Skip to main content

Introspection and subliminal perception

Abstract

Subliminal perception (SP) is today considered a well-supported theory stating that perception can occur without conscious awareness and have a significant impact on later behaviour and thought. In this article, we first present and discuss different approaches to the study of SP. In doing this, we claim that most approaches are based on a dichotomic measure of awareness. Drawing upon recent advances and discussions in the study of introspection and phenomenological psychology, we argue for both the possibility and necessity of using an elaborated measure of subjective states. In the second part of the article, we present findings where these considerations are implemented in an empirical study. The results and implications are discussed in detail, both with reference to SP, and in relation to the more general problem of using elaborate introspective reports as data in relation to studies of cognition.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

References

  1. Avant, L. L. and Thieman, A. A. 1985. On visual access to letter case and lexical/semantic information. Memory and Cognition 13: 393-404.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Balota, D. A. 1983. Automatic semantic activation and episodic memory. Journal of verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 22: 88-104.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bauer, R. M. 1984. Autonomic recognition of names and faces in prosopagnosia: A neuropsychological application of the Guilty Knowledge Test. Neuropsychologia 224: 457-469.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Baars, B. J. 1994. A thoroughly empirical approach to consciousness. PSYCHE 16.

  5. Cheesman, J. and Merikle, P. M. 1984. Priming with and without awareness. Perception and Psychophysics 36: 387-395.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cheesman, J. and Merikle, P. M. 1986. Distinguishing conscious from unconscious perceptual processes. Canadian Journal of Psychology 40: 343-367.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Dixon, L. F. 1971. Subliminal Perception: The Nature of a Controversy. New York: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Farah, M. J. 1989. Mechanisms of imagery-perception interaction. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 15: 203-211.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Farah, M. J. 1994. Specialisation within visual object recognition: Clues from prosopagnosia and alexia. In: M. J. Farah and F. Ratcliff (eds), The Neuropsychology of High-Level Vision: Collected Tutorial Essays, pp. 133-146. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Fendrich, R., Wessinger, C. M. and Gazzaniga, M. S. 2000. Speculations on the neural basis of islands of blindsight. Progress in Brain Research 134: 353-366.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Fowler, C. A., Wolford, G., Slade, R. and Tassinary, L. 1981. Lexical access with and without awareness. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 110: 341-362.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Georgeson, M. 1997. Vision and action: You ain't seen nothin' yet.... Perception 26 (http://www.perceptionweb.com/perc0197/editorial.html).

  13. Groeger, J. 1988. Qualitatively different effects of undetected and unidentified auditory primes. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 40A: 323-339.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hines, D., Czerwinski, M., Sawyer, P. K. and Dwyer, M. 1986. Automatic semantic priming: Effect of category exemplar level and word association level. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 12: 370-379.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Jack, A. I. and Shallice, T. 2001. Introspective physicalism as an approach to the science of consciousness. Cognition 79: 161-196.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kemp-Wheeler, S. M. and Hill, A. B. 1988. Semantic priming without awareness: Some methodological considerations and replications. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 40A: 671-692.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kihlstrom, J. F. 1987. The cognitive unconscious. Science 237: 1145-1151.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kolb, F. C. and Braun, J. 1995. Blindsight in normal observers. Nature 377 (6547): 336-338.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kotze, H. F. and Moller, A. T. 1990. Effect of auditory subliminal stimulation on GSR. Psychological Reports 67: 931-934.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Kunst-Wilson, W. R. and Zajonc, R. B. 1980. Affective discrimination of stimuli that cannot be recognized. Science 207: 557-558.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Lutz, A. 2002. Toward a neurophenomenology as an account of generative passages: A first empirical case study. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 1 (2): 133-167.

    Google Scholar 

  22. McCauley, C., Parmelee, C. M. and Sperber, R. D. 1980. Early extraction of meaning from pictures and its relation to conscious identification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 62: 265-276.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Mangan, B. 2001. Sensation's Ghost. The Non-Sensory “Fringe” of Consciousness. PSYCHE 718 (October).

  24. Marcel, A. J. 1983. Conscious and unconscious perception: Experiments on visual masking and word recognition, Cognitive Psychology 15: 197-237.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Marcel, A. J. 1998. Blindsight and shape perception: deficit of visual consciousness or of visual function? Brain 121 (Part 8): 1565-1588.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Merikle, P. M. and Daneman, M. 1998a. Memory for unconsciously perceived events: Evidence from anesthetized patients. Consciousness and Cognition 5: 525-541.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Merikle, P. M. and Daneman, M. 1998b. Psychological investigations of unconscious perception. Journal of Consciousness Studies 5: 5-18.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Merikle, P. M. and Daneman, M. 2000. Conscious vs. unconscious perception. In: M. S. Gazzaniga (ed), The New Cognitive Neurosciences, 2nd edn., pp. 1295-1303. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Merikle, P. M. and Joordens, S. 1997a. Measuring unconscious influences. In: J. D. Cohen and J. W. Schooler (eds), Scientific Approaches to Consciousness, pp. 109-123. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Merikle, P. M. and Joordens, S. 1997b. Parallels between perception without attention and perception without awareness. Consciousness and Cognition 6: 219-236.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Merikle, P. M., Smilek, D. and Eastwood, J. D. 2001. Perception without awareness: Perspectives from cognitive psychology. Cognition 79: 115-134.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Norman, E. 2002. Subcategories of “fringe consciousness” and their related noncon-scious contexts. PSYCHE 815 (October) (http://psyche.cs.monash.edu.au/v8/psyche-8-15-norman.html).

  33. Overgaard, M., Kauffmann, O. and Ramsøy, T. Z. 2001. Consciousness and introspection. Journal of Consciousness Studies: Consciousness Research Abstract, 182.

  34. Overgaard, M. and Sørensen, T. A. (submitted). Introspection as a process distinct from first order experiences. Journal of Consciousness Studies.

  35. Peirce, C. S. and Jastrow, J. 1884. On small differences of sensation. Memoirs of National Academy of Sciences 3:73-83.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Ptito, A., Fortin, A. and Ptito, M. 2001. 'seeing' in the blind hemifield following hemispherectomy. Progress in Brain Research 134: 367-378.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Purcell, D. G., Stewart, A. L. and Stanovich, K. E. 1983. Another look at semantic priming without awareness. Perception and Psychophysics 34: 65-71.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Rosenthal, D. 2000a. Introspection and self-interpretation. Philosophical Topics 28 (2): 201-233.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Rosenthal, D. 2000b. Metacognition and higher-order thoughts. Consciousness and Cognition 9 (2): 231-242.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Schooler, J. W. 2002. Rerepresenting consciousness: Dissociations between experience and meta-consciousness. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 6 (8): 339-344.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Sidis, B. 1898. The Psychology of Suggestion. New York: Appleton and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Stambrook, M. and Martin, D. G. 1983. Brain laterality and the subliminal perception of facial expression. International Journal of Neuroscience 18 (1/2): 45-58.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Stroh, M. A., Shaw, M. and Washburn, M. F. 1908. A study of guessing. American Journal of Psychology 19: 243-245.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Tranel, D. and Damasio, A. R. 1985. Knowledge without awareness: an autonomic index of facial recognition by prosopagnosics. Science 228 (4706): 1453-1454.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Weiskrantz, L. 1986. Blindsight: A Case Study and Implications. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Zeki, S. and Ffytche, D. H. 1998. The Riddoch syndrome: Insights into the neurobiology of conscious vision. Brain 121: 25-45.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ramsøy, T.Z., Overgaard, M. Introspection and subliminal perception. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 3, 1–23 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:PHEN.0000041900.30172.e8

Download citation

  • blindsight
  • introspection
  • nonconscious perception
  • Riddoch syndrome
  • residual phenomenality