Interactional expertise as a third kind of knowledge

Abstract

Between formal propositional knowledge and embodied skill lies ‘interactional expertise’—the ability to converse expertly about a practical skill or expertise, but without being able to practice it, learned through linguistic socialisation among the practitioners. Interactional expertise is exhibited by sociologists of scientific knowledge, by scientists themselves and by a large range of other actors. Attention is drawn to the distinction between the social and the individual embodiment theses: a language does depend on the form of the bodies of its members but an individual within that community can learn the language without the body. The idea has significance for our understanding of colour-blindness, deafness and other abilities and disabilities.

They say that love's a word,

a word we've only heard the meaning of.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. Collins, H. M. 1985. Changing Order: Replication and Induction in Scientific Practice. Beverley Hills and London: Sage [second edition University of Chicago Press, 1992].

    Google Scholar 

  2. Collins, H. M. 1990. Artificial Experts: Social Knowledge and Intelligent Machines. Cambridge, MA: MIT press.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Collins, H. M. 1996a. Embedded or embodied: Hubert Dreyfus's what computers still can't do. Artificial Intelligence 80(1): 99–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Collins, H. M. 1996b. Interaction without society?: What Avatars can't do. In: M. Stefik (ed), Internet Dreams, pp. 317–326. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Collins, H. M. and Kusch, M. 1998. The Shape of Actions: What Humans and Machines Can Do. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Collins, H. M. 2000. Four kinds of knowledge, two (or maybe three) kinds of embodiment, and the question of artifical intelligence. In: J. Malpas and M. Wrathall (eds), Heidegger, Coping, and Cognitive Science: Essays in Honor of Hubert L. Dreyfus, vol. 2, pp. 179–195. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Collins, H. and Evans, R. with Murdoch, J. Speers, T. Cole, S. and Gorman, M. in preparation. Expertise.

  8. Dennett, D. 1982. Where am I. In: D. Hofstadter and D. Dennett (eds), The Mind's I: Fantasies and Reflections on Self and Soul pp. 217–229. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Dreyfus, H. L. 1972. What Computers Can't Do. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Dreyfus, H L. 1992. What Computers Still Can't Do. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Jackson, F. 1986. What Mary didn't now. Journal of Philosophy. 83: 291–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Collins, H. M. and Kusch, M. 1998. The Shape of Actions: What Humans and Machines Can Do. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

  13. Kennefick, D. 2000. The star crushers: Theoretical practice and the theoretician's regress. Social Studies of Science. 30(1): 5–40.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ladd, P. 2003. Understanding Deaf Culture: In Search of Deafhood. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Pamplin, B. R. and Collins, H. M. 1975. Spoon bending: An experimental approach. Nature 257(September): 8.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Sacks, O. 1985. The Man Who Mistook his Wife for a Hat. London: Duckworth.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Sacks, O. 1989. Seeing Voices: A Journey into the World of the Deaf. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Sacks, O. 1996. The Island of the Colour-Blind and Cycad Island. London: Picador

    Google Scholar 

  19. Selinger, E. 2003. The necessity of embodiment: The Dreyfus-Collins debate. Philosophy Today 47(3): 266–279.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Stephenson, N. 1992. Snow Crash. New York: Bantam.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Collins, H. Interactional expertise as a third kind of knowledge. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 3, 125–143 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:PHEN.0000040824.89221.1a

Download citation

  • Hubert Dreyfus
  • individual embodiment
  • interactional expertise
  • minimal body
  • Oliver Sacks
  • participatory expertise
  • social embodiment