Natural Hazards

, Volume 32, Issue 1, pp 89–110 | Cite as

Poverty and Disasters in the United States: A Review of Recent Sociological Findings

  • Alice Fothergill
  • Lori A. Peek

Abstract

This article synthesizes the literature on poverty and disasters in the United States and presents the results from a wide range of studies conducted over the past twenty years. The findings are organized into eight categories based on the stages of a disaster event. The review illustrates how people of different socioeconomic statuses perceive, prepare for, and respond to natural hazard risks, how low-income populations may be differentially impacted, both physically and psychologically, and how disaster effects vary by social class during the periods of emergency response, recovery, and reconstruction. The literature illustrates that the poor in the United States are more vulnerable to natural disasters due to such factors as place and type of residence, building construction, and social exclusion. The results have important implications for social equity and recommendations for future research and policy implementation are offered.

natural disasters poverty social equity socioeconomic status United States 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aguirre, B. E.: 1988, The lack of warnings before the Saragosa Tornado, International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters 6(1), 65–74.Google Scholar
  2. Aptekar, L.: 1991, The psychosocial process of adjusting to natural disasters, Working Paper No. 70, University of Colorado, Institute of Behavioral Science, Natural Hazards Research and Applications Information Center, Boulder.Google Scholar
  3. Aptekar, L.: 1990, A comparison of the bicoastal disasters of 1989, Behavioral Science Research 24(1–4), 73–104.Google Scholar
  4. Aptekar, L. and Boore, J. A.: 1990, The emotional effects of disaster on children: A review of the literature, International Journal of Mental Health 19(2), 77–90.Google Scholar
  5. Austin, R. and Schill, M.: 1994, Unequal Protection, Sierra Club Books, San Francisco.Google Scholar
  6. Babbie, E. R.: 1998, The Practice of Social Research, 8th ed., Wadsworth Publishing Company, Belmont, CA.Google Scholar
  7. Bates, F. L. and Peacock, W. G.: 1993, Living Conditions, Disasters, and Development: An Approach to Cross-Cultural Comparisons, University of Georgia Press, Athens, GA.Google Scholar
  8. Beach, H. D. and Lucas R. (eds): 1960, Individual and Group Behavior in a Coal Mine Disaster, National Academy of Sciences, National Research Council, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  9. Blaikie, P., Cannon T., Davis, I., and Wisner, B.: 1994, At Risk: Natural Hazards, People's Vulnerability, and Disasters, Routledge, New York.Google Scholar
  10. Bolin, R.: 1993, Household and Community Recovery After Earthquakes, Program on Environment and Behavior Monograph No. 56, University of Colorado, Institute of Behavioral Science, Natural Hazards Research and Applications Information Center, Boulder.Google Scholar
  11. Bolin, R.: 1986, Disaster impact and recovery: A comparison of black and white victims, International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters 4(1), 35–50.Google Scholar
  12. Bolin, R.: 1982, Long-Term Family Recovery from Disaster, Program on Environment and Behavior Monograph No. 36, University of Colorado, Institute of Behavioral Science, Natural Hazards Research and Applications Information Center, Boulder.Google Scholar
  13. Bolin, R. and Bolton, P.: 1986, Race, Religion, and Ethnicity in Disaster Recovery, Program on Environment and Behavior Monograph No. 42, University of Colorado, Institute of Behavioral Science, Natural Hazards Research and Applications Information Center, Boulder.Google Scholar
  14. Bolin, R. with Stanford, L.: 1998, The Northridge Earthquake: Vulnerability and Disaster, Routledge, New York.Google Scholar
  15. Bolin, R. and Stanford, L. M.: 1993, Emergency sheltering and housing of earthquake victims: The case of Santa Cruz County, In: P. A. Bolton (ed.), The Loma Prieta, California, Earthquake of October 17, 1989: Public Response, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC, pp. B43–B50.Google Scholar
  16. Bolin, R. and Stanford, L.: 1991, Shelter, housing and recovery: A comparison of U.S. disasters, Disasters: The Journal of Disaster Studies and Management 15, 24–34.Google Scholar
  17. Bolin, R. and Stanford L.: 1990, Shelter and housing issues in Santa Cruz County, In: R. Bolin (ed), The Loma Prieta Earthquake, University of Colorado, Institute of Behavioral Science, Boulder, pp. 99–108.Google Scholar
  18. Bolton, P. A., Liebow, E. B., and Olson, J. L.: 1993, Community context and uncertainty following a damaging earthquake: Low-income Latinos in Los Angeles, California, The Environmental Professional 15, 240–247.Google Scholar
  19. Bourque, L. B., Russell, L. A., and Goltz, J. D.: 1993, Human behavior during and immediately after the earthquake, In: P. A. Bolton (ed), The Loma Prieta, California, Earthquake of October 17, 1989: Public Response, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC, pp. B3–B22.Google Scholar
  20. Childers, C. D.: 1999, Elderly female-headed households in the disaster loan process, International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters 17(1), 99–110.Google Scholar
  21. Colorado State University: 1985, Unmet Needs of Disaster Victims in the United States, Final Report prepared for the National Voluntary Organizations Active in Disaster, Hazards Assessment Laboratory, Colorado State University, Fort Collins.Google Scholar
  22. Comerio, M. C., Landis, J. D., and Rofe, Y.: 1994, Post-Disaster Residential Rebuilding, Working Paper 608, Institute of Urban and Regional Development, University of California, Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar
  23. Cooper, F. and Laughy, L.: 1994, Managing Hazards in a Changing Multinational World, unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
  24. Couch, S. R. and Kroll-Smith, J. S.: 1985, The chronic technical disaster: Toward a social scientific perspective, Social Science Quarterly 66, 564–575.Google Scholar
  25. Dash, N., Peacock, W.G., and Morrow, B. H.: 1997, And the poor get poorer: A neglected black community, In: W. G. Peacock et al. (eds), Hurricane Andrew: Ethnicity, Gender, and the Sociology of Disasters, Routledge, New York, pp. 206–225.Google Scholar
  26. Drabek, T. E.: 1986, Human System Responses to Disaster: An Inventory of Sociological Findings, Springer-Verlag, New York.Google Scholar
  27. Enarson, E.: 1999a, Women and housing issues in two U.S. disasters: Hurricane Andrew and the Red River Valley Flood, International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters 17(1), 39–64.Google Scholar
  28. Enarson, E.: 1999b, Women, work, and family in the 1997 Red River Valley Flood: Ten lessons learned, unpublished report.Google Scholar
  29. Enarson, E.: 1998, Through women's eyes: A gendered research agenda for disaster social science, Disasters 22(2), 157–173.Google Scholar
  30. Enarson, E. and Fordham, M.: 2001, Line that divide, ties that bind: Race, class, and gender in women's flood recovery in the US and UK, The Australian Journal of Emergency Management 15(4), 43–53.Google Scholar
  31. Enarson, E. and Morrow, B. H. (eds): 1998, The Gendered Terrain of Disaster: Through Women's Eyes, Praeger Publishers, Westport, CT.Google Scholar
  32. Federal Emergency Management Agency: 1990, Interagency Hazard Mitigation Team Report. Hurricane Hugo, Report #843 DR/SC, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  33. Flynn, J., Slovic, P., and Mertz, C. K.: 1994, Gender, race, and perception of environmental health risks, Risk Analysis 14(6), 1101–1108.Google Scholar
  34. Fordham, M.: 1999, The intersection of gender and social class in disaster: Balancing resilience and vulnerability, International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters 17(1), 15–38.Google Scholar
  35. Fothergill, A.: 2004, Heads Above Water: Gender, Class, and Family in the Grand Forks Flood, State University of New York Press, Albany, NY.Google Scholar
  36. Fothergill, A.: 1999, An exploratory study of woman battering in the Grand Forks Flood disaster: Implications for community responses and policies, International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters 17(1), 79–98.Google Scholar
  37. Fothergill, A.: 1998, The neglect of gender in disaster work: An overview of the literature, In: E. Enarson and B. H. Morrow (eds), The Gendered Terrain of Disaster: Through Women's Eyes, Praeger Publishers, Westport, CT, pp. 63–84.Google Scholar
  38. Fothergill, A.: 1996, Gender, risk, and disaster, International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters 14(1), 33–56.Google Scholar
  39. Fothergill, A., Maestas, E., and Darlington, J. D.: 1999, Race, ethnicity and disasters in the United States: A review of the literature, Disasters 23(2), 156–173.Google Scholar
  40. Fritz, C.: 1961, Disaster, In: R. K. Merton and R. A. Nisbet (eds), Contemporary Social Problems, Harcourt Press, New York, pp. 651–694.Google Scholar
  41. Garrison, J. L.: 1985, Mental health implications of disaster relocation in the United States: A review of the literature, International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters 3(2), 49–65.Google Scholar
  42. Gelles, R. J. and Cornell, C. P.: 1985, Intimate Violence in Families, Sage Publications, Beverly Hills, CA.Google Scholar
  43. Gladwin, H. and Peacock, W. G.: 1997, Warning and evacuation: A night for hard houses, In: W. G. Peacock et al. (eds), Hurricane Andrew: Ethnicity, Gender, and the Sociology of Disasters, Routledge, New York, pp. 52–74.Google Scholar
  44. Greene, M.: 1992, Housing recovery and reconstruction: Lessons from recent urban earthquakes, In: Proceedings of the 3rd U.S./Japan Workshop on Urban Earthquakes, Oakland, CA: Earthquake Engineering Research Institute (EERI) Publication No. 93-B.Google Scholar
  45. Greene, M., Perry, R., and Lindell, M.: 1981, The March 1980 eruptions of Mt. St. Helens: Citizen perceptions of volcano threat, Disasters 5(1), 49–66.Google Scholar
  46. Hewitt, K.: 1997, Regions of Risk: A Geographical Introduction to Disasters, Longman, London.Google Scholar
  47. Katayama, T.: 1992, Aftermath of the Loma Prieta Earthquake: How Radio Responded to the Disaster. INCEDE Report No. 2.Google Scholar
  48. Klinenberg, E.: 2002, Heat Wave: A Social Autopsy of Disaster in Chicago, Chicago, University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  49. Kunreuther, H., Ginsberg, R., Miller, L., Sagi, P., Slovic, P., Borkan, B., and Katz, N.: 1978, Disaster Insurance Protection: Public Policy Lessons, John Wiley and Sons, New York.Google Scholar
  50. Lamson, C.: 1983, ‘I think they're all caught up’: An inquiry of hazard perception among Newfoundland and inshore fishermen, Environment and Behavior 15, 458–486.Google Scholar
  51. Mack, R.W. and Baker, G.W.: 1961, The Occasion Instant, National Academy of Sciences/National Research Council Disaster Study #15, National Academy of Sciences, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  52. Merton, R. K.: 1969, Foreword, In: A. H. Barton, Communities in Disaster, Doubleday, New York, pp. vii–xxxvii.Google Scholar
  53. Mileti, D. S.: 1999, Disasters By Design: A Reassessment of Natural Hazards in the United States, Joseph Henry Press, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  54. Mileti, D. S., Drabek, T. E., and Haas, J. E.: 1975, Human Systems in Extreme Environments: A Sociological Perspective, Program on Environment and Behavior Monograph No. 21, University of Colorado, Institute of Behavioral Science, Natural Hazards Research and Applications Information Center, Boulder.Google Scholar
  55. Mileti, D. S., Sorensen, J. H., and O'Brien, P. W.: 1992, Toward an explanation of mass care shelter use in evacuations, International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters 10(1), 25–42.Google Scholar
  56. Miller, K. S. and Simile, C.: 1992, ‘They Could See Stars From Their Beds’: The Plight of the Rural Poor in the Aftermath of Hurricane Hugo, Westview Press, Boulder, CO.Google Scholar
  57. Moore, H. E.: 1958, Tornadoes Over Texas, University of Texas Press, Austin.Google Scholar
  58. Morrow, B. H.: 1999, Identifying and mapping community vulnerability, Disasters 23(1), 1–18.Google Scholar
  59. Morrow, B. H.: 1999, Disaster in the first person, In: W. G. Peacock et al. (eds), Hurricane Andrew: Ethnicity, Gender, and the Sociology of Disaster, Routledge, New York, pp. 1–19.Google Scholar
  60. Morrow, B. H.: 1997, Stretching the bonds: The families of Andrew, In: W. G. Peacock et al. (eds), Hurricane Andrew: Ethnicity, Gender, and the Sociology of Disasters, Routledge, New York, pp. 141–170.Google Scholar
  61. Morrow, B. H. and Enarson, E.: 1996, Hurricane Andrew through women's eyes: Issues and recommendations, International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters 14(1), 5–22.Google Scholar
  62. Muller, L. A. and Mulhern, P. F.: 1977, 1976 Big Thompson Flood and Flood Recovery Planning. Preprint No. 3105, American Society of Civil Engineers, New York.Google Scholar
  63. Neal, D. M.: 1997, Reconsidering the phases of disaster, International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters 15(2), 239–264.Google Scholar
  64. Nigg, J.: 1982, Awareness and behavior: Public response to prediction awareness, In: T. F. Saarinen (ed), Perspectives on Increasing Hazard Awareness, University of Colorado, Institute of Behavioral Science, Natural Hazards Research and Applications Information Center, Boulder, pp. 71–96Google Scholar
  65. Palm, R. and Carroll, J.: 1998, Illusions of Safety: Culture and Earthquake Hazard Response in California and Japan, Westview Press, Boulder, CO.Google Scholar
  66. Panel on the Public Policy Implications of Earthquake Prediction: 1975, Earthquake Prediction and Public Policy, National Academy of Sciences, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  67. Peacock, W. G., Morrow, B. H., and Gladwin, H.: 1997, Hurricane Andrew: Ethnicity, Gender, and the Sociology of Disasters, Routledge, New York.Google Scholar
  68. Peacock, W. G., with Ragsdale, A. K.: 1997, Social systems, ecological networks, and disasters: Toward a socio-political ecology of disasters, In: W. G. Peacock et al. (eds), Hurricane Andrew: Ethnicity, Gender, and the Sociology of Disasters, Routledge, New York.Google Scholar
  69. Perry, R. W.: 1987, Disaster preparedness and response among minority citizens, In: R. R. Dynes et al. (eds), Sociology of Disaster: Contribution of Sociology to Disaster Research, Franco Angeli, Milan, Italy, pp. 135–152.Google Scholar
  70. Perry, R. W. and Lindell, M. K.: 1991, The effects of ethnicity on decision-making, International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters 9(1), 47–68.Google Scholar
  71. Phillips, B. D.: 1998, Sheltering and housing of low-income and minority groups in Santa Cruz county after the Loma Prieta earthquake, In: J. Nigg (ed.), The Loma Prieta, California, Earthquake of October 17, 1989 — Recovery, Mitigation, and Reconstruction, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC, pp. D17–D28.Google Scholar
  72. Phillips, B. D.: 1993, Cultural diversity in disasters: Sheltering, housing, and long term recovery, International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters 11(1), 99–110.Google Scholar
  73. Phillips, B. and Ephraim, M.: 1992, Living in the Aftermath: Blaming Processes in the Loma Prieta Earthquake, Working Paper No. 80, University of Colorado, Institute of Behavioral Science, Natural Hazards Research and Applications Information Center, Boulder.Google Scholar
  74. Pilisuk, M., Parks, S. H., and Hawkes, G.: 1987, Public perception of technological risk, Social Science Journal 24(4), 403–413.Google Scholar
  75. Quarantelli, E. L.: 1994, Technological and natural disasters and ecological problems: Similarities and differences in planning for and managing them, Article #262, University of Delaware Disaster Research Center, Reprinted from Memoria del Coloquio Internacional: El Reto de Desastres Technologicos. Mexico City, Mexico: Academia Mexicana de Ingenieria, pp. 87–112. (Without references; for them see DRC Preliminary Paper #192).Google Scholar
  76. Rodrigue, C. M. and Rovai, E.: 1994, The ‘Northridge’ Earthquake: Differential Geographies of Damage, Media Attention, and Recovery, unpublished Paper.Google Scholar
  77. Rossi, P. H., Wright, J. D., Weber-Burdin, E., and Pereira, J.: 1983, Victims of the Environment: Loss from Natural Hazards in the United States, 1970–1980, Plenum Press, New York.Google Scholar
  78. Rovai, E.: 1994, The Social Geography of Disaster Recovery: Differential Community Response to the North Coast Earthquakes, Association of Pacific Coast Geographers: Yearbook 56.Google Scholar
  79. Rubin, C. B. and Popkin, R.: 1990, Disaster Recovery After Hurricane Hugo in South Carolina, Working Paper No. 69, University of Colorado, Institute of Behavioral Science, Natural Hazards Research and Applications Information Center, Boulder.Google Scholar
  80. Subervi-Velez, F. A., Denney, M., Ozuna, A., and Quintero, C.: 1992, Communicating with California's Spanish-Speaking Populations: Assessing the Role of the Spanish-Language Broadcast Media and Selected Agencies in Providing Emergency Services. California Policy Seminar Report, Berkeley.Google Scholar
  81. Tierney, K.: 1988, The Whittier Narrows, California earthquake of October 1, 1987 — Social aspects, Earthquake Spectra 4(1), 11–23.Google Scholar
  82. Turner, R. H., Nigg, J. M., and Paz, D. H.: 1986, Waiting for Disaster: Earthquake Watch in California, University of California Press, Berkeley.Google Scholar
  83. U.S. Bureau of Statistics: 1998, Census Data 1998, Government Accounting Office, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  84. U.S. Bureau of Statistics: 1994, Census Data 1994, Government Accounting Office, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  85. U.S. Department of Commerce, National Weather Service's Office of Meteorology: 1995, A Summary of Natural Hazard Fatalities for 1994 in the United States, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  86. U.S. Government Hearings: 1990, Housing Needs in Earthquake Disaster Areas, No. 101–115, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  87. U.S. House of Representatives: 1980, Federal Efforts to Aid Low-Income and Elderly Individuals Affected by Life-Threatening Heat Conditions, 96th Congress, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  88. Vaughan, E.: 1995, The significance of socioeconomic and ethnic diversity for the risk communication process, Risk Analysis 15(2), 169–180.Google Scholar
  89. White, G. F. (ed.): 1974, Natural Hazards: Local, National, Global, Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  90. Wright, J. D.: 1988, The worthy and unworthy homeless, Science 25, 64–69.Google Scholar
  91. Wright, J. D.: 1989, Address Unknown, Aldine de Gruyter, New York.Google Scholar
  92. Yelvington, K. A.: 1997, Coping in a temporary way: The tent cities, In: W. G. Peacock et al. (eds), Hurricane Andrew: Ethnicity, Gender, and the Sociology of Disasters, Routledge, New York, pp. 92–115.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alice Fothergill
    • 1
  • Lori A. Peek
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of SociologyUniversity of VermontU. S. A

Personalised recommendations