Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Naturalization of U.S. Immigrants: Highlights from Ten Countries

  • Published:
Population Research and Policy Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The saga of U.S. immigrant naturalization is merely sketched for about 25 million immigrants entered in three decades of renewed immigration. This study documents naturalization outcomes for immigrants from ten major countries of origin, using administrative records on immigrants and naturalizations. Following the 1978–1987 admission cohorts for the first decade or more of permanent residence, this study finds significant covariate effects on the timing of naturalization by origin, mode of entry, and immigrant visa class, net other influences of demographic and background characteristics. Immigrants from the Philippines, Vietnam, and China naturalized more quickly than immigrants from India, Korea, Cuba, Colombia, Jamaica, the Dominican Republic, and Mexico. Those who adjusted from statuses as nonimmigrants, refugees, or asylees became naturalized citizens more quickly. Those immigrants with employment sponsorship naturalized faster than family-sponsored immigrants. Spouses of citizens, spouses of permanent residents, spouses of siblings of citizens, and spouses of sons and daughters of citizens naturalized faster than some other immigrants. Gender was not significant in the multivariate analysis, but further research will more fully explore sex-specific variation in the timing of naturalization given likely variation in women's representation by origin and admission categories.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allison, P. D. (1995), Survival analysis using the SAS system: A practical guide. Cary, N.C.: SAS Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aguirre, B. E. & Saenz, R. (2002), Testing the effects of collectively expected durations of migration: The naturalization of Mexicans and Cubans, International Migration Review. 36: 103–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Astone, N., Nathanson, C., Schoen, R. & Kim, Y. J. (1999), Family demography, social theory, and investment in social capital, Population and Development Review 25: 1–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bagchi, A. D. (2001), Migrant networks and the immigrant professional: An analysis of the role of weak ties, Population Research and Policy Review 9–31.

  • Bean, F. D., Hook, J. V. & Woodrow-Lafield, K. A. (2001a), Estimates of numbers of unauthorized migrants residing in the United States: The total, Mexican, and non-Mexican Central American unauthorized populations in mid-2001, Special Report, November 2001, Pew Hispanic Center (www.pewhispanic.org).

  • Bean, F. D., Corona, R., Tuirán, R. & Woodrow-Lafield, K. A., Hook, J. V. (2001b), Circular, invisible, and ambiguous migrants: Components of difference in estimates of the number of unauthorized Mexican migrants in the United States, Demography 38(3): 411–422.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bean, F. D., Corona, R., Tuirán, R. & Woodrow-Lafield, K. A. (1998), The quantification of migration between Mexico and the United States, pp. 1–90 in Binational Migration Study, Migration between Mexico and the United States: Binational study, Volume I, Thematicchapters, U.S. Commission on Immigration Reform and Mexican Ministry of ForeignAffairs. Available from <http://www.utexas.edu/lbj/uscir/binpapers/v1–1bean.pdf>.

  • Bean, F. D., Chapa, J., Berg, R. R. & Sowards, K. A. (1994), Educational and sociodemographic incorporation among Hispanic immigrants to the United States, pp. 73–100 in B. Edmonston & J.S. Passel (eds.), Immigration and ethnicity: The integration of America's newest arrivals Washington, D.C.: Urban Institute Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berk, R. A. (1983), An introduction to sample selection bias in sociological data, American Sociological Review 4: 386–398.

    Google Scholar 

  • Binational Migration Study (1997), Migration between Mexico and the United States: Binational study. U.S. Commission on Immigration Reform and Mexican Ministry of Foreign Affairs.

  • Blossfeld, H., Hamerle, A. & Mayer, K. U. (1989), Event history analysis: Statistical theory and application in the social sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borjas, G. (1999), Heaven's door: Immigration policy and the American economy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bustamante, J., Jasso, G., Taylor, J. E. & Trigueros Legarreta, P. (1998), Characteristics of migrants: Mexicans in the United States, pp. 91–162 in Binational Migration Study, Migration between Mexico and the United States: Binational study, Volume 1, Thematic chapters. U.S. Commission on Immigration Reform and Mexican Ministry of Foreign Affairs. Available from <http://www.utexas.edu/lbj/uscir/binpapers/v1–2bust.pdf>

  • Chiswick, B. R. & Sullivan, T. A. (1995), The new immigrants, pp. 211–270 in R. Farley (ed.), State of the union: America in the 1990s, Volume two: Social trends. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, X., Hatton, T. J. & Williamson, J. G. (2002), Where do U.S. immigrants come from, and why? NBERWorking Paper No. 8998, National Bureau of Economic Research, presented at the 2002 annual meeting of the Population Association of America, Atlanta.

  • Cox, D. R. (1972), Regression models and life tables, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B34: 187–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, D. R. & Oakes, D. (1984), Analysis of survival data. London: Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crimmins, E. M. (1993), Demography: The past 30 years, the present, and the future, Demography 30: 579–592.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dauvergne, C. (2000), Citizenship, migration laws and women: Gendering permanent residency statistics, Melbourne University Law Review 24: 18.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Jong, G. & Legazpi Blair, M. C. (1994), Changing occupational characteristics of U.S. immigrants, Asian and Pacific Migration Journal 3: 567–588.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeSipio, L. (1987), Social science literature and the naturalization process, International Migration Review 21: 390–405.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeSipio, L. & de la Garza, R. O. (1998), Making Americans, remaking America: Immigration & immigrant policy Westview Press.

  • Donato, K. M. (1992), Understanding U.S. immigration: Why some countries send women and others send men, pp. 141–148 in D. Gabaccia (ed.), Seeking common ground: Multidisciplinary studies of immigrant women in the United States. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Espenshade, T. (ed.) (1994), A stone's throw from Ellis Island. University Press of America.

  • Fix, M. & Passel, J. S. (1994), Immigration and immigrants: Setting the record straight. Washington, D.C.: Urban Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, C. & Lennon, E. (1999), Historical census statistics on the foreign-born population of the United States: 1850 to 1990. Working Paper No. 29, Population Division, U.S. Census Bureau.

  • Greenwood, M. J. & McDowell, J. M. (1999), Legal U.S. immigration: Influences on gender, age, and skill composition. Kalamazoo, MI: W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood, M. J., Waldman, D. M. & Zahniser, S. S. (1999), The influence of social programs in source countries on various classes of U.S. immigration, Journal of the American Statistical Association 94: 64–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood, M. J. & Waldman, D. M. (1996), A model of the skill composition of U.S. immigration, Applied Economics 28: 299–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood, M. J. & Ziel, F. A. (1997), The impact of the Immigration Act of 1990 on U.S. immigration.

  • Greenwood, M. J., McDowell, J. M. & Trabka, E. (1991), Conducting descriptive and analytic research with the Immigration and Naturalization Service public-use tapes, Journal of Economic and Social Measurement 17: 131–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschman, C., Kasinitz, P. & De Wind, J. (eds.) (1999), The handbook of international migration: The American experience. New York: Russell Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Houstoun, M. F., Kramer, R. G. & Barrett, J. M. (1984), Female predominance in immigration to the United States since 1930: A first look, International Migration Review 18: 908–963.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jasso, G. (1997), Migration and the dynamics of family phenomena, pp. 63–78 in A. Booth A. C. Crouter, and N. Landale, Immigration and the family: research and policy on U.S. immigrants. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum & Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jasso, G. & Rosenzweig, M. R. (1982), Estimating the emigration rates of legal immigrants using administrative and survey data: The 1971 cohort of immigrants to the United States, Demography 19: 279–290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jasso, G. & Rosenzweig, M. R. (1986), Family reunification and the immigration multiplier: U.S. immigration law, origin-country conditions, and the reproduction of immigrants, Demography 23: 291–312.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jasso, G. & Rosenzweig, M. R. (1988), How well do U.S. immigrants do? Vintage effects, emigration selectivity, and occupational mobility, pp. 229–253 in T. P. Schultz (ed.), Research in Population Economics, Volume 6.

  • Jasso, G. & Rosenzweig, M. (1990), The new chosen people: Immigrants in the United States. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jasso, G. & Rosenzweig, M. (1995), Do immigrants screened for skills do better than family reunification immigrants? International Migration Review 29: 85–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jasso, G., Rosenzweig, M.R & Smith, J. P. (1998), The changing skill of new immigrants to the United States: Recent trends and their determinants. Working Paper 6764. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research. Available from <(http://www.nber.org/papers/W6764)>.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jasso, G., Massey, D. S., Rosenzweig, M. R. & Smith, J. P. (1997), The New Immigrant Survey (NIS) pilot study: Preliminary results. Revised version of paper presented at the 1997 Joint Meeting of the Public Health Conference on Records and Statistics and the Data Users Conference, Washington, D.C., July.

  • Jasso, G., Massey, D. S., Rosenzweig, M. R. & Smith, J. P. (2000a), The New Immigrant Survey Pilot (NIS-P): Overview and new findings about U.S. legal immigrants at admission, Demography 37: 127–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jasso, G., Massey, D. S., Rosenzweig, M. R. & Smith, J. P. (2000b), Assortative mating among married legal immigrants to the United States: Evidence from the New Immigrant Pilot Survey, International Migration Review 34: 443–460.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones-Correa, M. (2001), Under two flags: Dual nationality in Latin America and its consequences for the United States, International Migration Review 35: 997–1029.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones-Correa, M. (1998), Different paths: Gender, immigration, and political participation, International Migration Review 32: 0326–0349.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanjanapan, W. (1995), The immigration of Asian professionals to the United States: 1988–1990, International Migration Review 29: 7–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraly, E. P. & Warren, R. (1991), Long-term immigration to the United States: New approaches to measurement, International Migration Review 25: 60–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraly, E. P. & Warren, R. (1992), Estimates of long-term immigration to the United States: Moving U.S. statistics toward United Nations concepts, Demography 29: 613–626.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levine, D. B., Hill, K. & Warren, R. (1985), Immigration statistics: A story of neglect. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liang, Z. (1994), On the measurement of naturalization, Demography 31: 525–548.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, J., Ong, P. M. & Rosenstein, C. (1991), Dual chain migration: Post-1965 Filipino immigration to the United States, International Migration Review 25: 487–513.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindstrom, D. P. & Massey, D. S. (1994), Selective emigration, cohort quality, and models of immigrant assimilation, Social Science Research 23: 315–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lobo, A. P. & Salvo, J. J. (1998), Changing U.S. immigration law and the occupational selectivity of Asian immigrants, International Migration Review 32: 0737–0760.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lobo, A. P. & Salvo, J. J. (2000), Resurgent Irish immigration to the US in the 1980s and early 1990s: A socio-demographic profile, International Migration 36: 257–280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Massey, D. S. (1995), The new immigration and ethnicity in the United States, Population and Development Review 21: 631–652.

    Google Scholar 

  • Massey, D. S. & Malone, N. (2002), Pathways to legal immigration, Population Research and Policy Review 21: 473–504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Massey, D., Alarcon, R., Durand, J. & Gonzalez, H. (1987), Return to Aztlan: The social process of international migration from western Mexico. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Massey, D. S., Arango, J., Hugo, G., Kouaouci, A., Pellegrino, A. & Taylor, J. E. (1998), Worlds in motion: Understanding international migration at the end of the millenium. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nee, V. & Alba, R. (1999), Rethinking assimilation theory for a new era of immigration, pp. 137–160 in C. Hirschman, P. Kasinitz, & J. DeWind (eds.), The handbook of international migration: The American experience. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Passel, J. S. & Clark, R. (1997), How many naturalized citizens are there? An assessment of data quality in the decennial census and CPS, Presented at the annual meeting of the Population Association of America, Washington, D.C.

  • Passel, J. S., Clark, R. L. & Fix, M. (1998), Naturalization and other current issues in U.S. immigration Intersections of data and policy, pp. 1–10 in Proceedings of the-Social/Government Statistics Section, American Statistical Association, 1997 Joint Statistical Meetings.

  • Renshon, S. (2000), Dual citizens in America: An issue of vast proportions and broad significance. Washington, D.C.: Center for Immigration Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renshon, S. (2001), Dual citizenship and American national identity: A dilemma of Diversity. Washington, D.C.: Center for Immigration Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, B. R. (1995), Socially expected durations and the economic adjustment of immigrants, pp. 42–86 in A. Portes (ed.), The economic sociology of immigration. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, R. G., Hummer, R. A. & Nam, C. B. (1999), Living and dying in the USA. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rumbaut, R. (1995), The crucible within: Ethnic identity, self-esteem, and segmented assimilation among children of immigrants, International Migration Review 28: 748–794.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rytina, N. (1998), The timing of naturalization in the U.S. through 1996: The experience of the legal immigrant cohorts of 1977 and 1982. Revised presentation at the annual meeting of the Population Association of America, Chicago, March 1998. Working Paper No. 98–01, Statistics Office, U.S. Immigration and Naturalization Service, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salvo, J. & Ortiz, R. (1992), The newest New Yorkers: An analysis of immigration into New York City during the 1980s. DCP #92–16. June.

  • Schmidley, A. D. (2001), Profile of the foreign-born population in the United States: 2000. U.S. Census Bureau, Current Population Reports, Special Studies, P3–206. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidley, A. D. & Gibson, C. (1999), Profile of the foreign-born population in the United States: 1997. U.S. Census Bureau, Current Population Reports, Special Studies, P23–195. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer, A., Friedman, S., Cheung, I. & Price, M. (2001), The world in a zip code: Greater Washington, D.C. as a new region of immigration. April. Washington: Center on Urban & Metropolitan Policy, The Brookings Institution.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, J. P. & Edmonston, B. (eds.) (1997), The new Americans: Economic, demographic, and fiscal effects of immigration. Panel on the Demographic and Economic Impacts of Immigration, Committee on Population and Committee on National Statistics, National Research Council. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spiro, P. J. (1999), Embracing dual nationality. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, International Migration Policy Program, Washington, D.C.

  • Tilly, C. (1990), Transplanted networks, pp. 79–95 in V. Yans-McLaughlin (ed.), Immigration reconsidered: History, sociology, and politics. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tienda, M. (2002), Demography and the social contract. Demography 39: 587–616.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuma, N. & Hannan, M. (1984), Social dynamics: Models and methods. New York.

  • Tyree, A. & Donato, K. M. (1985), The sex composition of legal immigrants to the United States, Sociology and Social Research 69: 577–589.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Bureau of the Census (1975), Historical statistics of the United States, colonial times to 1970. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Homeland Security. 2002 Yearbook of immigration statistics. Office of Immigration Statistics. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. General Accounting Office (1999), Public assistance benefits provided to recently naturalized citizens. GAO/HEHS–99–102. June 1999. Washington, D.C.

  • U.S. General Accounting Office (2001), Record linkage and privacy: Issues in creating new federal research and statistical information. GAO–01–126SP.

  • U.S. Immigration and Naturalization Service (2000), Adjudications update – Second quarter, FY 2000. INS Backgrounder, May 26.

  • U.S. Immigration and Naturalization Service (1998), 1996 Statistical Yearbook of the U.S. Immigration and Naturalization Service. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government PrintinOffice.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Immigration and Naturalization Service (1999), 1997 Statistical Yearbook of the U.S. Immigration and Naturalization Service. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Immigration and Naturalization Service. n.d., Documentation package for the 1977 immigrant-naturalization cohort. Statistics Division, Washington, D.C.

  • U.S. Immigration and Naturalization Service. n.d., Documentation package for the 1982 immigrant-naturalization cohort. Statistics Division, Washington, D.C.

  • Wachter, K. (1985), The imputation and treatment of missing data, pp. 251–254 in D.B. Levine, K. Hill, & R. Warren (eds.), Immigration statistics: A story of neglect. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weintraub, S. (1998), On the unrenounceability of Mexican nationality, pp. 1249–1250 in Mexico–United States Binational Migration Study, Migration between Mexico and the United States: Binational Study, Volume 2, Research reports and background materials. Mexican Ministry of Foreign Affairs and U.S. Commission on Immigration Reform. Available from <http://www.utexas.edu/lbj/uscir/binpapers>.

  • Woodrow, K. A. (1992), A consideration of the effect of immigration reform on the number of undocumented residents in the United States, Population Research and Policy Review 11: 117–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodrow, K. A. & Passel, J. S. (1990), Post-IRCA undocumented immigration to the United States: Assessment based on the June 1988 CPS, Chapter 2, in F. D. Bean, B. Edmonston, & J. S. Passel (eds.), Undocumented migration to the United States: IRCA and the experience of the 1980s. Washington, D.C.: Urban Institute Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodrow-Lafield, K. A. (1995), Potential sponsorship by IRCA-legalized immigrants. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Commission on Immigration Reform. Available from <http://www.utexas.edu/lbj/uscir/respapers/ps-s94>.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodrow-Lafield, K. A. (1998), To dream of American citizenship and family unification: The long welcome, pp. 11–19 in Proceedings of the Social/Government Statistics Section, American Statistical Association, 1997 Joint Statistical Meetings.

  • Woodrow-Lafield, K. A. (1996), Demographic effects of legalization. Working Paper, Bureau of International Labor Affairs, Division of Immigration Policy and Research, U.S. Department of Labor, Based on Final Report (revised March 1995).

  • Woodrow-Lafield, K. A. (1998), Estimating authorized immigration, pp. 619–682, in Mexico–United States Binational Migration Study, Migration between Mexico and the United States: Binational study, Volume 2, Research reports and background materials, Mexican Ministry of Foreign Affairs and U.S. Commission on Immigration Reform. Available from <http://www.utexas.edu/lbj/uscir/binpapers/v2a-5woodrow.pdf>.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodrow-Lafield, K. A., Xu, X., Kersen, T. & Poch, B. (2001), Naturalization experiences of U.S. immigrants, pp. 106–111 in Proceedings of the Social/Government Statistics Section, American Statistical Association, 2000 Joint Statistical Meetings.

  • Woodrow-Lafield, K. A., Xu, X., Kersen, T. & Poch, B. (1999), Naturalization for 1982 and 1987 Mexican immigrant cohorts. Revised version of paper presented at the 1999 annual meeting of the Southern Demographic Association, San Antonio.

  • Yang, P. Q. (1994), Explaining immigrant naturalization, International Migration Review 28: 449–477.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zelinsky, W. (1971), The hypothesis of the mobility transition, Geographical Review 61: 219–249.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Notre Dame, USA

    Karen A. Woodrow-Lafield

  2. Mississippi State University, USA

    Xiaohe Xu & Thomas Kersen

  3. University of Chicago, USA

    Bunnak Poch

Authors
  1. Karen A. Woodrow-Lafield
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Xiaohe Xu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Thomas Kersen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Bunnak Poch
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Woodrow-Lafield, K.A., Xu, X., Kersen, T. et al. Naturalization of U.S. Immigrants: Highlights from Ten Countries. Population Research and Policy Review 23, 187–218 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:POPU.0000034097.35915.e1

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:POPU.0000034097.35915.e1

Search

Navigation