Skip to main content
Log in

Economic and Geographical Distance: Explaining Mercosur Sectoral Exports to the EU

  • Published:
Open Economies Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The objective of this paper is to apply a modified gravity model to annual exports disaggregated by sector, from MERCOSUR + Chile to the 15 current members of the EU. In doing so, we aimed to classify sectors according to their sensitivity to geographical and economic distance and to identify which commodities enjoy export strength even without further progress in trade liberalisation with the EU. In the estimation we made use of two additional explanatory variables which are found to be relevant when explaining trade, namely, infrastructure and exchange rates. An exchange rate index is built that takes into account protection. Our results support the view that different sectors have a different sensitivity to distance and highlight the importance of using disaggregated data when analysing international trade flows.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, James E. (1979) “A Theoretical Foundation for the Gravity Equation.” American Economic Review 69:106–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, James E. and Eric van Wincoop (2001) “Gravity with Gravitas: A Solution to the Border Puzzle.” National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper 8079. Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnon, A., Spivak, A. and Weinblatt, J. (1996) “The Potential for Trade Between Israel, the Palestinians and Jordan.” World Economy 19:113–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balaguer-Franch, Ma José and Inmaculada Martinez-Zarzoso (2000) “An álisis de los Flujos Comerciales UE-MERCOSUR.” Informaci òn Comercial Espa ñ ola. Revista de Economia 788:119–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhargava, Alok, Luisa Franzini and Wiji Narendranathan (1983) “Serial Correlation and the Fixed Effects Model.” Review of Economic Studies, 49:533–549.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergstrand, Jeffrey H. (1985) “The Gravity Equation in International Trade: Some Microeconomic Foundations and Empirical Evidence.” The Review of Economics and Statistics 67:474–481.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergstrand, Jeffrey H. (1989) “The Generalised Gravity Equation, Monopolistic Competition, and the Factor-Proportions Theory in International Trade.” The Review of Economics and Statistics 67:474–481.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bougheas, Spiros, Panicos Demetriades, and Edgar Morgenroth (1999) “Infrastructure, Transport Costs and Trade.” Journal of International Economics 47:169–189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breuss, Fritz and Peter Egger (1999) “How Reliable are Estimations of East-West Trade Potentials Based on Cross-Section Gravity Analyses?” Empirica 26(2):81–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carrillo, Carlos and Carmen A Li (2002) “Trade Blocs and the Gravity Model: Evidence from Latin American Countries.” Mimeo. Department of Economics, University of Essex, England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, I-Hui and Howard J. Wall (1999) “Controlling for Heterogeneity in Gravity Models of Trade.” Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Working Paper 99-010A.

  • Deardorff, Alan V. (1995) “Determinants of Bilateral Trade: Does GravityWork in a NeoclassicWorld? National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper 5377. Cambridge, MA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diao, Xinshen and Agapi Somwaru (2000) “An Inquiry on General Equilibrium Effects of MERCOSUR: An Intertemporal World Model.” Journal of Policy Modelling 22(4):557–588.

    Google Scholar 

  • Egger, Peter (2000) “A Note on the Proper Econometric Specification of the Gravity Equation.” Economics Letters 66:25–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Endoh, Masahiro (2000) “The Transition of Post-War Asia-Pacific Trade Relations.” Journal of Asian Economics 10(4):571–589.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helpman, Elhanan and Paul Krugman (1985) Market Structure and Foreign Trade. Increasing Returns, Imperfect Competition, and the International Economy. Cambridge, MA/London: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch, Seev, Igal Ayal, and Gideon Fishelson (1995) “The Arab-Israely Trade Potential: Methodological Considerations and Examples.” In M. Kreinin (ed.) Contemporary Issues in Comercial Policy. New York: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch, Seev and Niron Hashai (2000) “The Arab-Israeli Trade Potential: The Role of Distance-Sensitive Products.” The International Trade Journal 14(1):1–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Limao, Nuño and Anthony J. Venables (2001) “Infrastructure, Geographical Disadvantage and Transport Costs.” World Bank Economic Review 15(3):451–479.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linder, Staffan B. (1961) An Essay on Trade and Transformation, New York: Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loser, Claudio and Martine Guerguil (1999) “Trade and Trade Reform in Latin America and the Caribbean in the 1990s.” Journal of Applied Economics II(1):61–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martín, Carmela (2000) The Spanish Economy in the New Europe. London: Macmillan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martínez-Zarzoso, Inmaculada and Felicitas Nowak-Lehmann (2001) “Augmented Gravity Model: An Empirical Application to MERCOSUR-European Union Trade Flows.” Journal of Applied Economics VI(2):269–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martinez-Zarzoso, Inmaculada and Susana Valencia-Parrilla (2001) “Estructura y evoluci òn del comercio exterior de MERCOSUR.” Informaci òn Comercial Espa ñ ola. Revista De Economía 790:119–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mcpherson, Michael A., Michael R. Redfearn, and Margie A. Tieslau (2000) “A Re-Examination Of The Linder Hypothesis: A Random-Effects Tobit Approach.” International Economic Journal 14(3):123–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Màtyàs, LàszlÓ (1997) “Proper Econometric Specification of the Gravity Model.” TheWorld Economy 20(3):363–368.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pöyöhnen, Pentti (1963) “A Tentative Model for the Volume of Trade between Countries.” Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv 90:93–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soloaga, Isidro and Alan Winters (1999) “Regionalism in the Nineties: What Effects on Trade?" Development Economic Group of the World Bank, mimeo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Supper, Erich (2001) “Is there Effectively a Level Playing Field for Developing Countries Exports?” UNCTAD , Policy Issues in International Trade and Commodities , Study Series No. 1.

  • Tinbergen, Jan (1962) Shaping the World Economy. Suggestions for an International Economic Policy. New York.

  • Ventura-Dias, Vivianne, Maria Cabezas, and Jaime Contador (1999) “Trade Reforms and Trade Patterns in Latin America.” Series de Comercio Internacional de la CEPAL, LC/L.1306-P/I.

  • WTO Trade Policy Review, European Union (1995, 1997, 2000) World Trade Organisation, Geneva.

  • Yeats, Alexander J. (1998) “Does MERCOSUR''s Trade Performance Raise Concerns about the Effects of Regional Rrade Arrangements?” The Word Bank Economic Review 12(1):1–28.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Martínez-Zarzoso, I., Nowak-Lehmann, F.D. Economic and Geographical Distance: Explaining Mercosur Sectoral Exports to the EU. Open Economies Review 15, 291–314 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:OPEN.0000037702.33704.20

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:OPEN.0000037702.33704.20

Navigation