Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Sociocultural Meanings of Nanotechnology: Research Methodologies

  • Published:
Journal of Nanoparticle Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article identifies six social-science research methodologies that will be useful for charting the sociocultural meaning of nanotechnology: web-based questionnaires, vignette experiments, analysis of web linkages, recommender systems, quantitative content analysis, and qualitative textual analysis. Data from a range of sources are used to illustrate how the methods can delineate the intellectual content and institutional structure of the emerging nanotechnology culture. Such methods will make it possible in future to test hypotheses such as that there are two competing definitions of nanotechnology – the technical-scientific and the science-fiction – that are influencing public perceptions by different routes and in different directions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alexander, C. S., & H. J. Becker, 1978. The Use of Vignettes in Survey Research. Public Opinion Quarterly 42, 93–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, W. I., 2003. Nanocosm:Nanotechnology and the big changes coming from the inconceivably small. AMACOM /American Management Association, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bainbridge, W. S., 1986. Dimensions of Science Fiction. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bainbridge, W. S., 1989. Survey Research:A Computer-Assisted Introduction. Wadsworth, Belmont, California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bainbridge, W. S., 1991. Goals in Space. SUNY Press, Albany, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bainbridge, W. S., 1992. Social Research Methods and Statistics:A Computer-Assisted Introduction. Wadsworth, Belmont, California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bainbridge, W. S., 2000. Religious ethnography on the World Wide Web, In:Hadden, J. K. and Cowan, D. eds., Religion and the Internet JAI Press, Greenwich, Connecticut.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bainbridge, W. S., 2002a. Public attitudes toward nanotechnology, J. Nanoparticle Res. 4, 561–570.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bainbridge, W. S., 2002b. Validity of Web-Based Surveys, In O. V. Burton eds. Computing in the Social Sciences and Humanities, University of Illinois Press, Urbana. pp. 51–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bainbridge, W. S., 2003. The Future of the Internet. In: Howard, P. N. and Jones, S. eds., Society Online, Thousand Oaks, Sage, California pp. 307–324.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bear, G., 1983. Blood Music (novelette version), Analog 106, 12–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bear, G., 2002. Blood Music (novel version). Simon and Schuster, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Best, S. J., B. Krueger, C. Hubbard & A. Smith, 2001. An assessment of the generalizability of internet surveys, Social Sci. Comput. Rev. 19, 131–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burt, R. S., 1980. Models of network structure, Ann. Rev. Sociol. 6, 79–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carmines, E., & R. Zeller, 1979. Reliability Assessment. Sage, Beverly Hills, California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, G. P., 2001. Shamans of small, Sci. Am. 285, 86–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crandall, B. C. (ed. ), 1996. Nanotechnology:Molecular Speculations on Global Abundance. MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crichton, M., 1990. Jurassic Park. Knopf, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crichton, M., 2002. Prey. Harper Collins, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronbach, L. J. 1951. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests, Psychometrica 16(3), 297–334.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dooley, P. C., 1969. The interlocking directorate, Am. Economic Rev. 59(3), 314–323.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drexler, K. E., 1992. Nanosystems:Molecular Machinery, Manufacturing, and Computation. Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Du Charme, W. M., 1995. Becoming Immortal:Nanotechnology, You, and the Demise of Death. Blue Creek Ventures, Evergreen, Colorado.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fishbine, G., 2002. The Investor ‘s Guide to Nanotechnology and Micromachines. Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flynn, J., P. Slovic & C. K. Mertz. 1994. Gender, race, and perception of environmental health risks, Risk Anal. 14(6), 1101–1108.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Freitas, R. A., 1999. Nanomedicine. Landes Bioscience, Austin, Texas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fritz, S. (ed. ), 2002. Understanding Nanotechnology:From the Editors of Scientific American. Warner Books, 2002, New York.

  • Gaskell, G., N. Allum & S. Stares, 2003. Europeans and Biotechnology in 2002:Eurobarometer 58–0. London School of Economics, Methodology Institute, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goonan, K. A., 1994. Queen City Jazz. Tor, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goonan, K. A., 1997. Mississippi Blues. Tor, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goonan, K. A., 2000. Crescent City Rhapsody. Eos, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goonan, K. A., 2002. Light Music. Eos, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gross, M., 1999. Travels to the Nanoworld:Miniature Machinery in Nature and Technology. Plenum press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joy, B., 2000. Why the Future Does not Need Us, Wired, April.

  • Landauer, T. K., P. W. Foltz & D. Laham, 1998. An introduction to latent semantic analysis Discourse Process. 25, 259–284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyshevski, S. E., 2001. Nano-and Microelectromechanical Systems:Fundamentals of Nano-and Microengineering. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsden, P. V., 1990. Network data and measurement, Ann. Rev. Sociol. 16, 435–463.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mizruchi, M. S., 1996. What do interlocks do?An analysis, critique, and assessment of research on interlocking directorates, Ann. Rev. Sociol. 22, 271–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moskowitz, S., 1963. Explorers of the Infinite. Meridian, Cleveland, Ohio.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulhall, D., 2002. Our Molecular Future:How Nanotechnology, Robotics, Genetics, and Artificial Intelligence Will Transform our World. Prometheus Books, Amherst, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Science and Technology Council (NSTC), subcommittee on nanoscale science, engineering and technology), 2000.

  • National Nanotechnology Initiative:The initiative and its implementation plan. White House, Washington, DC.

  • National Science Board, 2002. Science and Engineering Indicators. 2002. National Science Foundation, Arlington, Virginia.

  • National Science Foundation, 2003. Online database of award abstracts at https://www. fastlane. nsf. gov/a6/A6AwardSearch. htm.

  • Poole, C. P., & F. J. Owens, 2003. troduction to Nanotechnology Wiley, Hoboken, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ratner, M. A., & D. Ratner, 2003. Nanotechnology:A Gentle Introduction to the Next Big Idea. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ratner, M. A., & D. Ratner, 2004. Nanotechnology and Homeland Security:New Weapons, New War. Prentice-Hall/PTR, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Regis, E., 1995. Nano:The Emerging Science of Nanotechnology. Little, Brown, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roco, M., & R. Tomellini, 2002. Nanotechnology:Revolutionary Opportunities and Societal Implications. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities Luxembourg.

  • Roco, M. C., R. S. Williams & P. Alivisatos eds., 2000. Nanotechnology research directions. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roco, M. C., & W. S. Bainbridge eds., 2001. Societal implications of nanoscience and nanotechnology. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roco, M. C., & W. S. Bainbridge eds., 2003. Converging Technologies for Improving Human Performance. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Royal Society and Royal Academy of Engineering, 2003. Nanotechnology:Views of Scientists and Engineers. http://www. nanotec. org. uk/SEworkshopReport1. pdf.

  • Savage, M. T., 1994. The Millennial Project:Colonizing the Galaxy in Eight Easy Steps. Little, Brown, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegel, R. W., E. Hu & M. C. Roco, eds., 1999. Nanostructure science and technology. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sniderman, P. M., & D. B. Grob, 1996. Innovations in Experimental Design in Attitude Surveys, Ann. Rev. Sociol. 22, 377–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stone, P. J., D. C. Dunphy, M. S. Smith & D. M. Ogilvie, 1966. The General Inquirer:A Computer Approach to Content Analysis. Cambridge, MA M. I. T. Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Timp, G. (ed. ), 1999. Nanotechnology. AIP Press, Springer-Verlag New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uldrich, J., & D. Newberry, 2003. The Next Big Thing is Really Small:How Nanotechnology will Change the Future of your Business. Crown Business, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, E. O., 1998. Consilience:The Unity of Knowledge. Knopf, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, M. (ed. ), 2002. Nanotechnology:Basic Science and Emerging Technologies. Chapman & Hall/CRC press, Boca Raton, Florida.

    Google Scholar 

  • Witte, J. C., 2003. The case for multimethod design. In:Howard P. N., and Jones, S Society Online,. Thousand Oaks, Sage, California, pp. xv. xxxiv.

    Google Scholar 

  • Witte, J. C., L. M. Amoroso & P. E. N. Howard, 2000. Method and representation in internet-based survey tools:Mobility, community, and cultural identity in survey 2000, Social Sci. Comput. Rev. 18(2), 179–195.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Information and Intelligent Systems, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA, 22230, USA; E-mail:

    William Sims Bainbridge

Authors
  1. William Sims Bainbridge
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bainbridge, W.S. Sociocultural Meanings of Nanotechnology: Research Methodologies. J Nanopart Res 6, 285–299 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:NANO.0000034744.83327.fa

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:NANO.0000034744.83327.fa

Search

Navigation