Natural Language & Linguistic Theory

, Volume 22, Issue 3, pp 453–480 | Cite as

Conditions on Agreement in Japanese

  • Cedric Boeckx
  • Fumikazu Niinuma
Article

Abstract

This paper integrates Japanese object honorification within a larger cross-linguistic context, and provides a principled explanation for an otherwise puzzling property: the fact that direct object honorification is blocked in the presence of a dative argument. Following a well-established tradition in the generative literature, we regard honorification as a case of agreement, but, unlikeprevious approaches, which rely on Spec-Head configurations, we show that Chomsky's (2000) Agree mechanism suffices for (object) agreement to obtain. We argue that the blocking effect of dative elements is a reflex of a more general locality constraint, `defective intervention', proposed by Chomsky 2000. The analysis also provides a compelling argument in favor of taking the 〈indirect object; direct object〉 order in Japanese as basic, and against base-generation approaches to scrambling.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Baker, Mark, Kyle Johnson, and Ian Roberts. 1989. 'Passive Arguments Raised', Linguistic Inquiry 20, 214–251.Google Scholar
  2. Belletti, Adriana. 2000. 'Agreement Projections', in M. Baltin and C. Collins (eds.), Handbook of Contemporary Syntactic Theory, Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 483–510.Google Scholar
  3. Boeckx, Cedric. 2000. 'Quirky Agreement', Studia Linguistica 53, 354–380.Google Scholar
  4. Boeckx, Cedric. 2001a. EPP Eliminated, ms., University of Connecticut. [A revised version to appear in N. Hornstein and J. Vriagereka (eds.), The Minimalist Fact, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.]Google Scholar
  5. Boeckx, Cedric. 2001b. Mechanisms of Chain Formation, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Connecticut.Google Scholar
  6. Boeckx, Cedric. 2003b. 'Symmetries and Asymmetries in Multiple Checking', in C. Boeckx and K.K. Grohmann (eds.), Multiple Wh-fronting, John Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp. 1–12.Google Scholar
  7. Boekx, Cedric. 2003a. Islands and Chains, John Benjamins, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  8. Boeckx, Cedric, and Youngmi Jeong. 2002. Refining Syntactic Intervention, ms., University of Maryland.Google Scholar
  9. Boeckx, Cedric. 2003c. Intricacies of Icelandic Agreement, ms., University of Maryland.Google Scholar
  10. Boeckx, Cedric, and Youngmi Jeong. In preparation. Nominative Objects in Japanese: Principles and Parameters, ms., University of Maryland.Google Scholar
  11. Bonet, Eulalia. 1994. 'The Person-Case Constraint: Morphology or Syntax?', in MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 22, MITWPL, Cambridge, MA, pp. 33–52.Google Scholar
  12. Bošković, Željko. 1997. The Syntax of Non-finite Complementation: An Economy Approach, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  13. Bošković, Željko. 2000. 'On Multiple Feature Checking: Multiple wh-fronting and Multiple Head Movement', in S. D. Epstein and N. Hornstein (eds.), Working Minimalism, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 159–187.Google Scholar
  14. Bošković, Željko. 2002. 'A-movement and the EPP', Syntax 5, 167–218.Google Scholar
  15. Bošković, Željko, and Daiko Takahashi. 1998. 'Scrambling and Last Resort', Linguistic Inquiry 29, 343–366.Google Scholar
  16. Bures, Anton. 1992. Recycling Expletives (and Other) Sentences, ms., MIT.Google Scholar
  17. Chomsky, Noam. 1993. 'A Minimalist Program for Linguistic Theory', in K. Hale and S. J. Keyser (eds.), The View from Building 20, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 1–52.Google Scholar
  18. Chomsky, Noam. 2000. 'Minimalist Inquiries: The Framework', in R. Martin, D. Michaels, and J. Uriagereka (eds.), Step by Step, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 89–151.Google Scholar
  19. Chomsky, Noam. 2001a. 'Derivation by Phase', in M. Kenstowicz (ed.), Ken Hale: A Life in Language, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 1–52.Google Scholar
  20. Chomsky, Noam. 2001b. 'Beyond Explanatory Adequacy,' ms., MIT. [To appear in A. Belletti (ed.), Structures and Beyond, Oxford University Press, Oxford.]Google Scholar
  21. Collins, Chris. 1994. 'Economy of Derivation and the Generalized Proper Binding Condition', Linguistic Inquiry 25, 45–61.Google Scholar
  22. Collins, Chris. 2002. 'Eliminating Labels', in S. D. Epstein and T. D. Seely (eds.), Explanation and Derivation in the Minimalist Program, Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 64–42.Google Scholar
  23. Collins, Chris, and Höskuldur Thráinsson. 1996. 'VP-internal Structure and Object Shift in Icelandic', Linguistic Inquiry 27, 391–444.Google Scholar
  24. Frampton, John and Sam Gutmann. 2000. Agreement as Feature Sharing, ms., Northeastern University.Google Scholar
  25. Fukui, Naoki. 1986. A Theory of Category Projection and Its Application, Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
  26. Fukui, Naoki. 1995. 'The Principles-and-parameters Approach: A Comparative Syntax of English and Japanese', in M. Shibatani et al. (eds.), Approaches to Language Typology, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 327–372.Google Scholar
  27. Fukui, Naoki. 1997. 'Attract and the A-over-A Principle', in UCI Working Papers in Linguistics 3, Department of Linguistics, University of California, Irvine, pp. 51–67.Google Scholar
  28. Harada, Shin-Ichi. 1976. 'Honorifics', in M. Shibatani (ed.), Syntax and Semantics 5, Academic Press, New York, pp. 499–561.Google Scholar
  29. Hasegawa, Nobuko. 2002. Honorifics, ms., Kanda University.Google Scholar
  30. Hiraiwa, Ken. 2001. 'Multiple Agree and the Defective Intervention Constraint in Japanese', in Proceedings of HUMIT 2000, MITWPL, Cambridge, MA, pp. 67–80.Google Scholar
  31. Hoji, Hajime. 1985. Logical Form Constraints and Configurational Structures in Japanese, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Washington.Google Scholar
  32. Hoshi, Koji. 1996. 'Multiple Case-checking in the Head-internal Relativization in Japanese', in MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 29, MITWPL, Cambridge, MA, pp. 21–40.Google Scholar
  33. Johnson, Kyle. 1991. 'Object Positions', Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 9, 577–636.Google Scholar
  34. Johnson, Kyle. 1994. Bridging the Gap, ms., University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Google Scholar
  35. Kayne, Richard. 1975. French Syntax, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  36. Kayne, Richard. 1989. 'Facets of Past Participle Agreement in Romance', in P. Beninca (ed.), Dialect Variation and the Theory of Grammar, Foris, Dordrecht, pp. 85–103.Google Scholar
  37. Kayne, Richard. 2000. Parameters and Universals, Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  38. Kayne, Richard. 2001. Prepositions as Probes, ms., New York University.Google Scholar
  39. Kitahara, Hisatsugu. 2002. 'A Derivational Analysis of Scrambling Sites', in S. D. Epstein and T. D. Seely (eds.), Derivation and Explanation in the Minimalist Program, Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 167–183.Google Scholar
  40. Koizumi, Masatoshi. 1993. 'Object Agreement Phrases and the Split VP Hypothesis', in MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 18, MITWPL, Cambridge, MA, pp. 99–148.Google Scholar
  41. Koizumi, Masatoshi. 1994. 'Secondary Predicates', Journal of East Asian Linguistics 3, 25–79.Google Scholar
  42. Koizumi, Masatoshi. 1995. Phrase Structure in Minimalist Syntax, Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
  43. Kuroda, S.-Y. 1992. Japanese Syntax and Semantics, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  44. Larson, Richard. 1988. 'On the Double Object Construction', Linguistic Inquiry 19, 335–391.Google Scholar
  45. Lasnik, Howard. 1995. 'A Note on Pseudogapping', in MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 27, MITWPL, Cambridge, MA, pp. 143–163.Google Scholar
  46. Lopez, Luis. 2002. 'On Agreement: Locality and Feature-valuation', in A. Alexiadou (ed.), Formal Approaches to Universals, John Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp. 165–209.Google Scholar
  47. Manzini, M. Rita, and Leonardo M. Savoia. 2001. Clitics: Coocurrence and Mutual Exclusion Patterns, ms., University of Florence.Google Scholar
  48. Martin, Roger. 1999. 'Case and EPP', in S. D. Epstein and N. Hornstein (eds.), Working Minimalism, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 1–25.Google Scholar
  49. Miyagawa, Shigeru. 1997. 'Against Optional Scrambling', Linguistic Inquiry 28, 1–25.Google Scholar
  50. Murasugi, Keiko. 1995. Head-internal Relative Clauses and the Pro-drop Parameter, ms., Kinjo Gakuin University.Google Scholar
  51. Nemoto, Naoko. 1993. Chains and Case Positions: A Study from Scrambling in Japanese, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Connecticut.Google Scholar
  52. Niinuma, Fumikazu. 1999. 'On Nominative Objects and Overt A-movement in Jananese', in R. Daly and A. Riehl (eds.), ESCOL '99, Cornell University, pp. 149–160.Google Scholar
  53. Niinuma, Fumikazu. 2000. On the Role of Postposition in Japanese, ms., University of Connecticut.Google Scholar
  54. Perlmutter, David. 1971. Deep and Surface Constraints in Generative Grammar, Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, New York.Google Scholar
  55. Pylkkänen, Lina. 2002. Introducing Arguments, Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
  56. Richards, Norvin. 1997. What Moves Where When in Which Language?, Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
  57. Shibatani, Masayoshi. 1977. 'Grammatical Relations and Surface Cases', Language 53, 780–809.Google Scholar
  58. Takahashi, Daiko. 1994. Minimality of Movement, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Connecticut.Google Scholar
  59. Takano, Yuji. 1997. Linear Order and Parametric Variation in Syntax, ms., Keio University.Google Scholar
  60. Takano, Yuji. 1998. 'Object Shift and Scrambling', Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 16, 817–889.Google Scholar
  61. Toribio, Almeida. 1990. 'Specifier-head Agreement in Japanese', in Proceedings of WCCFL 9, CSLI, Stanford, pp. 535–548.Google Scholar
  62. Ura, Hiroyuki. 1996. Multiple-feature Checking: A Theory of Grammatical Function Splitting, Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
  63. Ura, Hiroyuki. 1999. 'Dative Subjects in Japanese and Korean', Journal of East Asian Linguistics 7, 223–254.Google Scholar
  64. Ura, Hiroyuki. 2000. Checking Theory and Grammatical Functions in Generative Grammar, Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  65. Woolford, Ellen. 1999. 'More on the Anaphor-agreement Effect', Linguistic Inquiry 30, 257–287.Google Scholar
  66. Yatsushiro, Kazuko. 1999. Case Licensing and VP Structure, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Connecticut.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Cedric Boeckx
    • 1
  • Fumikazu Niinuma
    • 2
  1. 1.Dept. of LinguisticsHarvard UniversityCambridgeUSA
  2. 2.Kochi Gakuen CollegeKochi, KochiJapan

Personalised recommendations