Philosophical Studies

, Volume 120, Issue 1–3, pp 37–89 | Cite as

The Limits of Self-Awareness

  • M.G.F. Martin
Article

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Alston, W. (1999): ‘Back to the Theory of Appearing’, Philosophical Perspectives (Epistemology) 13, 181–203.Google Scholar
  2. Anscombe, G.E.M. (1962): ‘The Intentionality of Sensation: A Grammatical Feature’, in R. Butler (ed.), Analytic Philosophy, second series, Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  3. Anscombe, G.E.M. (1981): ‘Causality and Determination’, in Metaphysics and the Philosophy of Mind: Collected Papers, Vol. II, Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  4. Broad, C.D. (1925): The Mind and Its Place in Nature, London: Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  5. Chisholm, R. (1959): Perception, Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Dancy, J. (1995): ‘Arguments from Illusion’, The Philosophical Quarterly 45, 421–438.Google Scholar
  7. Evans, G. (1982): The Varieties of Reference, J. McDowell (ed.), Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  8. Firth, R. (1965): ‘Sense-Data and the Percept Theory’, in R. Swartz (ed.), Perceiving, Sensing and Knowing, Los Angeles/Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  9. Foster, J. (1986): A.J. Ayer, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  10. Foster, J. (2000): The Nature of Perception, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Gendler, T.S. (2002): ‘Personal Identity and Thought Experiments’, The Philosophical Quarterly 52(206), 34–54.Google Scholar
  12. Graff, D. (2001): ‘Phenomenal Continuua and the Sorites’, Mind 110(440), 905–935.Google Scholar
  13. Harman, G. (1990): ‘The Intrinsic Quality of Experience’, in J. Tomberlin (ed.), Philosophical Perspectives vol. 4, Ridgeview Publishing Co.Google Scholar
  14. Hinton, J.M. (1967): ‘Visual Experiences’, Mind 76, 217–227.Google Scholar
  15. Hinton, J.M. (1973): Experiences: An Inquiry into Some Ambiguities, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  16. Jackson, F. (1977): Perception: A Representative Theory, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Langsam, H. (1997): ‘The Theory of Appearing Defended’, Philosophical Studies 87, 33–59.Google Scholar
  18. Martin, M.G.F. (2001): ‘Beyond Dispute’, in T. Crane and S. Patterson (eds.), The History of the Mind-Body Problem, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  19. Martin, M.G.F. (2002): ‘The Transparency of Experience’, Mind and Language 17(4), 376–425.Google Scholar
  20. McDowell, J. (1982): ‘Criteria, Defeasibility and Knowledge’, Proceedings of the British Academy.Google Scholar
  21. McDowell, J. (1986): ‘Singular Thought and the Extent of Inner Space’, in P. Pettit and J. McDowell (eds.), Subject, Thought and Context, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  22. Merleau-Ponty, M. (1942): La Structure de comportement, A. Fisher (trans.), Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
  23. Moore, G.E. (1905): ‘The Nature of Perception???’, in T. Baldwin (ed.), Selected Papers, London: Routledge (original edition, 1905).Google Scholar
  24. Moore, G.E. (1922): ‘The Refutation of Idealism’, in Philosophical Studies, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  25. O'Shaughnessy, B. (1980): The Will, 2 vols., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Peacocke, C.A.B. (1983): Sense and Content, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  27. Peacocke, C.A.B. (1992): A Study of Concepts, Cambridge MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  28. Peacocke, C.A.B. (1993): ‘Externalist Explanation’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society XCIII, 203–230.Google Scholar
  29. Price, H.H. (1932): Perception, London: Methuen.Google Scholar
  30. Prichard, H.A. (1950): Knowledge and Perception, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  31. Robinson, H. (1985): ‘The General Form of the Argument for Berkeleian Idealism’, in J. Foster and H. Robinson (eds.), Essays on Berkeley: A Tercentennial Celebration, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  32. Robinson, H. (1994): Perception, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  33. Russell, B. (1912): The Problems of Philosophy 9th edn., Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Searle, J. (1983): Intentionality, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Snowdon, P.F. (1980–1981): ‘Perception, Vision and Causation’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society.Google Scholar
  36. Sturgeon, S. (1998): ‘Visual Experience’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 98, 179–200.Google Scholar
  37. Sturgeon, S. (2000): Matters of Mind: Consciousness, Reason and Nature, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  38. Tye, M. (1995): Ten Problems about Consciousness, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  39. Valberg, J.J. (1992): The Puzzle of Experience, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  40. Williamson, T. (1990): Identity and Discrimination, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  41. Williamson, T. (1995): ‘Is Knowing a State of Mind?’, Mind 104(415), 533–565.Google Scholar
  42. Williamson, T. (2000): Knowledge and Its Limits, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Yablo, S. (1992): ‘Mental Causation’, Philosophical Review 101(2), 245–280.Google Scholar
  44. Yablo, S. (1997): ‘Wide Causation’, in E. James (ed.), Philosophical Perspectives, 11, Mind, Causation, and World, Boston: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • M.G.F. Martin
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyUniversity College LondonLondonUK

Personalised recommendations