Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Genotypic difference in root penetration ability by durum wheat (Triticum turgidum L. var. durum) evaluated by a pot with paraffin-Vaseline discs

  • Published:
Plant and Soil Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Improvement of root penetration (RP) ability in durum wheat (Triticum turgidum L. var. durum) is an important breeding target to reduce yield losses due to soil compaction and drought. This study investigated the genotypic difference of RP ability in durum wheat of seven Ethiopian landraces (ET genotypes), which were presumed to adapt to soil compaction, and 17 genotypes bred in North America (NA genotypes). The pregerminated seed was planted in a pot with four paraffin-Vaseline (PV) discs of hardness 0.12, 0.24, 0.50 and 0.73 MPa. After eight weeks from planting, each plant was sampled and the number of roots penetrating through the PV discs was counted. No genotype penetrated through the PV disc of 0.73 MPa hardness. The number of roots penetrating through the PV disc of 0.50 MPa hardness showed a significant difference among the genotypes: highest in an ET genotype and lowest in a NA genotype. The mean value was also significantly higher in ET genotypes than in NA genotypes, and it significantly correlated with root weight density below the disc and plant height. The mean root diameter and root weight density above the disc showed no significant difference between NA and ET genotypes. Our results indicate that a large genotypic difference exists for RP ability in durum wheat, and that ET genotypes have a higher RP ability than NA genotypes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ali M L, Pathan M S, Zhang J, Bai G, Sarkarung S and Nguyen H T 2000 Mapping QTLs for root traits in a recombinant inbred population from two indica ecotypes in rice. Theor. Appl. Genet. 101, 756-766.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Babu R C, Shashidhar H E, Lilley J M, Thanh N D, Ray J D, Sadasivam S S, Sarkarung S, O'Toole J C and Nguyen H T 2001 Variation in root penetration ability, osmotic adjustment and dehydration tolerance among accessions of rice adapted to rainfed lowland and upland ecosystems. Plant Breed. 120, 233-238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bengough A G, Croser C and Pritchard J 1997 A biological analysis of root growth under mechanical stress. Plant Soil 189, 155-164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bengough A G and Kirdy J M 1999 Tribology of the root cap in maize (Zea mays) and peas (Pisum sativum). New Phytol. 142, 421-426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bengough A G and McKenzie B M 1997 Sloughing of root cap cells decreases the frictional resistance to maize (Zea maysL.) root growth. J. Exp. Bot. 48, 885-893.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bengough A G, McKenzie C J and Elangwe H E 1994 Biophysics of the growth response of pea roots to changes in penetration resistance. Plant Soil 167, 135-141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark L J, Aphale S L and Barraclough P B 2000 Screening the ability of rice roots to overcome the mechanical impedance of wax layers: importance of test conditions and measurement criteria. Plant Soil 219, 187-196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark L J, Cope R E, Whalley W R, Barraclough P B and Wade L J 2002 Root penetration of strong soil in rainfed lowland rice: comparison of laboratory screens with field performance. Field Crops Res. 76, 189-198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark L J, Whalley W R and Barraclough P B 2001 Partial mechanical impedance can increase the turgor of seedling pea roots. J. Exp. Bot. 52, 161-171.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Clark L J, Whalley W R, Dexter A R, Barraclough P B and Leigh R A 1996 Complete mechanical impedance increases the turgor of the cells in the apex of pea roots. Plant Cell Environ. 19, 1099-1102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coelho M B, Mateos L and Villalobos F J 2000 Influence of a compacted loam subsoil layer on growth and yield of irrigated cotton in Southern Spain. Soil Till. Res. 57, 129-142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Czarnes S, Hiller S, Dexter A R, Hallett P D and Bartoli F 1999 Root: shoot adhesion in the maize rhizosphere: the rheological approach. Plant Soil 211, 69-86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ennos A R 1989 The mechanics of anchorage in seedlings of sunflower, Helianthus annuusL. New Phytol. 113, 185-192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flowers M D and Lal R 1998 Axle load and tillage effects on soil physical properties and soybean grain yield on a mollic ochraqualf in northwest Ohio. Soil Till. Res. 48, 21-35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gemtos T A, Chouliaras N and Marakis St 1999 Vinasse rate, time of application and compaction effect on soil properties and durum wheat crop. J. Agric. Engng. Res. 73, 283-296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gemtos T A, Goulas C and Lellis T 2000 Sugar beet genotype response to soil compaction stress. Eur. J. Agron. 12, 201-209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanson A D, Peacock W J, Evans L T, Arntzen C J and Khush G S 1990 Drought resistance in rice. Nature 234, 26-27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harlan J R 1969 Ethiopia: A center of diversity. Econ. Bot. 23, 309-314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iijima M, Griffiths B and Bengough A G 2000 Sloughing of cap cells and carbon exudation from maize seedling roots in compacted soil. New Phytol. 145, 477-482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iijima M and Kono Y 1991 Interspecific differences of the root system structures of four cereal species as affected by soil compaction. Jpn. J. Crop Sci. 60, 130-138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ishaq M, Ibraham M, Hassan A, Saeed M and Lal R 2001 Subsoil compaction effects on crops in Panjab, Pakistan: 2. Root growth and nutrient uptake of wheat and sorghum. Soil Till. Res. 60, 153-161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iwama K, Hasegawa T Nakaseko K 1999 New potato lines with high productivity and drought tolerance. InWorld Food Security and Crop Production Technologies for Tomorrow. Ed. H Horie, S Geng, T Amano, T Inamura and T Shiraiwa. pp. 189-193. The Crop Science Society of Japan, Japan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirkegaard J A, So H B, Troedson R J and Wallis E S 1992 The effect of compaction on the growth of pigeonpea on clay soils. 1.Mechanisms of crop response and seasonal effects on a Vertisol in a sub-humid environment. Soil Till. Res. 24, 107-127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klueva N Y, Joshi R C, Joshi C P, Wester D B, Zartman R E, Cantrell R G and Nguyen H T 2000 Genetic variability and molecular responses of root penetration in cotton. Plant Sci. 155, 41-47.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Materechera S A, Alton A M, Kirby J M and Dexter A R 1992 Influence of root diameter on the penetration of seminal roots into a compacted subsoil. Plant Soil 144, 297-303.

    Google Scholar 

  • Materechera S A, Dexter A R and Alston A M 1991 Penetration of very strong soils by seedling roots of different plant species. Plant Soil 135, 31-41.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCully M E and Canny M J 1994 Contributions of the surface of the root tip to the growth of Zearoots in soil. Plant Soil 165, 315-321.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKenzie D C and McBratney A B 2001 Cotton root growth in a compacted Vertisol (Grey Vertisol). 1. Prediction using strength measurements and 'limiting water ranges'. Aust. J. Soil Res. 39, 1157-1168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Motzo R, Giovanna A and Mauro D 1993 Genotypic variation in durum wheat root systems at different stages of development in a Mediterranean environment. Euphytica 66, 197-206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen H T, Babu R C and Blum A 1997 Breeding for drought resistance in rice: physiology and molecular genetics considerations. Crop Sci. 37, 1426-1434.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oldeman L R, Hakkeling R T A and Sombroek W G 1991 World Map of the Status of Human-Induced Soil Degradation, An Explanatory Note. p 34. ISRIC, Wageningen, Netherlands/UNEP, Nairobi, Kenya.

    Google Scholar 

  • Price A H, Steele K A, Moore P J, Barraclough P B and Clark L J 2000 A combined RFLP and AFLP linkage map of upland rice (Oryza sativaL.) used to identify QTLs for root-penetration ability. Theor. Appl. Genet. 100, 49-56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ray J D, Yu L, McCouch S R, Champoux MC, Wang G and Nguyen H T 1996 Mapping quantitative trait loci associated with root penetration ability in rice (Oryza sativaL.). Theor. Appl. Genet. 92, 627-636.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sadasivam S, Babu C R, Raveendran Mand Raja J A J 2000 Genetic variation in seed germination, root traits and drought recovery in rice. Indian J. Plant Physiol. 5, 73-78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soane B D and van Ouwerkerk C 1995 Implications of soil compaction in crop production for the quality of the environment. Soil Till. Res. 35, 5-22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Srivastava J P 1987 Barley and wheat improvement for moisturelimiting areas in West Asia and North Africa. InDrought Tolerance in Winter Cereals. Ed. Srivastava J P, Porceddu E, Acevedo E and Varma S. pp. 65-79. John Wiley & Sons Ltd., New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tada A 1987 Bearing capacity. InPhysical Measurements in Flooded Rice Soils: the Japanese Methodologies. pp. 55-61. International Rice Research Institute, Manila, Philippines.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taddase G, Saleem MA M, Abyie A and Wagnew A 2002 Impact of grazing on plant species richness, plant biomass, plant attribute, and soil physical and hydrological properties of vertisol in East African highlands. Environ. Manage. 29, 279-289.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tanakamaru S, Hayashida S, Mochizuki T and Furuya T 1998 Specific difference in root penetration into the compacted soil cakes in crop plants. Jpn. J. Crop Sci. 67, 63-69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor H M and Gardner H R 1960 Use of wax substrates in root penetration studies. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 24, 79-81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whalley W R, Bengough A G and Dexter A R 1998 Water stress induced by PEG decreases the maximum growth pressure of the roots of pea seedling. J. Exp. Bot. 49, 1689-1694.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu L X, Ray J D, O'Toole J C and Nguyen H T 1995 Use of waxpetrolatum layers for screening rice root penetration. Crop Sci. 35, 684-687.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zheng H G, Babu R C, Pathan M M S, Ali L, Huang N, Courtois B and Nguyen H T 2000 Quantitative trait loci for rootpenetration ability and root thickness in rice: Comparison of genetic backgrounds. Genome 43, 53-61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Crop Science Laboratory, Department of Botany and Agronomy, Graduate School of Agriculture, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, 060-8589, Japan

    K. Kubo, Y. Jitsuyama, K. Iwama, T. Hasegawa & N. Watanabe

  2. Department of Plant Genetics and Production, Faculty of Agriculture, Gifu University, Gifu, 501-1193, Japan

    N. Watanabe

Authors
  1. K. Kubo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Y. Jitsuyama
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. K. Iwama
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. T. Hasegawa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. N. Watanabe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kubo, K., Jitsuyama, Y., Iwama, K. et al. Genotypic difference in root penetration ability by durum wheat (Triticum turgidum L. var. durum) evaluated by a pot with paraffin-Vaseline discs. Plant and Soil 262, 169–177 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:PLSO.0000037033.23964.54

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:PLSO.0000037033.23964.54

Search

Navigation