Plant and Soil

, Volume 259, Issue 1–2, pp 29–37 | Cite as

Micro-scale spatial heterogeneity and the loss of carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus in degraded grassland in Ordos Plateau, northwestern China

  • Xiaoli Cheng
  • Shuqing An
  • Shirong Liu
  • Guoqi Li


The micro-scale spatial distribution and loss of carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus were examined in degraded grassland near Ordos, in the Mu Us Sand-land, northwestern China. Five communities that represented a series of successionally degraded stages in desertification were chosen for the work. The dominant plant of Community 1 was the steppe grass Stipa bungeana; Community 2 was dominated by a mix of S. bungeana and the shrub Artemisia ordosia; Community 3 was A. ordosia; Community 4 was a mix of A. ordosia and the desert grass Cynanchum komorovii; and Community 5 was C. komorovii. The soils in root-spheres and in the bare openings between plants in five successionally degraded plant communities were analyzed for total organic carbon (TOC), total nitrogen (TN), inorganic nitrogen (IN), total phosphorus (TP), and available phosphorus (AP). The results showed that the heterogeneity process of the soil chemistry was characterized first by TOC heterogeneity and later by TN heterogeneity. The heterogeneity process of TP was only characterized in the community 3. No significant heterogeneity was present for AP in the five community stages. At the beginning of degradation, invasion by the shrub A. ordosia of S. bungeana grassland was found to lead to competition for soil elements between S. bungeana and A. ordosia and made the Community 2 soil environment temporarily homogeneous. In Community 3, however, the soil elements became spatially heterogeneous, and this led to the development of `islands of fertility'. The concentrations of soil elements (TOC, TN and IN) were greatest in the shrub root-spheres. With further desertification (from Community 4 to Community 5), the islands of fertility began to collapse, and the concentrations of the main soil elements declined rapidly. The dynamics of soil phosphorus under progressive desertification were different from those of the other soil elements. TP decreased from form Community 1 to Community 5, while the AP concentration did not change in mid-level desertification (Community 3), but increased with serious desertification (Community 5).

desertification heterogeneity process soil element loss soil nutrients spatial heterogeneity 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Breshears D D and Barnes F J 1999 Interrelationships between plant functional types and soil moisture heterogeneity for semiarid Landscapes within grassland/forest continuum: A unified conceptual model. Landsc. Ecol. 14, 465–478.Google Scholar
  2. Burke I C 1989 Control of nitrogen mineralization in a sagebrush steppe landscape. Ecology 70, 1115–1126.Google Scholar
  3. Burke I C, Reiners W A and Schimel D S 1989 Organic matter turnover in a sagebrush steppe landscape. Biogeochemistry 7, 11–31.Google Scholar
  4. Burke I C, Lauenroth W H, Vinton M A, Hook P B, Kelly R H, Epstein H E, Aguiar M R, Robles M D, Aguilera M O, Murphy K L and Gill R A 1998 Plant-soil interactions in temperate grasslands. Biogeochemistry 42, 121–143.Google Scholar
  5. Charley J L and West N E 1975 Plant-induced soil chemical patterns in some shrub-dominated semi-desert ecosystems of Utah. J. Ecol. 63, 945–963.Google Scholar
  6. Charley J L and West N E 1977. Micro-patterns of nitrogen mineralization activity in soils of some shrub-dominated semi-desert ecosystems of Utah. Soil Biol. Biochem. 9, 357–365.Google Scholar
  7. Cheng X L, An S Q, Li G Q, Cheng X L, Wang Y J and Li J. 2001a The correlation between the desertification of grassland and the change of vegetation characteristics in Ordos. J. Nanjing Univ. 37, 230–239 (in Chinese with English abstract).Google Scholar
  8. Cheng X L, An S Q, Cheng X L, Li G Q and Liu S R 2001b The correlation between the desertification of grassland and the change of vegetation biomass in Ordos. Sci. Sil. Sini. 37, 13–20 (in Chinese with English abstract).Google Scholar
  9. Cross A F, Schlesinger W H 1999 Plant regulation of soil nutrient distribution in the northern Chihuahuan Desert. Plant Ecol. 145(1): 11–25.Google Scholar
  10. Fisher F M, Zak J C, Cunningham, G L and Whitford W G 1987 Water and nitrogen effects on growth and allocation patterns of creosotebush in the northern Chihuahua Desert. J. Range Manag. 47, 387–391.Google Scholar
  11. Garner W and Steinberger Y 1989 A proposed mechanism for the formation of ‘Fertile Island’ in the desert ecosystem. J. Arid Environ. 16, 257–262.Google Scholar
  12. Greig-Smith P 1983 Quantitative Plant Ecology. 3rd ed. Blackwell Scientific Publications, London.Google Scholar
  13. Hook P B, Burke I C and Lauenroth W K 1991 Heterogeneity of soil and plant N and C associated with individual plants and opening in North American shortgrass steppe. Plant Soil 138, 247–256.Google Scholar
  14. Huenneke L F, Anderson J P, Remmenga M and Schlesinger W H 2002 Desertification alters patterns of aboveground net primary production in Chihuanhuan ecosystems. Global Change Biol. 8(3): 247–264.Google Scholar
  15. Jackson R B, Manwaring J H and Caldwell M M 1990 Rapid physiological adjustment of roots to localized soil enrichment. Nature 344, 58–60.Google Scholar
  16. Jackson R B and Caldwell M M 1993a The scale of nutrient heterogeneity around individual plants and the quantification with geostatistics. Ecology 74, 612–614.Google Scholar
  17. Jackson R B and Caldwell M M 1993b The geosatistical patterns of soil heterogeneity around individual perennial plants. J Ecol. 81, 683–692.Google Scholar
  18. Katherinel G, Kurts P and Andrew J B 1995 Spatial variation in nitrogen availability in three successional plant communities. J. Ecol. 83, 357–367.Google Scholar
  19. Kieft K L, White C S, Loftin S R, Aguilar R, Craig J A and Skaar D A 1998 Temporal dynamics in soil carbon and nitrogen resources at a grassland-shrubland ecotone. Ecology 79, 671–683.Google Scholar
  20. Li X R 1997 The characteristics of the flora of the shrub resource in Maomusu sandland and the countermeasures for the protection. J. Nat. Res. 12, 146–152 (in Chinese with English abstract).Google Scholar
  21. Li X R 2001 Study on shrub community diversity of Ordos Plateau, Inner Mongolia, Northern China. J. Arid Environ. 47, 271–279.Google Scholar
  22. Lin N F and Tang J. 2002. Geological environment and causes for desertification in arid-semiarid regions in China. Environmental Geology. 41(7), 806–815.Google Scholar
  23. Mouat D, Lancaster J, Wade T, Wickham J, Fox C, Kepner W and Ball T 1997 Desertification evaluated using integrated environmental assessment model. Environ. Monit. Ass. 48, 139–156.Google Scholar
  24. Nelson D W and Sommers L E 1980 Total nitrogen analysis for soil and plant tissues. J. Assoc. Anal. Chem. 63, 770–778.Google Scholar
  25. Robertson G P, Huston M A, Evans F C and Tiedje J M 1988 Spatial variability in a successional plant community: patterns of nitrogen availability. Ecology 69, 1517–1524.Google Scholar
  26. Robertson G P, Crum J R and Ellis B G 1993 The spatial variability of soil resources following long-term disturbance. Oecologia 96, 451–456.Google Scholar
  27. Robertson G P and Gross K L 1994 Assessing the heterogeneity of belowground resources: quantifying scale. In Exploitation of Environmental Heterogeneity by Plants. Eds. Caldwell MM Pearcy RW, pp. 237–253. Academic Press, New York, USA.Google Scholar
  28. Schlesinger W H, Reynolds J F, Cunningham G L, Huenneke L F, Jarrell W M, Virginia R A and Whitford W G 1990 Biological feedbacks in global desertification. Science 47, 1043–1048.Google Scholar
  29. Schlesinger W H, Raikes J A, Hartley A E and Cross A F 1996 On the spatial pattern of soil nutrients in desert ecosystem. Ecology 77, 364–374.Google Scholar
  30. Schlesinger W H, Aberhams A D, Parsons A J and Wainwright J 1999 Nutrient losses in runoff from grassland and shrubland habitats in Southern New Mexico: I. Rainfall simulation experiments. Biogeochemistry 45, 21–34.Google Scholar
  31. Schlesinger W H, Ward T J and Anderson J 2000 Nutrient losses in runoff from grassland and shrubland habitats in southern New Mexico: II Field plots. Biogeochemistry 49, 69–86.Google Scholar
  32. Seixas J 2000. Assessing heterogeneity from remote sensing images: the case of desertification in southern Portugal. Int. J. Rem. Sens. 21, 2645–2663.Google Scholar
  33. Shachak M, Sachs M and Moshe I 1998 Ecosystem management of desertified shrublands in Israel. Ecosystem 1, 475–483.Google Scholar
  34. Snyder J D and Trofymow J A 1984 A rapid accurate wet oxidation diffusion procedure for determining organic and inorganic carbon in plant and soil samples. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 15, 587–597.Google Scholar
  35. Sun S C and Liu G Z 1997 Study on the patterns of Convolvulus Tragacuthoiedes population in the upper reaches of the Minjiang River. Chin. J. App. Environ. Biol. 3, 193–198 (in Chinese with English abstract).Google Scholar
  36. Tongway D J and Ludwig J A 1994 Small-scale resources heterogeneity in semi-arid landscapes. Pacific Conserv. Biol. 1, 201–208.Google Scholar
  37. Zhang X S 1994 The optimization pattern and principle of grassland construction and ecological background of Maomusu sandland. Acta Phytoecol. Sini. 18, 1–16 (in Chinese with English abstract).Google Scholar
  38. Zheng H L and Z C Huang 1992 Physiological ecology study on Artemisia Ordosica and Cynanchum Komarovii in the maowusu sandland. Acta Phytoecol. et Geobo. Sini. 16: 197–207 (in Chinese with English abstract).Google Scholar
  39. Yang B Z, Dong X J, Gong Q, Liu Z M and Al D B 1994 A study on the transpiration and water-defict regime of the Artemisia Ordosica community. Acta Phytoecol. Sini. 18, 161–170 (in Chinese with English abstract).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Xiaoli Cheng
    • 1
  • Shuqing An
    • 1
  • Shirong Liu
    • 2
  • Guoqi Li
    • 3
  1. 1.School of Life ScienceNanjing UniversityNanjingP.R. China
  2. 2.The Institute of Forest Ecology, Environment and ProtectionChinese Academy ForestryBeijingP.R. China
  3. 3.Department of BiologyNingxia UniversityYinchuanP.R. China

Personalised recommendations