnership Terminations

  • Published:
Public Organization Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper uses social theory to explicate the competing perspectives on the on-going and, increasing, privatization of public services in the U.K. It suggests that if business ignores these perspectives then political imperatives will come into play that will inevitably turn privatization initiatives commercially sour.

Contrary to political rhetoric, public/private partnerships (PPPs) constitute a more strategic form and process of out-sourcing, demanding that wherever public funding flows, private “rent-seeking” opportunities be created for the private sector. Seen in these terms, managerial elites will need to understand and anticipate conditions under which the state would seek to terminate lucrative partnering arrangements in the public interest.

Political–administrative dialogue on partnerships can involve an unresponsive discourse or a dialogue of the deaf, both constituting a threat to business through the imposition of undefined community service obligations or hostile and unprofitable terminations by the state. Performance required of PPPs goes beyond market success and requires co-optation of strategic stakeholders, raising significant issues about corporate governance directions. Business leaders will need to develop communicative rationalities that build pluralized decision structures and implementation capacities. The paper concludes by outlining design features of more effective regulatory regimes to avoid hostile and unprofitable terminations of increasingly contested PPPs. The conclusion is less sanguine about the ability, or even the wish, of governments to do so.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Archer, M.S. (1995). Realist Social Theory: A Morphogenetic Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arrow, K.J. (1985). “The Economics of Agency.” In J.W. Pratt and R.J. Zeckhauser (eds.), Principals and Agents: The Structure of Business. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press, pp. 37–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baert, P. (1998). Social Theory in the Twentieth Century. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, B. (1974). Scientific Knowledge and Sociological Theory. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berle, A.A., and G.C. Means. (1932/1991). The Modern Corporation and Private Property. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bentham, J. (1789/1970). An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation. London: Athlone.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhaskar, R. (1998). The Possibility of Naturalism: A Philosophical Critique of the Contemporary Human Sciences, 3rd Edition. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blumer, H. (1969). Symbolism Interactionism: Perspective and Method. New York: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1998). Practical Reason. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breton, A. (1974). The Economic Theory of Representative Government. Chicago, IL: Atherton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cutting, B.A., and A. Kouzmin. (1999). “From Chaos to Patterns of Understanding: Reflections on the Dynamics of Effective Decision Making.” Public Administration 77(3), 473–508.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cutting, B.A., and A. Kouzmin. (2000). “The Emerging Patterns of Power in Corporate Governance: Back to the Future in Improving Corporate Decision Making.” Journal of Managerial Psychology 15(5), 477–507.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cutting, B.A., and A. Kouzmin. (2001). “Formulating a Metaphysics of Governance: Explaining the Dynamics of Governance Using the New JEWEL Synthesis Framework.” Journal of Management Development 20(6), 526–564.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cutting, B.A., and A. Kouzmin. (2002). “Evaluating Corporate Board Cultures and Decision Making.” Corporate Governance: An International Journal of Effective Board Performance 2(2), 27–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Alessi, L. (1983). “Property Rights, Transaction Costs and X-efficiency.” American Economic Review 73(1), 64–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, J. (2002). Responses to Governance: The Governing of Corporations, Societies and the World. Westport, CT: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, J., and R. Dogan. (2002). “Hierarchies, Networks and Markets: Responses to Societal Governance Failures.” Administrative Theory and Praxis 24(1) (March), 175–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, J., and R. Dogan. (2003). “Toward Constructive Corporate Governance: From ‘Internal’ Certainties to a Plurality Principle,” Reason in Practice: The Journal of Philosophical Management 2(3) (March), 51–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, J., and M. Hyde (eds.) (2001). The Marketization of Social Security. Westport, CT: Quorum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, J., and A. Kouzmin. (1994). “The Commercialization of the Australian Public Sector: Competence, Elitism or Default in Management Education?” The International Journal of Public Sector Management 7(6), 52–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, J., and A. Kouzmin. (2001a). “The Privatization of Social Security: Governance Challenges to Partnership Provision.” The Asian Review of Public Administration XIII(1) (January–June), 54–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, J., and A. Kouzmin. (2001b). “The Market Appropriation of Statutory Social Security: Global Experiences and Governance Issues.” In J. Dixon and M. Hyde (eds.), The Marketization of Social Security. Westport, CT: Quorum, pp. 27–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, J., A. Kouzmin., and N. Korac-Kakabadse. (1998). “Managerialism-Something Old, Something Borrowed, Little New: Economic Prescription Versus Effective Organizational Change in Public Agencies.” The International Journal of Public Sector Management 11(2/3), 164–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dryzek, J.S. (1987). “Complexity and Rationality in Public Life.” Political Studies 35(3), 424–442.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, R.A. (1985). Takings: Private Property Under the Power of Eminent Domain. Boston: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farazmand, A. (2002). “Globalization, Privatization and the Future of Governance: A Critical Assessment.” Public Finance and Management 2(1), 125–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fay, B. (1975). Social Theory and Political Practice. London: Allen and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fellow, K., and M. Kelaher. (1991). “Managing Government the Corporate Way.” Australian Accountant 61(3), 22–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feyerabend, P.K. (1976). Against Method. New York: Humanities Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finer, H. (1941). “Administrative Responsibility in Democratic Government.” Public Aministration Review 1(4), 335–350.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flam, H. (1990). “‘Emotional Man 2’: Corporate Actors as Emotion-Motivated Emotion Managers.” International Sociology 5(2), 225–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedrich, C.J. (1940). “Public Policy and the Nature of Administrative Responsibility.” In C.J. Friedrich and E.S. Mason (eds.), Public Policy: A Yearbook of the Graduate School of Public Administration. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, pp. 3–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1984). The Constitution of Society. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1993). New Rules of Sociological Method: A Positive Critique of Interpretative Sociologies, 2nd Edition. Stanford, CA: Stanford University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, R.A. (1973). “Environmental Knowledge and Organizational Time Horizons: Some Functions and Dysfunctions.” Human Relations 26(2), 54–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Groenwegan, P. (1990). “Market Ideology and Public Sector Efficiency: Introduction to Symposium on the Market and the State.” Australian Journal of Public Administration 49(2), 95–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1968). Knowledge and Human Interest. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1971). Towards a Rational Society. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1975). Legitimation Crisis. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1984). The Theory of Communicative Action, Volume 1. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1986). “Hannah Arnedt's Communications Concept of Power.” In S. Lukes (ed.), Power. New York: New York University Press, pp. 75–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1987). The Theory of Communicative Action, Volume 2. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1996). Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. Oxford: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hertz, N. (2001). “Why We Must Stay Silent No Longer.” The Observer. Retrieved from nysiwgy://23// http://www.smh.com.a....ary/o105/01/A39422-2001, Apr 30, html.

  • Hirschman, A.O. (1991). The Rhetoric of Reaction: Perversity, Futility, Jeopardy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollis, M. (1994). The Philosophy of Social Science: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horton, R.D. (1987). “Expenditures, Services and Public Management.” Public Administration Review 47(5), 378–384.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howe, L.E. (2002). “Administrative Law and Governmentality: Politics and Discretion in a Changing State of Sovereignty.” Administrative Theory and Praxis 24(1), 55–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutton, W. (1995). The State We're In. London: Jonathan Cape.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, J., and A. Kouzmin. (1998). “Who are the Rent Seekers?: From the Ideological Attack on Public Officials to the ‘Pork Barrel’ Par Excellence—Privatization and Out-Sourcing as Oligarchic Corruption.” Administrative Theory and Praxis 20(4) (December), 491–507.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman, H. (1981). “Fear of Bureaucracy: A Raging Pandemic.” Public Administration Review 41(1), 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kingdom, J. (1991). Government and Politics in Britain. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knorr-Cetina, K.D. (1981). The Manufacture of Knowledge: An Essay on the Constructivist and Contextual Nature of Science. Oxford: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kouzmin, A. (2002). “The New Political Economy of the Smart State: Transitions in Governance Capacities—An Editorial.” Administrative Theory and Praxis 24(1), 25–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kouzmin, A., J. Dixon, and N. Korac-Kakabadse. (2001). “From Self-Referential Economics to Managerialism and the ‘Economic Holocaust’ of Down-Sizing/Re-Engineering: A Global Reckoning Begins?” In K. Thorne and G. Turner (eds.), Global Business Regulation: Some Research Perspectives. Frenchs Forest, NSW: Prentice-Hall, pp. 1–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kouzmin, A., and A.M.G. Jarman. (1999). “De-Institutionalising ‘Group Think’: From State Welfarism and Towards Cyber-Netizenship in the ‘smart’ State.” Administrative Theory and Praxis 21(4), 474–484.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kouzmin, A., and A.M.G. Jarman. (2002). “From Welfare and Contract States: Towards ‘smart State’ Policy Capacities.” In J.S. Jun (ed.), Rethinking Administative Theory: The Challenge of the Century. Westport, CT: Praeger, pp. 233–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kouzmin, A., N. Korac-Kakabadse, and A.M.G. Jarman. (1996). “Economic Rationalism, Risk and Institutional Vulnerability.” Risk, Decision and Policy 1(2) (December), 229–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kouzmin, A., R. Leivesley, and N. Korac-Kakabadse. (1997). “From Managerialism and Economic Rationalism: Towards ‘Re-Inventing’ Economic Ideology and Administrative Diversity.” Administrative Theory and Praxis 19(1), 19–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T.S. (1970). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 2nd Edition. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • La Porte, T.D. (1996). “High Reliability Organizations: Unlikely, Demanding and At Risk.” Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management 4(20), 60–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lott, J.R. Jr. (1987). “The Effect of Non-Transferable Property Rights on the Efficiency of Political Markets.” Journal of Public Economics 32(2), 231–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacPherson, M.S. (1984). “On Shelling, Hirschman and Sen: Revisiting the Conception of The Self.” Partisan Review 51(2), 236–247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Margolis, H. (1982). Selfishness, Altruism and Rationality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mouzelis, N. (1989). “Restructuring Structuration Theory.” Sociological Review 37(4) (November), 613–635.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, J. (2000). Structuration. Buckingham: Open University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, W. (1995). Public Policy: An Introduction to the Theory and Practice of Policy Analysis. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, B.G., and D.J. Savoie. (eds.) (1998). Taking Stock: Assessing Public Sector Reforms. Montreal: Canadian Center for Management Development and the McGill-Queen's University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K.R. (1962/1968). Conjectures and Refutations. New York: Harper Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prasser, S. (1990). “Reforming the Public Sector: Strategies for Change.” In A. Kouzmin and N. Scott (eds.), Dynamics in Australian Public Management: Selected Essays. Melbourne: Macmillan, pp. 185–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reich, R.B. (2001). “Taking Care of Business.” The American Prospect (April 9), 48.

  • Rein, M., and D.A. Schön. (1993). “Reframing Policy Discourse.” In F. Fischer and J. Forester (eds.), The Argumentative Turn in Policy Analysis and Planning. London: UCL Press, pp. 145–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal, U. (1990). “Politics and Administration: Max Weber and the Quest for Democratic Order.” In A. Kouzmin and N. Scott (eds.), Dynamics in Australian Public Management: Selected Essays. Melbourne: Macmillan, pp. 392–408.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schultz, A. (1932/1967). The Phenomenology of the Social World. Evanston, IL: North Western University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. (1957a). Administrative Behavior. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. (1957b). Models of Man. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz, J.E. (2002). “Globalism's Discontents.” The American Prospect (Winter), A16–A21.

  • Storey, J. (1993). An Introductory Guide to Cultural Theory in Popular Culture. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, R.W. (1984). “The Politics of Efficiency and Effectiveness in the British Civil Service.” International Review of Administrative Science 50(3), 239–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vickers, M.H., and A. Kouzmin. (2001). “‘Resilience’ in Organizational Actors and Re-articulating ‘Voice’: Towards a Humanistic Critique of New Public Management.” Public Management Review 3(1) (March), 95–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weimer, D.L. (1992). “The Craft of Policy Design: Can It Be More Than an Art?” Policy Studies Review 11(3/4) (Autumn/Winter), 370–388.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wendt, A. (1999). Social Theory in International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wholey, J.S. (1993). “Evaluation and Performance.” Australian Accountant 63(11), 28–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilenski, P. and R.E. Goodin. (1986). “Beyond Efficiency: The Logical Underpinnings of Administrative Principles.” In P. Wilenski (ed.), Public Power and Public Administration. Hale and Iremonger in association with the Royal Australian Institute of Public Administration, Sydney, pp. 64–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winch, P. (1990). The Idea of Social Science and its Relation to Philosophy, 2nd Edition. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, K. (1977). “Values in the Policy Process.” Policy and Politics (Special Issue on Urban Policy in Britain: Influence, Processes and Impacts) 5(3) (March), 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zorn, C.K. (1989). “The Economic Perspective on Public Administration.” Public Administration Review 49(2), 213–214.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dixon, J., Dogan, R. & Kouzmin, A. The Dilemma of Privatized Public Services: Philosophical Frames in Understanding Failure and Managing Partnership Terminations. Public Organization Review 4, 25–46 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:PORJ.0000015650.68779.89

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:PORJ.0000015650.68779.89

Navigation