Abstract
This paper uses social theory to explicate the competing perspectives on the on-going and, increasing, privatization of public services in the U.K. It suggests that if business ignores these perspectives then political imperatives will come into play that will inevitably turn privatization initiatives commercially sour.
Contrary to political rhetoric, public/private partnerships (PPPs) constitute a more strategic form and process of out-sourcing, demanding that wherever public funding flows, private “rent-seeking” opportunities be created for the private sector. Seen in these terms, managerial elites will need to understand and anticipate conditions under which the state would seek to terminate lucrative partnering arrangements in the public interest.
Political–administrative dialogue on partnerships can involve an unresponsive discourse or a dialogue of the deaf, both constituting a threat to business through the imposition of undefined community service obligations or hostile and unprofitable terminations by the state. Performance required of PPPs goes beyond market success and requires co-optation of strategic stakeholders, raising significant issues about corporate governance directions. Business leaders will need to develop communicative rationalities that build pluralized decision structures and implementation capacities. The paper concludes by outlining design features of more effective regulatory regimes to avoid hostile and unprofitable terminations of increasingly contested PPPs. The conclusion is less sanguine about the ability, or even the wish, of governments to do so.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Archer, M.S. (1995). Realist Social Theory: A Morphogenetic Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Arrow, K.J. (1985). “The Economics of Agency.” In J.W. Pratt and R.J. Zeckhauser (eds.), Principals and Agents: The Structure of Business. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press, pp. 37–54.
Baert, P. (1998). Social Theory in the Twentieth Century. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Barnes, B. (1974). Scientific Knowledge and Sociological Theory. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Berle, A.A., and G.C. Means. (1932/1991). The Modern Corporation and Private Property. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
Bentham, J. (1789/1970). An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation. London: Athlone.
Bhaskar, R. (1998). The Possibility of Naturalism: A Philosophical Critique of the Contemporary Human Sciences, 3rd Edition. London and New York: Routledge.
Blumer, H. (1969). Symbolism Interactionism: Perspective and Method. New York: Prentice Hall.
Bourdieu, P. (1998). Practical Reason. Cambridge: Polity.
Breton, A. (1974). The Economic Theory of Representative Government. Chicago, IL: Atherton.
Cutting, B.A., and A. Kouzmin. (1999). “From Chaos to Patterns of Understanding: Reflections on the Dynamics of Effective Decision Making.” Public Administration 77(3), 473–508.
Cutting, B.A., and A. Kouzmin. (2000). “The Emerging Patterns of Power in Corporate Governance: Back to the Future in Improving Corporate Decision Making.” Journal of Managerial Psychology 15(5), 477–507.
Cutting, B.A., and A. Kouzmin. (2001). “Formulating a Metaphysics of Governance: Explaining the Dynamics of Governance Using the New JEWEL Synthesis Framework.” Journal of Management Development 20(6), 526–564.
Cutting, B.A., and A. Kouzmin. (2002). “Evaluating Corporate Board Cultures and Decision Making.” Corporate Governance: An International Journal of Effective Board Performance 2(2), 27–45.
De Alessi, L. (1983). “Property Rights, Transaction Costs and X-efficiency.” American Economic Review 73(1), 64–81.
Dixon, J. (2002). Responses to Governance: The Governing of Corporations, Societies and the World. Westport, CT: Praeger.
Dixon, J., and R. Dogan. (2002). “Hierarchies, Networks and Markets: Responses to Societal Governance Failures.” Administrative Theory and Praxis 24(1) (March), 175–196.
Dixon, J., and R. Dogan. (2003). “Toward Constructive Corporate Governance: From ‘Internal’ Certainties to a Plurality Principle,” Reason in Practice: The Journal of Philosophical Management 2(3) (March), 51–72.
Dixon, J., and M. Hyde (eds.) (2001). The Marketization of Social Security. Westport, CT: Quorum.
Dixon, J., and A. Kouzmin. (1994). “The Commercialization of the Australian Public Sector: Competence, Elitism or Default in Management Education?” The International Journal of Public Sector Management 7(6), 52–73.
Dixon, J., and A. Kouzmin. (2001a). “The Privatization of Social Security: Governance Challenges to Partnership Provision.” The Asian Review of Public Administration XIII(1) (January–June), 54–68.
Dixon, J., and A. Kouzmin. (2001b). “The Market Appropriation of Statutory Social Security: Global Experiences and Governance Issues.” In J. Dixon and M. Hyde (eds.), The Marketization of Social Security. Westport, CT: Quorum, pp. 27–42.
Dixon, J., A. Kouzmin., and N. Korac-Kakabadse. (1998). “Managerialism-Something Old, Something Borrowed, Little New: Economic Prescription Versus Effective Organizational Change in Public Agencies.” The International Journal of Public Sector Management 11(2/3), 164–187.
Dryzek, J.S. (1987). “Complexity and Rationality in Public Life.” Political Studies 35(3), 424–442.
Epstein, R.A. (1985). Takings: Private Property Under the Power of Eminent Domain. Boston: Harvard University Press.
Farazmand, A. (2002). “Globalization, Privatization and the Future of Governance: A Critical Assessment.” Public Finance and Management 2(1), 125–153.
Fay, B. (1975). Social Theory and Political Practice. London: Allen and Unwin.
Fellow, K., and M. Kelaher. (1991). “Managing Government the Corporate Way.” Australian Accountant 61(3), 22–23.
Feyerabend, P.K. (1976). Against Method. New York: Humanities Press.
Finer, H. (1941). “Administrative Responsibility in Democratic Government.” Public Aministration Review 1(4), 335–350.
Flam, H. (1990). “‘Emotional Man 2’: Corporate Actors as Emotion-Motivated Emotion Managers.” International Sociology 5(2), 225–242.
Friedrich, C.J. (1940). “Public Policy and the Nature of Administrative Responsibility.” In C.J. Friedrich and E.S. Mason (eds.), Public Policy: A Yearbook of the Graduate School of Public Administration. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, pp. 3–24.
Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Giddens, A. (1984). The Constitution of Society. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Giddens, A. (1993). New Rules of Sociological Method: A Positive Critique of Interpretative Sociologies, 2nd Edition. Stanford, CA: Stanford University.
Goodman, R.A. (1973). “Environmental Knowledge and Organizational Time Horizons: Some Functions and Dysfunctions.” Human Relations 26(2), 54–65.
Groenwegan, P. (1990). “Market Ideology and Public Sector Efficiency: Introduction to Symposium on the Market and the State.” Australian Journal of Public Administration 49(2), 95–97.
Habermas, J. (1968). Knowledge and Human Interest. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
Habermas, J. (1971). Towards a Rational Society. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
Habermas, J. (1975). Legitimation Crisis. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
Habermas, J. (1984). The Theory of Communicative Action, Volume 1. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
Habermas, J. (1986). “Hannah Arnedt's Communications Concept of Power.” In S. Lukes (ed.), Power. New York: New York University Press, pp. 75–93.
Habermas, J. (1987). The Theory of Communicative Action, Volume 2. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
Habermas, J. (1996). Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. Oxford: Polity Press.
Hertz, N. (2001). “Why We Must Stay Silent No Longer.” The Observer. Retrieved from nysiwgy://23// http://www.smh.com.a....ary/o105/01/A39422-2001, Apr 30, html.
Hirschman, A.O. (1991). The Rhetoric of Reaction: Perversity, Futility, Jeopardy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Hollis, M. (1994). The Philosophy of Social Science: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Horton, R.D. (1987). “Expenditures, Services and Public Management.” Public Administration Review 47(5), 378–384.
Howe, L.E. (2002). “Administrative Law and Governmentality: Politics and Discretion in a Changing State of Sovereignty.” Administrative Theory and Praxis 24(1), 55–80.
Hutton, W. (1995). The State We're In. London: Jonathan Cape.
Johnston, J., and A. Kouzmin. (1998). “Who are the Rent Seekers?: From the Ideological Attack on Public Officials to the ‘Pork Barrel’ Par Excellence—Privatization and Out-Sourcing as Oligarchic Corruption.” Administrative Theory and Praxis 20(4) (December), 491–507.
Kaufman, H. (1981). “Fear of Bureaucracy: A Raging Pandemic.” Public Administration Review 41(1), 1–9.
Kingdom, J. (1991). Government and Politics in Britain. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Knorr-Cetina, K.D. (1981). The Manufacture of Knowledge: An Essay on the Constructivist and Contextual Nature of Science. Oxford: Pergamon.
Kouzmin, A. (2002). “The New Political Economy of the Smart State: Transitions in Governance Capacities—An Editorial.” Administrative Theory and Praxis 24(1), 25–30.
Kouzmin, A., J. Dixon, and N. Korac-Kakabadse. (2001). “From Self-Referential Economics to Managerialism and the ‘Economic Holocaust’ of Down-Sizing/Re-Engineering: A Global Reckoning Begins?” In K. Thorne and G. Turner (eds.), Global Business Regulation: Some Research Perspectives. Frenchs Forest, NSW: Prentice-Hall, pp. 1–37.
Kouzmin, A., and A.M.G. Jarman. (1999). “De-Institutionalising ‘Group Think’: From State Welfarism and Towards Cyber-Netizenship in the ‘smart’ State.” Administrative Theory and Praxis 21(4), 474–484.
Kouzmin, A., and A.M.G. Jarman. (2002). “From Welfare and Contract States: Towards ‘smart State’ Policy Capacities.” In J.S. Jun (ed.), Rethinking Administative Theory: The Challenge of the Century. Westport, CT: Praeger, pp. 233–252.
Kouzmin, A., N. Korac-Kakabadse, and A.M.G. Jarman. (1996). “Economic Rationalism, Risk and Institutional Vulnerability.” Risk, Decision and Policy 1(2) (December), 229–256.
Kouzmin, A., R. Leivesley, and N. Korac-Kakabadse. (1997). “From Managerialism and Economic Rationalism: Towards ‘Re-Inventing’ Economic Ideology and Administrative Diversity.” Administrative Theory and Praxis 19(1), 19–42.
Kuhn, T.S. (1970). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 2nd Edition. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.
La Porte, T.D. (1996). “High Reliability Organizations: Unlikely, Demanding and At Risk.” Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management 4(20), 60–71.
Lott, J.R. Jr. (1987). “The Effect of Non-Transferable Property Rights on the Efficiency of Political Markets.” Journal of Public Economics 32(2), 231–246.
MacPherson, M.S. (1984). “On Shelling, Hirschman and Sen: Revisiting the Conception of The Self.” Partisan Review 51(2), 236–247.
Margolis, H. (1982). Selfishness, Altruism and Rationality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mouzelis, N. (1989). “Restructuring Structuration Theory.” Sociological Review 37(4) (November), 613–635.
Parker, J. (2000). Structuration. Buckingham: Open University.
Parsons, W. (1995). Public Policy: An Introduction to the Theory and Practice of Policy Analysis. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Peters, B.G., and D.J. Savoie. (eds.) (1998). Taking Stock: Assessing Public Sector Reforms. Montreal: Canadian Center for Management Development and the McGill-Queen's University Press.
Popper, K.R. (1962/1968). Conjectures and Refutations. New York: Harper Row.
Prasser, S. (1990). “Reforming the Public Sector: Strategies for Change.” In A. Kouzmin and N. Scott (eds.), Dynamics in Australian Public Management: Selected Essays. Melbourne: Macmillan, pp. 185–199.
Reich, R.B. (2001). “Taking Care of Business.” The American Prospect (April 9), 48.
Rein, M., and D.A. Schön. (1993). “Reframing Policy Discourse.” In F. Fischer and J. Forester (eds.), The Argumentative Turn in Policy Analysis and Planning. London: UCL Press, pp. 145–166.
Rosenthal, U. (1990). “Politics and Administration: Max Weber and the Quest for Democratic Order.” In A. Kouzmin and N. Scott (eds.), Dynamics in Australian Public Management: Selected Essays. Melbourne: Macmillan, pp. 392–408.
Schultz, A. (1932/1967). The Phenomenology of the Social World. Evanston, IL: North Western University Press.
Simon, H. (1957a). Administrative Behavior. New York: Free Press.
Simon, H. (1957b). Models of Man. New York: Wiley.
Stiglitz, J.E. (2002). “Globalism's Discontents.” The American Prospect (Winter), A16–A21.
Storey, J. (1993). An Introductory Guide to Cultural Theory in Popular Culture. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
Thomas, R.W. (1984). “The Politics of Efficiency and Effectiveness in the British Civil Service.” International Review of Administrative Science 50(3), 239–251.
Vickers, M.H., and A. Kouzmin. (2001). “‘Resilience’ in Organizational Actors and Re-articulating ‘Voice’: Towards a Humanistic Critique of New Public Management.” Public Management Review 3(1) (March), 95–119.
Weimer, D.L. (1992). “The Craft of Policy Design: Can It Be More Than an Art?” Policy Studies Review 11(3/4) (Autumn/Winter), 370–388.
Wendt, A. (1999). Social Theory in International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wholey, J.S. (1993). “Evaluation and Performance.” Australian Accountant 63(11), 28–33.
Wilenski, P. and R.E. Goodin. (1986). “Beyond Efficiency: The Logical Underpinnings of Administrative Principles.” In P. Wilenski (ed.), Public Power and Public Administration. Hale and Iremonger in association with the Royal Australian Institute of Public Administration, Sydney, pp. 64–73.
Winch, P. (1990). The Idea of Social Science and its Relation to Philosophy, 2nd Edition. London: Routledge.
Young, K. (1977). “Values in the Policy Process.” Policy and Politics (Special Issue on Urban Policy in Britain: Influence, Processes and Impacts) 5(3) (March), 1–22.
Zorn, C.K. (1989). “The Economic Perspective on Public Administration.” Public Administration Review 49(2), 213–214.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dixon, J., Dogan, R. & Kouzmin, A. The Dilemma of Privatized Public Services: Philosophical Frames in Understanding Failure and Managing Partnership Terminations. Public Organization Review 4, 25–46 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:PORJ.0000015650.68779.89
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:PORJ.0000015650.68779.89