Skip to main content
Log in

A Case of DO-Support in Romance

  • Published:
Natural Language & Linguistic Theory Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper we document the existence in a Romance languageof a strategy of do (fa) insertion in main non-subject interrogatives parallel to the well-known English case. As our description illustrates, the set of contexts wheredo-support applies in this language is a proper subset of the English contexts. The syntax of fa-support in a language with typicalRomance features allows us to draw some general conclusions regarding the analysis of Englishdo-support and the interfaces between syntax and morphology, on one side, andsyntax and lexical-semantic structure, on the other. First, we will show how fa-support in this Romancelanguage constitutes evidence in favor of the hypothesis that V to C movement applies alsoin Romance main questions. Second, some aspects of Rizzi's (1991) proposal that subject wh-sentences have a CP structure with the wh- in SpecC is confirmed by thepresence of an overt complementizer in the language we are dealing with.Thirdly, the phenomenon of Romance fa-support will lead us to further develop Pollock'sidea that do-insertion is directly connected with the theta-grid of a verb: a main verbcannot move to a thematically opaque position, while auxiliaries can, as they do not havea theta-grid. In the Romance dialect we analyze some verbs move to C° (or usedo-support) independently of their use as auxiliaries or as main verbs. In order to accountfor this aspect of the phenomenon, we suggest a more detailed description of the process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Belletti, Adriana. 1988. 'The Case of Unaccusatives', Linguistic Inquiry 19, 1–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belletti, Adriana. 1990. Generalized Ver Movement, Rosenberg and Sellier, Turin.

  • Belletti, Adriana. 1994. 'Verb Positions: Evidence from Italian', in D. Lightfoot and N. Hornstein (eds.), Verb Movement, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 19–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benincà, Paola. 1984. 'Un'ipotesi sulla sintassi delle lingue romanze medievali', Quaderni Patavini di Linguistica 4, 3–19. [Reprinted in Benincà 1994.]

    Google Scholar 

  • Benincà, Paola. 1985/6. 'L'interferenza sintattica: di un aspetto della sintassi ladina considerato di origine tedesca', Quaderni Patavini di Linguistica 5, 3–15. [Reprinted in Benincà 1994.]

    Google Scholar 

  • Benincà, Paola. 1986. 'Punti di sintassi comparata dei dialetti italiani settentrionali', in G. Holtus and K. Ringger (eds.), Raetia antiqua et moderna, W. Th. Elwert zum 80. Geburtstag. Niemeyer, Tübingen, pp. 457–479. [Reprinted in Benincà 1994.]

    Google Scholar 

  • Benincà, Paola. 1988. 'L'ordine degli elementi della frase e le costruzioni marcate', in L. Renzi (ed.), Grande Grammatica Italiana di Consultazione, Il Mulino, Bologna, pp. 115–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benincà, Paola. 1994. La variazione sintattica, Il Mulino, Bologna.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benincà, Paola. 1995. 'Complement Clitics in Medieval Romance: The Tobler-Mussafia Law', in A. Battye and I. Roberts (eds.), Clause Structure and Language Change, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 296–325.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benincà, Paola. 1997. 'Gli elementi interrogativi nel dialetto di Monno', Quaderni di lavoro dell'ASIS 1, 13–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benincà Paola. 1999. 'Between Morphology and Syntax. On the Verbal Morphology of Some Alpine Dialects', in L. Mereu (ed.), Boundaries of Morphology and Syntax, John Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp. 11–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benincà, Paola and Cecilia Poletto. 2002. 'On Some Descriptive Generalizations in Romance', in G. Cinque and R. Kayne, A Handbook of Comparative Syntax, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benincà, Paola and Laura Vanelli. 1982. 'Appunti di sintassi veneta', in M. Cortelazzo (ed.), Guida ai dialetti veneti, Vol. IV, CLEUP, Padova, pp. 7–38 [Reprinted in Benincà 1994.]

    Google Scholar 

  • Burzio, Luigi. 1986. Italian Syntax: A Government & Binding Approach, Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calabrese, Andrea. 2003. 'On Fission and Impoverishment in the Verbal Morphology of the Dialect of Livinal Longo', in C. Tortora (ed.), The Syntax of Italian Dialects, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 3–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cardinaletti, Anna and Giuliana Giusti. 2001. '“Semi-Lexical” Motion Verbs in Romance and Germanic', in N. Corver and H. van Riemsdijk (eds.), Semi-Lexical Categories. On the Function of Content Words and the Content of Function Words, Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin, pp. 371–414.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, Noam. 1955. The Logical Structure of Linguistic Theory, manuscript, Harvard University and MIT. [Partly published in 1975, Plenum, New York.]

  • Chomsky, Noam. 1981. Lectures on Government and Binding, Foris, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, Noam. 1995. The Minimalist Program, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, Noam. 2000. Minimalist Inquiries: The Framework, manuscript, MIT.

  • Cinque, Guglielmo. 1990. Types of A-Bar Dependencies, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cinque, Guglielmo. 1999. Adverbs and Functional Heads, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cinque, Guglielmo. 2001. “Restructuring” and Functional Structure, manuscript, University of Venice.

  • De Crousaz, Isabelle and Ur Shlonsky. 2002. Optional Subject Clitics, pro Licensing and Null Topics, manuscript, University of Geneva.

  • Frank, Robert. 2002. Phrase Structure Composition and Syntactic Dependencies, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedemann, Marc-Ariel. 1995. Sujets syntaxiques: positions, inversion et pro, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Geneva.

  • Grimshaw, Jane. 1997. 'Projection, Heads and Optimality', Linguistic Inquiry 28, 373–422.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hulk, Aafke. 1993. 'Residual Verb-Second and the Licensing of Functional Features', Probus 5, 127–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kayne, Richard S. 1984. Connectedness and Binary Branching, Foris, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kayne, Richard S. 1989. 'Notes on English Agreement', Central Institute of English and Foreign Languages Bulletin (Hyderabad, India) 1, 41–67. [Reprinted in Kayne 2000.]

    Google Scholar 

  • Kayne, Richard S. 1991. 'Romance Clitics, Verb Movement, and PRO', Linguistic Inquiry 22, 647–686.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kayne, Richard S. 1994. The Antisymmetry of Syntax, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kayne, Richard S. 2000. Parameters and Universals, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laka, Itziar. 1990. Negation in Syntax: On the Nature of Functional Categories and Projections, Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.

  • Larson, Richard. 1988. 'On the Double Object Construction', Linguistic Inquiry 19, 335–391.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lightfoot, David. 1979. Principles of Diachronic Syntax, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lightfoot, David. 1991. How to Set Parameters: Arguments from Language Change, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lurá, Franco. 1987. Il dialetto del Mendrisiotto, Mendrisio-Chiasso: Edizioni Unione delle Banche Svizzere.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, Philip H. 1997. 'Auxiliary Verbs in Old and Middle French: A Diachronic Study of Substitute faire and a Comparison with the Modern English Auxiliaries', in A. van Kemenade and N. Vincent (eds.), Parameters of Morphosyntactic Change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 119–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munaro, Nicola. 1995. 'On Nominal wh-Phrases in Some Northern Italian Dialects', Rivista di Grammatica Generativa 20, 69–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munaro, Nicola. 1997. 'Proprietà strutturali e distribuzionali dei sintagmi interrogativi in alcuni dialetti italiani settentrionali', Ph.D. dissertation, University of Padua.

  • Munaro, Nicola. 1999. Sintagmi interrogativi nei dialetti italiani settentrionali, Unipress, Padua.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munaro, Nicola. 2002a. 'Computational Puzzles of Conditional Clause Preposing', in A. M. Di Sciullo (ed.), Proceedings of the 'Language, Brain and Computation' Conference, Venice, 3–5 October 2002.

  • Munaro, Nicola. 2002b. 'The Microvariation of Counterfactuality: On the Role of Morpho-Syntax in Clausal Typing', talk delivered at the XXV GLOW Colloquium, Amsterdam, 9–11 April 2002.

  • Munaro, Nicola, C. Poletto, and J.-Y. Pollock. 2002. 'Eppur si muove: On Comparing French and Bellunese Wh-Movement', in P. Pica and J. Roorick (eds), Yearbook of Comparative Syntax.

  • Pollock, Jean-Yves. 1989. 'Verb Movement, Universal Grammar and the Structure of IP', Linguistic Inquiry 20, 365–424.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poletto, Cecilia. 1993. 'Subject Clitic-Verb Inversion in North-Eastern Italian Dialects', in A. Belletti (ed.), Syntactic Theory and the Dialects of Italy, Rosenberg and Sellier, Turin, pp. 204–251.

  • Poletto, Cecilia. 2000. The Higher Functional Field: Evidence from Northern Italian Dialects, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poletto, Cecilia and Jean-Yves Pollock. 2002. 'On the Left Periphery of Romance Interrogatives: Wh-Clitics, Wh-Doubling and Apparent Wh in situ', talk delivered at the GLOW conference, Amsterdam, April 2002.

  • Rizzi, Luigi. 1982. Issues in Italian Syntax, Foris, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rizzi, Luigi. 1986. 'On the Status of Subject Clitics in Romance', in O. Jaeggli and C. Silva-Corvalàn (eds.), Studies in Romance Linguistics, Foris, Dordrecht, pp. 137–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rizzi, Luigi. 1991. 'Residual Verb Second and the wh-Criterion', Geneva Generative Papers No. 2.

  • Rizzi, Luigi. 1997. 'The Fine Structure of the Left Periphery', in L. Haegeman (ed.), Elements of Grammar, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp. 281–337.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rizzi, Luigi and Ian Roberts. 1989. 'Complex Inversion in French', Probus 1, 1–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, Ian. 1985. 'Agreement Parameters and the Development of English Modal Auxiliaries', Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 3, 21–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, Ian. 1993. Verbs and Diachronic Syntax: A Comparative History of English and French, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, Ian and Anna Roussou. 1999. Syntactic Change: A Minimalist Approach to Grammaticalisation, manuscript, Universities of Cambridge and Patras.

  • Sportiche, Dominique. 1995. 'Clitic Constructions', in L. A. Zaring and J. Roorick (eds.), Phrase Structure and the Lexicon, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp. 213–276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tortora, Christina. 1997. The Syntax and Semantics of the Locative Expletive, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Delaware.

  • Tortora, Christina. 2000. 'Agreement, Case, and I-Subjects', Proceedings of the 29th Meeting of the Northeaster Linguistics Society.

  • Tortora, Christina. 2002. 'Romance Enclisis, Prepositions, and Aspect', Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 20, 725–758.

    Google Scholar 

  • Viel, Valeria. 2001. The Grammar of Relative Clauses in Old and Middle English, Laurea Thesis, University of Padua.

  • Vikner, Sten. 1995. Verb Movement and Expletive Subjects in the Germanic Languages, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vikner, Sten. 2001. 'V°-to-I° Movement and do-Insertion in Optimality Theory', in G. Legendre, J. Grimshaw, and S. Vikner (eds.), Optimality-Theoretic Syntax, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 427–464.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warner, Anthony. 1997. 'The Structure of Parametric Change and V-Movement in the History of English', in A. van Kemenade and N. Vincent (eds.), Parameters of Morphosyntactic Change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 380–394.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zanuttini, Raffaella. 1997. Negation and Clausal Structure: A Comparative Study of Romance Languages, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Benincá, P., Poletto, C. A Case of DO-Support in Romance. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 22, 51–94 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:NALA.0000005565.12630.c1

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:NALA.0000005565.12630.c1

Keywords

Navigation