Population and Environment

, Volume 25, Issue 4, pp 377–390 | Cite as

Unintended Population Consequences of Policies

  • Barbara A. Anderson


Unintended population consequences of policies stem from three sources: (1) A policy overshoots its original goal; (2) different policies conflict, so that the implementation of one policy inhibits implementation of another policy; (3) negative consequences of a policy are unforeseen, or are anticipated but judged unlikely to be severe or considered less important than the positive aims of the policy. Examples from Singapore, South Africa, Italy, the U.S., and the former Soviet Union are discussed.

population policy fertility migration 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Apps, P., & Rees, R. (2001). Fertility, female labor supply and public policy, a paper presented at the European Society for Population Economics, June 5, Bilbao.Google Scholar
  2. Bernhardt, E. (1993). Fertility and employment. European Sociological Review, 9, 25–42.Google Scholar
  3. Chesnais, J.-C. (1996). Fertility, family, and social policy in contemporary Western Europe. Population and Development Review, 22, 729–739.Google Scholar
  4. Cheung, P. (1998). Singapore. In Asian Population and Development Association, Comparative study of population policies in Asia-Focus on eight Asian countries. Tokyo: Asian Population and Development Association, pp. 155–160.Google Scholar
  5. Cornelius, W. A. (2001). Death at the border: Efficacy and unintended consequences of US immigration control policy. Population and Development Review, 27, 661–685.Google Scholar
  6. Crush, J. (1999). The discourse and dimensions of irregularity in post-apartheid South Africa. International Migration, 37.Google Scholar
  7. Defosses, H. (1981). Pro-natalism in Soviet law and propaganda. In H. Defosses (Ed.), Soviet population policy: Conflicts and constraint (pp. 95–123). New York: Pergamon.Google Scholar
  8. Del Boca, D. (2002). Do child care costs affect labor supply? Paper ChilD n. 18/2002, Torino: Centre for Household, Income, Labour and Demographic Economics.Google Scholar
  9. Del Boca, D., Locatelli, M., & Vuri, D. (2003). Child care choices by Italian households. Paper ChilD n. 30/2003, Torino: Centre for Household, Income, Labour and Demographic Economics.Google Scholar
  10. Fawcett, J. T. (1979). Singapore's population policies in perspective. In P. Chen & J. Fawcett (Eds.), Public policy and population change in Singapore (pp. 3–17). New York: The Population Council.Google Scholar
  11. Fawcett, J. T., & Khoo, S.-E. (1980). Singapore: Rapid fertility transition in a compact society. Population and Development Review, 6, 549–579.Google Scholar
  12. Heer, D. (1977). Three issues in Soviet population policy. Population and Development Review, 3, 229–252.Google Scholar
  13. Jones, E., & Grupp, F. (1987). Modernization, value change and fertility in the Soviet Union. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Jones, R., & Brayfield, A. (1997). Life's greatest joy?: European attitudes toward the centrality of Children. Social Forces 75, 1239–1269.Google Scholar
  15. Lee, S. M., Alvarez, G., & Palen, J. J. (1991). Fertility decline and pronatalist policy in Singapore. International Family Planning Perspectives 17, 73, 65–69.Google Scholar
  16. Lowell, B. L., Teachman, J. & Zhongren Jing. (1995). Unintended consequences of immigration reform: Discrimination and Hispanic employment. Demography 32, 617–628.Google Scholar
  17. Neville, W. (1978). The birth rate in Singapore. Population Studies, 32, 113–133.Google Scholar
  18. Rindfuss, R. & Brewster, K. L. (1996). Childrearing and fertility. Population and Development Review, Fertility in the United States: New Patterns, New Theories, (Supplement 22), 258–289.Google Scholar
  19. Saasa, O. (1996). Migration and the brain drain. In G. Maasdorp (Ed.), Can South and Southern Africa Become Globally Competitive Economies? London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  20. Saw, S.-H. (1975). Singapore: Resumption of rapid fertility decline in 1973. Studies in Family Planning, 6, 166–169.Google Scholar
  21. Saw, S.-H. (1985). New population policies for more balanced procreation. Contemporary Southeast Asia, 17, 2.Google Scholar
  22. main.asp}. accessed March 6, 2004.Google Scholar
  23. Skilling, H., & Griffiths, F. (1971). Interest groups in Soviet politics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  24. South Africa (2002). Immigration Act. No. 13. Pretoria: Author.Google Scholar
  25. South Africa, Department of Home Affairs (1999). White Paper on International Migration. Pretoria: Author.Google Scholar
  26. South African Institute of Race Relations (2001). South Africa Survey 2000/01. Johannesburg: Author.Google Scholar
  27. Southern African Migration Project (2000a). Writing xenophobia: Immigration and the press in post-apartheid South Africa (Migration Policy Series No. 17). Kingston, Ontario, Canada: Author.Google Scholar
  28. Southern African Migration Project (2000b). The brain gain: Skilled migrants and immigration policy in post-apartheid South Africa (Migration Policy Series No. 20). Kingston, Ontario, Canada: Author.Google Scholar
  29. Southern African Migration Project (2001a). The South African White Paper on international migration: An analysis and critique (Migration Policy Brief No. 1). Kingston, Ontario, Canada: Author.Google Scholar
  30. Southern African Migration Project (2001b). The new South African immigration bill: A legal analysis (Migration Policy Brief No. 2). Kingston, Ontario, Canada: Author.Google Scholar
  31. Southern African Migration Project (2001c). Immigration, xenophobia and human rights in South Africa (Migration Policy Series No. 22). Kingston, Ontario, Canada: Author.Google Scholar
  32. Southern African Migration Project (2002). Thinking about the brain drain in southern Africa (Migration Policy Brief No. 8). Kingston, Ontario, Canada: Author.Google Scholar
  33. Sundstrom, M, & Stafford, F. (1991). Female labor force participation, fertility, and public policy, Stockholm Research Report in Demography, No. 63, Stockholm University.Google Scholar
  34. Treas, J., & Widmer, E. (2000). Married women's employment over the life course: Attitudes in cross-national perspective. Social Forces, 78, 1409–1436.Google Scholar
  35. United Nations (2001). World Population Prospects The 2000 Revision. Volume I: Comprehensive tables. New York: Author.Google Scholar
  36. United States Government Accounting Office (1990). Immigration reform: Employer sanctions and the question of discrimination. Washington, D.C.: Author.Google Scholar
  37. Weber, C., & Goodman, A. (1981). The demographic policy debate in the USSR. Population and Development Review, 7, 279–295.Google Scholar
  38. Zakharov, S. & Ivanova, E.(1996). Fertility decline and recent changes in Russia: On the threshold of the second demographic transition. In J. DaVanzo (Ed.), Russia's demographic crisis (pp. 36–82). Santa Monica, CA.: RAND.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Human Sciences Press, Inc. 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Barbara A. Anderson
    • 1
  1. 1.Population Studies CenterUniversity of MichiganAnn Arbor

Personalised recommendations