Advertisement

Political Behavior

, Volume 25, Issue 4, pp 313–337 | Cite as

When to Tell? : Disclosure of Concealable Group Membership, Stereotypes, and Political Evaluation

  • Ewa A. Golebiowska
Article

Abstract

Although their group membership is normatively irrelevant to vote choice, members of politically underrepresented groups (e.g., women, nonwhites, and gays and lesbians) are often evaluated through the prism of their group memberships and related stereotypes when competing for elective office. Because membership in groups defined by gender, race, or ethnicity is easily perceptible, women and nonwhite candidates may have little control over the political effects of their group membership. Membership in groups defined by a candidate's sexual orientation is concealable, in contrast, and thus potentially gives gay and lesbian candidates some control over the impact of their homosexuality and accompanying stereotypes on voters' responses. Using an experimental design, I examine the relationships between timing of group membership disclosure, group stereotypes, candidate sex, and political responses to gay and lesbian candidates for office—taking into consideration voters' attitudes toward homosexuality and their sex.

gay and lesbian candidates candidate evaluation electoral choice timing of group membership disclosure 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Anderson, Norman H. (1965). Averaging versus adding as a stimulus-combination rule in impression formation. Journal of Experimental Psychology 70: 394–400.Google Scholar
  2. Anderson, Norman H. (1981). Foundations of Information Integration Theory. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  3. Ansolabehere, Stephen, Behr, Roy, and Iyengar, Shanto (1993). The Media Game: American Politics in the Television Age. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  4. Asch, Solomon (1946). Forming impressions of personality. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 41: 258–290.Google Scholar
  5. Brewer, Marilynn B. (1988). A dual-process model of impression formation. In Thomas K. Srull and Robert S. Wyer (eds. ), Advances in Social Cognition: A Dual-Process Model of Impression Formation, pp. 1–36. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  6. Chen, Mark, and Bargh, John (1997). Nonconscious behavioral confirmation processes: the self-fulfilling consequences of automatic stereotype activation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 33: 541–560.Google Scholar
  7. Deaux, Kay, and Lewis, Laurie R. (1984). Structure of gender stereotypes: Interrelationships among components and gender label. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 46: 991–1004.Google Scholar
  8. Dennis, Martin J., and Ahn, Woo-Kyoung (2001) Primacy in causal strength judgments: the effect of initial evidence for generative versus inhibitory relationships. Memory and Cognition 29(1): 152–164.Google Scholar
  9. Devine, Patricia G. (1989). Stereotypes and prejudice: their automatic and controlled components. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 56: 5–18.Google Scholar
  10. Fiske, Susan T., and Neuberg, Steven L. (1990). A continuum model of impression formation, from category-based to individuating processes: influences of information and motivation on attention and interpretation. In Mark P. Zanna (ed. ), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 23: 1–74, New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  11. Gay and Lesbian Victory Fund (1999). Executive summary: Gay and Lesbian Victory Foundation National Educational Research Project. Washington, DC: The Feldman Group, Inc.Google Scholar
  12. Gibson, James L. (1987). Freedom and tolerance in the United States. Computer file. Chicago: University of Chicago National Opinion Research Center.Google Scholar
  13. Goffman, Erving (1963). Stigma: Notes on the Management of Spoiled Identity. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
  14. Golebiowska, Ewa A. (2000). The etiology of individual-targeted intolerance: group stereotypes and judgments of individual group members. Political Psychology 21: 443–464.Google Scholar
  15. Golebiowska, Ewa A. (2001a). Group stereotypes in political evaluation. American Politics Research 29: 535–565.Google Scholar
  16. Golebiowska, Ewa A. (2001b). Individual-targeted tolerance and timing of group membership disclosure. The Journal of Politics 63: 1017–1040.Google Scholar
  17. Golebiowska, Ewa A. (2002). Political implications of group stereotypes: campaign experiences of openly gay political candidates. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 32: 590–607.Google Scholar
  18. Golebiowska, Ewa A., Miller, Penny, and Riggle, Ellen (2003). Newspaper coverage of ‘openly’ gay and lesbian candidates: election 2000. Manuscript under review.Google Scholar
  19. Golebiowska, Ewa A., and Thomsen, Cynthia J. (1999). Dynamics of attitudes towards openly gay and lesbian political candidates. In Ellen Riggle and Barry Tadlock(eds. ), Gays and Lesbians in the Democratic Process. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Herek, Gregory M. (2000). Sexual prejudice and gender: Do heterosexuals' attitudes toward lesbians and gay men differ? Journal of Social Issues 56(2): 251–266.Google Scholar
  21. Herek, Gregory M. (2002). Gender gaps in public opinion about lesbians and gay men. Public Opinion Quarterly 66: 40–66.Google Scholar
  22. Herek, Gregory M., and Capitanio, John P. (1996). ‘some of my best friends’: inter-group contact, concealable stigma, and heterosexuals' attitudes toward gay men and lesbians. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 22: 412–424.Google Scholar
  23. Herrick, Rebekah, and Thomas, Sue (1999). The effects of sexual orientation on citizen perceptions of candidate viability. In Ellen Riggle and Barry Tadlock(eds. ), Gays and Lesbians in the Democratic Process, pp. 170–191. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Huddy, Leonie, and Terkildsen, Nayda (1993a). The consequences of gender stereotypes for women candidates at different levels and types of office. Political Research Quarterly 46: 503–525.Google Scholar
  25. Huddy, Leonie, and Terkildsen, Nayda (1993b). Gender stereotypes and the perception of male and female candidates. American Journal of Political Science 37: 119–147.Google Scholar
  26. Jones, Edward E. (1990). Interpersonal Perception. New York: Freeman.Google Scholar
  27. Kahn, Kim (1996). The Political Consequences of Being a Woman: How Stereotypes Influence the Conduct and Consequences of Political Campaigns. New York: Colum bia University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Kite, Mary E. (1994). When perceptions meet reality: individual differences in reac tions to lesbians and gay men. In Beverly Greene and Gregory M. Herek(eds. ), Lesbian and Gay Psychology: Theory, Research, and Clinical Applications, pp. 25–53. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
  29. Kite, Mary E., and Whitley, Bernard E., Jr. (1996). Sex differences in attitudes toward homosexual persons, behaviors, and civil rights: a meta-analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 22: 336–353.Google Scholar
  30. Kite, Mary E., and Whitley, Bernard E., Jr. (1998). Do heterosexual men and women differ in their attitudes toward homosexuality? A conceptual and methodological analysis. In Gregory M. Herek(ed. ), Stigma and Sexual Orientation: Understanding Prejudice Against Lesbians, Gay Men, and Bisexuals, pp. 39–61. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
  31. Kunda, Ziva (2000). Social Cognition: Making Sense of People. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  32. Kunda, Ziva, Sinclair, Lisa, and Griffin, Dale (1997). Equal ratings but separate meanings: stereotypes and the construal of traits. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 72: 720–734.Google Scholar
  33. LaMar, Lisa, and Kite, Mary (1998). Sex differences in attitudes toward gay men and lesbians. Journal of Sex Research 35: 189–196.Google Scholar
  34. Leeper, Mark S. (1991). The impact of prejudice on female candidates: an experimental lookat voter inference. American Politics Quarterly 19: 248–261.Google Scholar
  35. Lepore, Lorella, and Brown, Rupert (1997). Category and stereotype activation: Is prejudice inevitable? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 72: 275–287.Google Scholar
  36. Madon, Stephanie (1997). What do people believe about gay males? A study of stereotype content and strength. Sex Roles 37: 663–685.Google Scholar
  37. Martin, Carol L. (1990). Attitudes and expectations about children with nontraditional and traditional gender roles. Sex Roles 22: 151–165.Google Scholar
  38. McCreary, Donald R. (1994). The male role and avoiding femininity. Sex Roles 31: 517–531.Google Scholar
  39. McGraw, Kathleen M. (1991). Managing blame: an experimental test of the effects of political accounts. American Political Science Review 85: 1133–1157.Google Scholar
  40. McGraw, Kathleen M., Best, Samuel, and Timpone, Richard (1995). “What they say or what they do? ”The impact of elite explanation and policy outcomes on public opinion. American Journal of Political Science 39: 53–74.Google Scholar
  41. Miller, Arthur H., Wattenburg, Martin, and Malanchuk, Oksana (1986). Schematic assessments of presidential candidates. American Political Science Review 80: 521–540.Google Scholar
  42. Nelson, Thomas E., Clawson, Rosalee A., and Oxley, Zoe M. (1997). Media framing of a civil liberties conflict and its effect on tolerance. American Political Science Review 91: 567–583.Google Scholar
  43. Reeves, Keith (1997). Voting Hopes or Fears? : White Voters, Black Candidates, and Racial Politics in America. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  44. Richter, Linda, and Kruglanski, Arie W. (1998). Seizing on the latest: Motivationally driven recency effects in impression formation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 34: 313–329.Google Scholar
  45. Sigelman, Carol K., Sigelman, Lee, Walkosz, Barbara J., and Nitz, Michael (1995). Black candidates, white voters: understanding racial bias in political perceptions. American Journal of Political Science 39: 243–265.Google Scholar
  46. Simon, Angela (1998). The relationship between stereotypes of and attitudes toward lesbians and gays. In G. M. Herek(ed. ), Stigma and Sexual Orientation: Understanding Prejudice Against Lesbians, Gay Men, and Bisexuals, pp. 62–81. Thousands Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
  47. Skowronski, John J., and Carlston, Donal E. (1989). Negativity and extremity biases in impression formation: a review of explanations. Psychological Bulletin 105: 131–142.Google Scholar
  48. Stroessner, Steven J. (1996). Social categorization by race and sex: effects of perceived non-normalcy on response times. Social Cognition 14: 247–276.Google Scholar
  49. Weinfurt, Kevin P. (1995). Multivariate analysis of variance. In Laurence G. Grim and Paul R. Yarnold (eds. ), Reading and Understanding Multivariate Statistics, pp. 245–276. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  50. Witt, Linda, Paget, Karen M., and Glenna, Matthews (1994). Running as a Woman: Gender and Power in American Politics. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  51. Worchel, Stephen, Cooper, J., and Goethals, G. R. (1988). Understanding Social Psychology. Chicago: The Dorsey Press.Google Scholar
  52. Yang, Alan S. (1997). The polls —trends: attitudes toward homosexuality. Public Opinion Quarterly 61: 477–507.Google Scholar
  53. Yeager, Ken (1999). Trailblazers: Profiles of America 's Gay and Lesbian Elected Officials. New York: Haworth Press.Google Scholar
  54. Zarate, Michael A., and Smith, Eliot R. (1990). Person categorization and stereotyping. Social Cognition 8: 161–185.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ewa A. Golebiowska
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Political ScienceWayne State UniversityDetroit

Personalised recommendations