Skip to main content
Log in

Enhanced uptake of soil Pb and Zn by Indian mustard and winter wheat following combined soil application of elemental sulphur and EDTA

  • Published:
Plant and Soil Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Enhancement of Pb and Zn uptake by Indian mustard (Brassica juncea (L.) Czern.) and winter wheat (Triticum aestivumL.) grown for 50 days in pots of contaminated soil was studied with application of elemental sulphur (S) and EDTA. Sulphur was added to the soil at 5 rates (0–160 mmol kg−1) before planting, and EDTA was added in solution at 4 rates (0–8 mmol kg−1) after 40 days of plant growth. Additional pots were established with the same rates of S and EDTA but without plants to monitor soil pH and CaCl2-extractable heavy metals. The highest application rate of S acidified the soil from pH 7.1 to 6.0. Soil extractable Pb and Zn and shoot uptake of Pb and Zn increased as soil pH decreased. Both S and EDTA increased soil extractable Pb and Zn and shoot Pb and Zn uptake. EDTA was more effective than S in increasing soil extractable Pb and Zn, and the two amendments combined had a synergistic effect, raising extractable Pb to ¿1000 and Zn to ¿6 times their concentrations in unamended control soil. Wheat had higher shoot yields than Indian mustard and increasing application rates of both S and EDTA reduced the shoot dry matter yields of both plant species to as low as about half those of unamended controls. However, Indian mustard hyperaccumulated Pb in all EDTA treatments tested except the treatment with no S applied, and the maximum shoot Pb concentration was 7100 mg kg−1 under the highest application rates of S and EDTA combined. Wheat showed similar trends, but hyperaccumulation (1095 mg kg−1) occurred only at the highest rates of S and EDTA combined. Similar trends in shoot Zn were found, but with lower concentrations than Pb and far below hyperaccumulation, with maxima of 777 and 480 mg kg−1 in Indian mustard and wheat. Despite their lower yields, Indian mustard shoots extracted more Pb and Zn from the soil (up to 4.1 and 0.45 mg pot−1) than did winter wheat (up to 0.72 and 0.28 mg pot−1), indicating that the effects of S and EDTA on shoot metal concentration were more important than yield effects in determining rates of metal removal over the growth period of 50 days. Phytoextraction of Pb from this highly contaminated soil would require the growth of Indian mustard for nearly 100 years and is therefore impractical.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baker A J M, McGrath S P, Sidoli C M D and Reeves R D 1994 The possibility of in situ heavy metal decontamination of polluted soils using crops of metal-accumulating plants. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 11, 41–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Basta N T, Pantone D J and Tabatabai M A 1993 Path analysis of heavy metal adsorption by soil. Agron. J. 85, 1054–1057.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blaylock M J, Salt D E, Dushenkov S, Zakharova O, Gussman C, Kapulnik Y, Ensley B D and Raskin I 1997 Enhanced accumulation of Pb in Indian mustard by soil-applied chelating agents. Environ. Sci. Technol. 31, 860–865.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brennan M A and Shelley M L 1999 A model of the uptake, translocation, and accumulation of lead (Pb) by maize for the purpose of phytoextraction. Ecol. Eng. 12, 271–297.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunzl K, Trautmannsheimer M, Schramel P and Reifenhauser W 2001 Availability of arsenic, copper, lead, thallium and zinc to various vegetables grown in slag-contaminated soils. J. Environ. Qual. 30, 934–939.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen H and Cutright T 2001 EDTA and HEDTA effects on Cd, Cr, and Ni uptake by Helianthus annuus.Chemosphere 45, 21–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chlopecka A, Bacon J R, Wilson M J and Kay J 1996 Forms of cadmium, lead, and zinc in contaminated soils from southwest Poland. J. Environ. Qual. 25, 69–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang J W and Cunningham S 1996 Lead phytoextraction: Species variation in lead uptake and translocation. New Phytol. 134, 75–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang J W W, Chen J J, Berti W R and Cunningham S D 1997 Phytoremediation of lead-contaminated soils: Role of synthetic chelates in lead phytoextraction. Environ. Sci. Technol. 31, 800–805.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jung M C and Thornton I 1997 Environmental contamination and seasonal variation of metals in soils, plants and waters in the paddy fields around a Pb-Zn mine in Korea. Sci. Total Environ. 198, 105–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kayser A, Wenger K, Keller A, Attinger W, Felix H R, Gupta S K and Schulin R 2000 Enhancement of phytoextraction of Zn, Cd, and Cu from calcareous soil: The use of NTA and sulfur amendments. Environ. Sci. Technol. 34, 1778–1783.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar P B A N, Dushenkov V, Motto H and Raskin I 1995 Phytoextraction: The use of plants to remove heavy metals from soils Environ. Sci. Technol. 29, 1232–1238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee A, Boswell C C and Watkinson J H 1988 Effect of particle size on the oxidation of elemental sulphur, thiobacilli numbers, soil sulfate and its availability to pasture. N. Z. J. Agric. Res. 31, 179–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lock K and Janssen C R 2001 Ecotoxicity of zinc in spiked artifical soils versus contaminated field soils.Environ. Sci. Technol. 35, 4295–4300.

    Google Scholar 

  • McBride M B 1994 Environmental Chemistry of Soils. Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markus J and McBratney A B 2001 A review of the contamination of soil with lead. II. Spatial distribution and risk assessment of soil lead. Environ. Int. 27, 399–411.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martínez C E and Motto H L 2000 Solubility of lead, zinc and copper added to mineral soils Environ. Pollut. 107, 153–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Novozamsky I, Lexmond Th M and Houba V J G 1993 A single extraction procedure of soil for evaluation of uptake of some heavy metals by plant Int. J. Environ. Anal. Chem. 51, 47–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Puschenreiter M, Stöger G, Lombi E, Horak O and Wenzel W 2001 Phytoextraction of heavy metal contaminated soils with Thlaspi goesingense and Amaranthus hybridus: Rhizosphere manipulation using EDTA and ammonium sulfate. J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci. 164, 615–621.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rauret G 1998 Extraction procedures for the determination of heavy metals in contaminated soil and sediment Talanta. 46, 449–455.

    Google Scholar 

  • Römkens P, Bouwman L, Japenga J and Draaisma C 2002 Potentials and drawbacks of chelate-enhanced phytoremediation of soils. Environ. Pollut. 116, 109–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salt D E, Blaylock M J, Kumar N P B A, Dushenkov V, Ensley B D, Chet I and Raskin I 1995 A novel strategy for removal of toxic metals from the environment using plants. Biotechnology 13, 468–474.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tichý R, Fajtl J, Kuzel S and Kolar L 1997 Use of elemental sulphur to enhance cadmium solubilization and its vegetative removal from contaminated soil. Nutr. Cycl. Agroecosyst. 46, 249–255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wasay S A, Barrington S F and Tokunaga S 1998 Remediation of soils polluted by heavy metals using salts of organic acids and chelating agents. Environ. Technol. 19, 369–379.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu J Z and Klarup D 1994 Extraction kinetics of copper, zinc, iron, and manganese from contaminated sediment using disodium ethylenediaminetetraacetate. Water Air Soil Pollut. 75, 205–225.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cui, Y., Wang, Q., Dong, Y. et al. Enhanced uptake of soil Pb and Zn by Indian mustard and winter wheat following combined soil application of elemental sulphur and EDTA. Plant and Soil 261, 181–188 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:PLSO.0000035551.22918.01

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:PLSO.0000035551.22918.01

Navigation