Abstract
If social scientists are to provide a more useful contribution to international debates over population and environment, we must find ways to combine the insights of our competing theoretical traditions. Political economy, rational choice, and cultural institutionalist perspectives are each associated with a different assessment and characterization of the population “problem”, as well as divergent strategies of response, prioritizing in turn the goals of equity, efficiency, and cultural identity. The principal argument of this paper is that these three perspectives, and the goals which they embody, are like the three legs of a stool; none is sufficient and each is necessary to uphold socially acceptable responses to population growth in the context of broader challenges of sustainability. Each perspective is reviewed in turn, distinguishing narrow and polarizing applications that trivialize the way social and economic systems rely on the natural environment from applications that are useful in fashioning a more integrated approach. The paper concludes with reflections on how this approach may support and enrich a focus on sustainable livelihoods in development planning.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Agrawal, A. & Gibson, C.C. (1999). Enchantment and disenchantment: The role of community in natural resource conservation, World Development 27(4): 629–649.
Arizpe, L., Stone, M.P. & Major, D.C. (1994). Conclusions: Rethinking the population-environment debate, pp. 339–347, in L. Arizpe, M.P. Stone & D.C. Major (eds.), Population and Environment: Rethinking the Debate. Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press.
Arizpe, L. & Velázquez, M. (1994). The social dimensions of population, pp. 15–40, in L. Arizpe, M.P. Stone & D. C. Major (eds.), Population and Environment: Rethinking the Debate. Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press.
Arrow, K., Bolin, B., Costanza, R., Dasgupta, P., Folke, C., Holling, C.S., Jansson, B.-O., Levin, S., Mäler, K.-G., Perrings, C. & Pimentel, D. (1995). Economic growth, carrying capacity, and the environment, Science 268: 520–521.
Atoh, M. (2000). The current state of world population: A north-south contrast, Asia-Pacific Review 7(2): 121–135.
Bandarage, A. (1997). Women, population and global crisis: A political-economic analysis. London: Zed Books.
Bengtsson, T. & Gunnarsson, C. (1994). Population, development, and institutional change: Summary and analysis, pp. 1–23, in K. Lindahl-Kiessling & H. Landberg (eds.), Population, economic development, and the environment. New York: Oxford University Press.
Bledsoe, C. (1994). ‘Children are like young bamboo trees’: Potentiality and reproduction in sub-Saharan Africa, pp. 105–138, in K. Lindahl-Kiessling & H. Landberg (eds.), Population, economic development, and the environment. New York: Oxford University Press.
Bok, S. (1994). Population and ethics: Expanding the moral space, pp. 15–26, in G. Sen, A. Germain & L.C. Chen (eds.), Population policies reconsidered: Health, empowerment, and rights. Boston: Harvard University Press.
Brown, L., Gardner, G. & Halweil, B. (1999). Beyond Malthus: Nineteen dimensions of the population challenge. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.
Dasgupta, P., Folke, C. & Mäler, K.-G. (1994). The environmental resource base and human welfare, pp. 25–50, in K. Lindahl-Kiessling & H. Landberg (eds.), Population, economic development, and the environment. New York: Oxford University Press.
Diamond, J. (2001). Public lecture at Conference on Environment, Evolution and Experience, April 11. University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.
Easterlin, R.A. (1996). Growth triumphant: The twenty-first century in historical perspective. Ann Arbor, Michigan: University of Michigan Press.
Ehrlich, P.R. (1968). The population bomb. New York: Ballantine Books.
Engelman, R. (1998). Human population prospects, pp. 47–77, in N. Polunin (ed.), Population and global security. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Geertz, C. (1984). Culture and social change: The Indonesian case, Man 19: 511–532.
Harvey, D. (1974). Population, resources, and the ideology of science, Economic Geography 50(3): 256–77.
Hirschman, A.O. (1998). Population pressures and development, pp. 57–62, in P. Demeny & G. McNicoll (eds.), The reader in population and development. New York: St. Martin's Press.
Homer-Dixon, T.F. (1999). Environment, scarcity, and violence. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
Johnson, D.G. (2000). Population, food, and knowledge, American Economic Review 90(1): 1–14.
Lohmann, L. (1999). Forest cleansing: Racial oppression in scientific nature conservation. (The Corner House Briefing Report No. 13, pp. 1–24).
McCay, B.J. & Jentoft, S. (1998). Market or community failure? Critical perspectives on common property research, Human Organization 57(1): 21–29.
Ratner, B.D. (2004). ‘sustainability’ as a dialogue of values: Challenges to the sociology of development. Sociological Inquiry 74(1), in press.
Sanitsuda Ekachai. (1998). Finding solutions to war is not easy, Bangkok Post, April 30.
Scott, J.C. (1998). Seeing like a state: How certain schemes to improve the human condition have failed. New Haven, Connecticut: Yale University Press.
Seckler, D., Molden, D. & Barker, R. (1998). Water scarcity in the twenty-first century. Colombo, Sri Lanka: International Water Management Institute.
Sen, A. (1994). Population and reasoned agency: Food, fertility, and economic development, pp. 51–78, in K. Lindahl-Kiessling & H. Landberg (eds.), Population, economic development, and the environment. New York: Oxford University.
Simon, J. (1981). The ultimate resource. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
Singh, J.S. (1998). Creating a new consensus on population: The international conference on population and development. London: Earthscan.
Vitousek, P., Mooney, H.A., Lubchenco, J. & Melillo, J. (1997). Human domination of earth's ecosystems, Science 277: 494–499.
Wilmoth, J.R. & Ball, P. (1995). Arguments and action in the life of a social problem: A case study of ‘overpopulation’, 1946–1990, Social Problems 42(3): 318–341.
World Commission on Environment and Development (1987). Our common future. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
World Resources Institute (2000). World resources 2000–2001. Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ratner, B.D. Equity, efficiency, and identity: Grounding the debate over population and sustainability. Population Research and Policy Review 23, 55–71 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:POPU.0000019911.10534.0f
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:POPU.0000019911.10534.0f