Skip to main content
Log in

Stimulation of the Immune Response During Activation of the Dopaminergic System in Mice with Opposite Types of Behavior

  • Published:
Neuroscience and Behavioral Physiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Studies reported here demonstrated that activation of the dopaminergic system induces increases in the immune response regardless of the type of behavior in mice (line CBA), i.e., in aggressive mice, submissive mice, and mice lacking experience of victory or defeat (controls). Changes in the activity of the dopaminergic system were induced with SKF-38393, a selective agonist of dopamine D1 receptors, and with p-chlorophenylalanine (PCPA), which we have previously shown to activate D2 receptors. In the aggressive form of behavior, which was characterized by strong (compared with controls) immune responses, SKF-38393 and PCPA led to further increases in the immune response. In submissive mice, activation of the dopaminergic system altered the nature of the immune response, with immunostimulation, as in aggression. It is suggested that activation of the dopaminergic system in conditions of defined psychoemotional status fixed by acquisition of opposite types of behavior, induces the formation of a new neurochemical pattern – the dopaminergic set – which led to changes in the nature and intensity of the immune response.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. L. V. Devoino, E. L. Al'perina, E. K. Podgornaya, O. V. Polyakov, G. V. Idova, and R. Yu. Il'yuchenok, “Involvement of dopaminergic systems in the functional specialization of brain areas during the formation of aggressive and submissive behavior in mice,” Zh. Vyssh. Nerv. Deyat., 51,No. 2, 197–205 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  2. L. V. Devoino, E. L. Al'perina, E. K. Podgornaya, O. V. Polyakov, G. V. Idova, and R. Yu. Il'yuchenok, “Characteristics of the distribution of serotonin and its metabolites in brain structures and the development of immunosuppression in submissive mice,” Ros. Fiziol. Zh. im. I. M. Sechenova, 88,No. 1, 106–112 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  3. L. V. Devoino, G. V. Idova, E. L. Al'perina, and M. A. Cheido, “Neurochemical systems of the brain — the extraimmune mechanism of psychoneuroimmunomodulation,” Vestn. Ros. Akad. Med. Nauk., 9, 19–24 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  4. L. V. Devoino, and R. Yu. Il'yuchenok, Neurotransmitter Systems in Psychoneuroimmunomodulation: Dopamine, Serotonin, GABA, Neuropeptides [in Russian], TsÉRIS, Novosibirsk (1993), p. 237.

    Google Scholar 

  5. G. V. Idova, M. A. Cheido, and L. V. Devoino, “IgM-and IgG-rosette formation in the primary and secondary immune responses in a system consisting of syngeneic transfer of spleen cells,” Zh. Mikrobiol., 2, 57–60 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  6. N. N. Kudryavtseva and I. V. Bakshtanovskaya, “Neurochemical control of aggression and submission,” Zh. Vyssh. Nerv. Deyat., 40,No. 3, 459–466 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  7. G. N. Kryzhanovskii, S. V. Magaeva, and S. V. Makarov, Neuroimmunopathology [in Russian], Moscow (1997).

  8. S. Basu and P. S. Dasgupta, “Dopamine, a neurotransmitter, influences the immune system,” J. Neuroimmunol., 102,No. 2, 113–124 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  9. D. C. Blanchard, P. Chollvanich, R. J. Blanchard, D. W. Chow, R. P. Hammer, J. K. Rowlett, and M. T. Bardo, “Serotonin, but not dopamine, metabolites are increased in selected brain regions of subordinate male rats in a colony environment,” Brain Res., 568, 61–66 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  10. A. J. Cunningham, “A method of increased sensitivity for detecting single antibody-forming cells,” Nature, 207, 1106–1107 (1965).

    Google Scholar 

  11. L. Devoino, E. Alperina, N. Kudryavtseva, and N. Popova, “Immune responses in male mice with aggressive and submissive behaviour patterns: strain differences,” Brain Behav. Immun., 7, 91–96 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  12. L. Devoino, G. Idova, E. Alperina, and M. Cheido, “Brain neuromediator systems in the immune response control: pharmacological analysis of pre-and postsynaptic mechanisms,” Brain Res., 633, 267–274 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  13. R. Hitzemann, K. Dains, C. Bier-Langing, and N. R. Zahniser, “On the selection of mice for haloperidol response and non-response,” Psychopharmacol., 103, 244–250 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  14. G. Idova, M. Cheido, and L. Devoino, “Modulation of the immune response by changing neuromediators systems activity under stress,” Int. J. Immunopharmacol., 19,No. 9–10, 535–540 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  15. K. A. Miczek, J. F. DeBold, and A. M. M. van Erp, “Neuropharmacological characteristics of individual differences in alcohol effects on aggression in rodents and primates,” 5, 407–421 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  16. E. M. Nikulina and N. S. Kapralova, “Role of dopamine receptors in the regulation of aggression in mice: relationship of genotype,” Neurosci. Behav. Physiol., 22,No. 5, 364–369 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  17. G. Nistico, M. C. Caroleo, M. Arbitrio, and L. Pulvirenti, “Dopamine D1-receptors in the amygdala enhance the immune response in the rat,” Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci., 741, 316–323 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  18. G. Nistico, M. C. Caroleo, M. Arbitrio, and L. Pulvirenti, “Evidence for an involvement of dopamine D1-receptors in the limbic system in the control of immune mechanisms,” Neuroimmunomodulation, 1,No. 3, 174–180 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  19. J. M. Petitto, J. L. Gariepy, P. L. Gendreau, M. H. Lewis, and D. T. Lysle, “Differences in NK cell function in mice bred for high and low aggression: genetic linkage between complex behavioral and immunological traits?” Brain Behav. Immun., 13,No. 2, 175–186 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  20. F. Richard, J. L. Sanne, O. Bourde, D. Weissman, M. Ehret, C. Cash, M. Maitre, and J. F. Pujol, “Variation of tryptophan-5-hydrolase concentrations in the rat raphe dorsalis nucleus after p-chlorophenylalanine administration. 1. A model to study the turnover of the enzymatic protein,” Brain Res., 536, 41–45 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  21. V. Stefanski, “Social stress in laboratory rats: behaviour, immune function, and tumour metastasis,” Physiol. Behav., 73,No. 3, 385–391 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  22. C. W. Tsao, Y. S Lin, and J. T. Cheng, “Effect of dopamine on immune cell proliferation in mice,” Life Sci., 61,No. 24, 361–371 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  23. M. Tuchscherer, B. Puppe, A. Tuchscherer, and E. Kanitz, “Effects of social status after mixing on immune, metabolic, and endocrine responses in pigs,” Physiol. Behav., 64,No. 3, 353–360 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Idova, G.V., Cheido, M.A., Zhukova, E.N. et al. Stimulation of the Immune Response During Activation of the Dopaminergic System in Mice with Opposite Types of Behavior. Neurosci Behav Physiol 34, 417–421 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:NEAB.0000018755.99063.05

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:NEAB.0000018755.99063.05

Navigation