Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The impact of crop plant cultivation and peat amendment on soil microbial activity and structure

  • Published:
Plant and Soil Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A rapid means for restoring soil fertility could be addition of peat to the plough layer. The impact of cultivation of eight different crops (the joint impact of plant and the management tailored for each plant), with and without soil amendment by peat treatment on soil microbiological, physical and chemical properties was assessed for two consecutive growing seasons. As a measure of the functional diversity of soil microbial community we estimated the activity of several different extracellular soil enzymes using the ZymProfiler® test kit. ATP content was measured to yield information on the amount of the active microbial biomass, and phospholipid fatty acid (PLFA) profiles were analysed to reveal the microbial community structure. The enzyme activity patterns of the soil samples indicated several differences due to the different crops and years but ATP content and PLFA profiles were rather stable. However, microbial biomass as total amount of PLFAs depended on the plant and peat treatment and ATP content varied between the years. The effects of the peat treatments were less clearly indicated by the biological parameters one or two years after the amendment, as only arylsulphatase and β-xylosidase activities were affected in both the years. Soil moisture, affecting enzyme activities, depended on the year and crop plant and peat addition increased it.

Abbreviations: AMC – 7-amino-4-methylcoumarin; AP – aminopeptidase; ATP – adenosine triphosphate; Cmic– microbial biomass carbon; DNA – deoxyribonucleic acid; EC – electrical conductivity; FAME – fatty acid methyl ester; fw – fresh weight; MUF – 4-methylumbelliferyl; na – not added; Nmic– microbial biomass nitrogen; PDE – phosphodiesterase; PLFA – phospholipid fatty acid; PME – phosphomonoesterase; SOM – soil organic matter

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aon M A, Cabello M N, Sarena D E, Colaneri A C, Franco M G, Burgos J L and Cortassa S 2001 I. Spatiotemporal patterns of soil microbial and enzymatic activities in an agricultural soil. Appl. Soil Ecol. 18, 239–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandick A K and Dick R P 1999 Field management effects on soil enzyme activities. Soil Biol. Biochem. 31, 1471–1479.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bending G D, Turner M K and Jones J E 2002 Interactions between crop residue and soil organic matter quality and the functional diversity of soil microbial communities. Soil Biol. Biochem. 34, 1073–1082.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bossio D A and Scow K M 1998 Impacts of carbon and flooding on soil microbial communities: Phospholipid fatty acid profiles and substrate utilization patterns. Microb. Ecol. 35, 265–278.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bossio D A, Scow K M, Gunapala N and Graham K J 1998 Determinants of soil microbial communities: Effects of agricultural management, season, and soil type on phospholipid fatty acid profiles. Microb. Ecol. 36, 1–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Buckley D H and Schmidt T M 2001 The structure of microbial communities in soil and the lasting impact of cultivation. Microb. Ecol. 42, 11–21.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Burns R G 1982 Enzyme activity in soil: Location and possible role in microbial ecology. Soil Biol. Biochem. 14, 423–427.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chang A C, Page A L and Koo B-J 2002 Biogeochemistry of phosphorus, iron, and trace elements in soils as influenced by soil-plant-microbial interactions. In Soil Mineral-organic Matter-miroorganism Interactions and Ecosystem Health. Ecological Significance of the Interactions among Clay Minerals, Organic Matter and Soil Biota. <nt>Eds.</nt> A Violante, P M Huang, J-M Bollag and L Gianfreda. Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Criquet S, Tagger S, Vogt G and Le Petit J 2002 Endoglucanase and β-glycosidase activities in an evergreen oak litter: Annual variation and regulating factors. Soil Biol. Biochem. 34, 1111–1120.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dalal R C 1998 Soil microbial biomass – What do the numbers really mean? Aust. J. Exp. Agricult. 38, 649–665.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dick R P 1994 Soil enzyme activities as indicators of soil quality. In Defining Soil Quality for a Sustainable Environment. <nt>Eds.</nt> J V Doran, D C Coleman, D F Bezdicek and B A Stewart. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. 35, 107–124.

  • Dick R P, Rasmussen P E and Kerle E A 1988 Influence of long-term residue management on soil enzyme activities in relation to soil chemical properties of a wheat-fallow system. Biol. Fertil. Soils 6, 159–164.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dick W A 1984 Influence of long-term tillage and crop rotation combinations on soil enzyme activities. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 48, 569–574.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dick W A, Cheng L and Wang P 2000 Soil acid and alkaline phosphatase activity as pH adjustment indicators. Soil Biol. Biochem. 32, 1915–1919.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dilly O and Nannipieri P 1998 Intracellular and extracellular enzyme activity in soil with reference to elemental cycling. Zeitschr. Pflanzenernähr. Bodenk. 161, 243–248.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Donnison L M, Griffith G S, Hedger J, Hobbs P J and Bardgett R D 2000 Management influences on soil microbial communities and their function in botanically diverse hay meadows of northern England and Wales. Soil Biol. Biochem. 32, 253–263.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dumontet S, Mazzatura A, Casucci C and Perucci P 2001 Effectiveness of microbial indexes in discriminating interactive effects of tillage and crop rotations in a Vertic Ustorthens. Biol. Fertil. Soils 34, 411–416.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ehrlich H L 1996 Geomicrobiology. Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frankenberger W T J and Dick W A 1983 Relationships between enzyme activities and soil microbial growth and activity indices in soil. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 47, 945–951.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman C and Nevison G B 1999 Simultaneous analysis of multiple enzymes in environmental samples using methylumbelliferyl substrates and HPLC. J. Environ. Qual. 28, 1378–1380.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman C, Liska G, Ostle N J, Jones S E and Lock M A 1995 The use of fluorogenic substrates for measuring enzyme activity in peatlands. Plant Soil 175, 147–152.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Frostegård Å, Tunhild A and Bååth E 1993 Phospholipid fatty acid composition, biomass, and activity of microbial communities from two soil types experimentally exposed to different heavy metals. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 59, 3605–3617.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Grayston S J, Wang S, Campbell C D and Edwards A C 1998 Selective influence of plant species on microbial diversity in the rhizosphere. Soil Biol. Biochem. 30, 369–378.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Grierson P F and Adams M A 2000 Plant species affect acid phosphatase, ergosterol and microbial P in a Jarrah (Eucalyptus marginata Donn ex Sm.) forest in south-western Australia. Soil Biol. Biochem. 32, 1817–1827.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jordan D, Kremer R J, Bergfield W A, Kim K Y and Cacnio V N 1995 Evaluation of microbial methods as potential indicators of soil quality in historical fields. Biol. Fertil. Soils 19, 297–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kandeler E, Tscherko D, Bruce K D, Stemmer M, Hobbs P J, Bardgett R D and Amelung W2000 Structure and function of the soil microbial community in microhabitats of a heavy metal polluted soil. Biol. Fertil. Soils 32, 390–400. bibitem Kandeler E, Marschner P, Tscherko D, Gahoonia T S and Nielsen N E 2002 Microbial community composition and functional diversity in the rhizosphere of maize. Plant Soil 238, 301–312.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman C, Liska G, Ostle N J, Jones S E and Lock M A 1995 The use of fluorogenic substrates for measuring enzyme activity in peatlands. Plant Soil 175, 147–152.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Marschner P, Yang C-H, Lieberei R and Crowley D E 2001 Soil and plant specific effects on bacterial community composition in the rhizosphere. Soil Biol. Biochem. 33, 1437–1445.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Martens D A, Johansson J B and Frankenberger W T 1992 Production and persistence of soil enzymes with repeated addition of organic residues. Soil Sci. 153, 53–61.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Muyzer G and Smalla K 1998 Application of denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) and temperature gradient gel electrophoresis (TGGE) in microbial ecology. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 73, 127–141.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nannipieri P, Muccini L and Ciardi C 1983 Microbial biomass and enzyme activities: production and persistence. Soil Biol. Biochem. 15, 679–685.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • de la Paz Jimenez M, Horra A M, Pruzzo L and Palma R M 2002 Soil quality: A new index based on microbiological and biochemical parameters. Biol. Fertil. Soils 35, 302–306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petersen S O, Frohne P S and Kennedy A C 2002 Dynamics of a Soil Microbial Community under Spring Wheat. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 66, 826–833.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sinsabaugh R L 1994 Enzymic analysis of microbial pattern and process. Biol. Fertil. Soils 17, 69–74.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stemmer M, Roth K and Kandeler E 2000 Carbon mineralization and microbial activity in a field site trial used for 14 C turnover experiments over a period of 30 years. Biol. Fertil. Soils 31, 294–302.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stenberg M, Stenberg B and Rydberg T 2000 Effects of reduced tillage and liming on microbial activity and soil properties in a weakly-structured soil. Appl. Soil Ecol. 14, 135–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tabatabai M A and Fu M 1992 Extraction of enzymes from soils. In Soil Biochemistry <nt>Eds.</nt> G Stotzky and J-M Bollag. 7, pp. 197–227 Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York.

  • Torsvik V, Goksoyr J and Daae F L 1990 High diversity in DNA of soil bacteria. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 56, 782–787.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • vanElsas J D, Duarte G F, Rosado A S and Smalla K 1998 Microbiological and molecular biological methods for monitoring microbial inoculants and their effects in the soil environment. J. Microbiol. Meth. 32, 133–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vanhala P T and Ahtiainen J H 1994 Soil respiration, ATP content, and Photobacterium toxicity test as indicators of metal pollution in soil. Environ. Toxicol. Water Qual. 9, 115–121.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vepsäläinen M2001 Poor enzyme recovery by extraction from soils. Soil Biol. Biochem. 33, 1131–1135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vepsäläinen M, Kukkonen S, Vestberg M, Sirviö H and Niemi R M 2001 Application of soil enzyme activity test kit in a field experiment. Soil Biol. Biochem. 33, 1665–1672.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wieland G, Neumann R and Backhaus H 2001 Variation of microbial communities in soil, rhizosphere, and rhizoplane in response to crop species, soil type, and crop development. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 67, 5849–5854.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zelles L 1999 Fatty acid patterns of phospholipids and lipopolysaccharides in the characterisation of microbial communities in soil: A review. Biol. Fertil. Soils 29, 111–129.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Finnish Environment Institute, P.O. Box 140, 00251, Helsinki, Finland

    Milja Vepsäläinen, Kirsti Erkomaa, Kaisa Wallenius & R. Maarit Niemi

  2. MTT Agrifood Research Finland, Plant Production Research, Horticultural Production, Laukaa Research and Elite Plant Station, Antinniementie 1, 41330, Vihtavuori, Finland

    Sanna Kukkonen & Mauritz Vestberg

Authors
  1. Milja Vepsäläinen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kirsti Erkomaa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Sanna Kukkonen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Mauritz Vestberg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Kaisa Wallenius
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. R. Maarit Niemi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vepsäläinen, M., Erkomaa, K., Kukkonen, S. et al. The impact of crop plant cultivation and peat amendment on soil microbial activity and structure. Plant Soil 264, 273–286 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:PLSO.0000047763.46795.cb

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:PLSO.0000047763.46795.cb

Search

Navigation