Abstract
This article explores the interplay of local government policy and legitimacy from a broad postpositivist perspective where historical accounts and narratives are used in a complementary fashion. The basic assumption is that legitimacy is the product of satisfying felt needs and solving perceived problems. Health and social malaise problems and related policies of the past 120 years are analyzed in 50 Swedish municipalities. The analysis indicates that municipality policies respond to local problems only partly. Generally, local government policies responded dynamically to 'objective’ and perceived problems before the 1970s, but did not resolve the problems. Today’s legitimacy crisis could, to some extent, be explained by the discrepancy between high expectations created in the policy discourse and the central and local government’s incapacity to offer sustainable solutions to ongoing problems. It is suggested that if history is considered more seriously in public policy making it could help policy makers and citizens readjust expectations, illuminate the limits and prospects for public policy, and identify ways to restore legitimacy. Moreover, legitimacy could be restored if more realistic policies are worked out and if a new division of power between the levels of government is introduced.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Albaek, E. (1995). 'Between knowledge and power: Utilization of social science in public policy making,’ Policy Sciences 28: 79-100.
Bernstein, R. (1983). Beyond Objectivism and Relativism: Science, Hermeneutics, and Praxis. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Brewer, G. and P. deLeon (1983). The Foundations of Policy Analysis. Homewood, IL: Dorsey Press.
Bro, A. (2000). From Health Protection to Environmental Protection: A Historical Institutional Analysis of Municipal Responsibility Development. (Thesis in Swedish with English summary) Örebro: Örebro Studies in Political Sciences 1.
deLeon, P. (1994). 'Reinventing the policy sciences: Three steps back to the future,’ Policy Sciences 27: 77-95.
Dery, D. (1984). Problem Definition in Policy Analysis. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
Deutsch, K.W. (1970). Politics and Government: How People Decide Their Fate. Boston: Houghton Mfflin.
Dror, Y. (1983). Public Policy Making Reeaxamined. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.
Fischer, F. (1993). 'Reconstructing policy analysis: A postpositivist perspective,’ Policy Sciences 25: 333-339.
Fischer, F. (1995). Evaluating Public Policy. Chicago: Nelson Hall.
Fischer, F. (1998). 'Beyond empiricism: Policy inquiry in postpositivist perspective,’ Policy Studies Journal 26: 129-146.
Fischer, F. and J. Forester, eds. (1987). Confronting Values in Policy Analysis: The Politics of Criteria. London: Sage.
Fischer, F. and M. A. Hajer, eds. (1999). Living with Nature-Environmental Politics as Culture Discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Guba, E. G. (1980). 'The alternative paradigm dialog,’ in E. G. Guba, ed., The Paradigm Dialog. Newbury Park: Sage.
Gustafsson, G. (1980). Local Government Reforms in Sweden. Lund: Liber.
Hanberger, A. (1997). Prospects for Local Politics: Historical Policy Analysis of Problem Orientation and Effectiveness in Local policy and Implications for Political Legitimacy. (Thesis in Swedish) Department of Political Science, Umeafi University, Sweden.
Hanson, R. (1989). 'Democracy,’ in T. Ball, J. Farr and R. Hanson, eds., Political Innovation and Conceptual Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 68-89.
Heclo, H. (1972). 'Review article: Policy analysis,’ British Journal of Political Science 2: 83-108.
Henry, G. T., G. Julnes and M. Mark Melvin (1998). 'Realist evaluation: An emerging theory in support of practice,’ in New Directions for Evaluation, Nr 78. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Hill, M. (1997). The Policy Process in the Modern State (3rd ed.). Hemel Hempstead, UK: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
Hjern, B. and D. Porter (1983). 'Implementation structures: A new unit of administrative analysis,’ in B. Holzner, ed., Realizing Social Science Knowledge. Wien: Physica-Verlag.
Hogwood, B. W. and L. Gunn (1984). Policy Analysis for the Real World. London: Oxford University Press.
Krassner, S. D. (1988). 'Sovereignty: An institutional perspective,’ Comparative Political Studies 21: 66-94.
Lasswell, H. D. (1971). A Pre-view of Policy Sciences. New York: American Elsevier.
McCleary, R. and R. A. Hay (1980). Applied Time Series Analysis for the Social Sciences. Beverly Hills: Sage.
Myrdal, G. (1933). Wages, Cost of Living and National Income in Sweden 1860-1930. Stockholm: The Institute for Social Sciences, University of Stockholm.
Parsons, W. (1995). Public Policy: An Introduction to the Theory and Practice of Policy Analysis. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
Peters, B. G. (1999). Institutional Theory in Political Science-The 'New Institutionalism.' London: Pinter.
Pierson, P. (1992). '“Policy feed-backs” and political change: Contrasting Reagan and Thatcher's pension-reform initiatives,’ Studies in American Political Development 6: 359-390.
Primm, S. A. and T. W. Clark (1996). 'The Greater Yellowstone policy debate: What is the policy problem?’ Policy Sciences 29: 137-166.
Robertson, D. B. (1998). 'Introduction: Loss of confidence and policy change in the 1970s,’ in D. B. Robertson, ed., Loss of Confidence: Politics and Policy in the 1970s. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.
Sabatier, P. A. and H. C. Jenkins-Smith (1993). Policy Change and Learning: An Advocacy Coalition Approach. Boulder, Colorado: Westview.
Schneider, V. and R. Werle (1991). 'Policy networks in the German telecommunications domain,’ in B. Marin and R. Mayntz, eds., Policy Network: Empirical Evidence and Theoretical Considerations. Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press.
Schram, S. F. (1993). 'Postmodern policy analysis: Discourse and identity in welfare policy,’ Policy Sciences 26: 249-270.
SPSS (1993). SPSS for Windows Trends Release 6.0. Chicago: SPSS Inc.
Steinmo, S., K. Thelen and F. Longstreth (1992). Structuring Politics: Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Analysis. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Torgerson, D. (1985). 'Contextual orientation in policy analysis: The contribution of Harold D. Lasswell,’ Policy Sciences 18: 241-261.
Torgerson, D. (1986). 'Between knowledge and politics: Three faces of policy analysis,’ Policy Sciences 19: 33-59.
Torgerson, D. (1996). 'Power and insight in policy discourse: Post-positivism and problem definition,’ in H. M. Dobuzinskis and D. Laycock, eds., Policy Studies in Canada: The State of the Art. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Weber, M. (1962). Basic Concepts in Sociology. London: Peter Owen.
Weber, M. (1983). Ekonomi och samhälle: Förståendesociologins grunder. 1-Sociologiska begrepp och definitioner. Ekonomi, samhaällsordning och grupper. (Original text: Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft. Grundriss der verstehenden Soziologie). Lund: Argos.
Wiberg, M. (1988). Between Apathy and Revolution-Explications of the Conditions for Political Legitimacy. (Thesis), Turun Yliopisto, Turku.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hanberger, A. Public Policy and Legitimacy: A historical policy analysis of the interplay of public policy and legitimacy. Policy Sciences 36, 257–278 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:OLIC.0000017471.88620.9a
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:OLIC.0000017471.88620.9a