Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

On Headed, Headless, and Light-Headed Relatives

  • Published:
Natural Language & Linguistic Theory Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper re-examines a syntactic typology of relative clauses in the light of new data from Polish. While the distinction between headed and headless relatives seems to be syntactically well motivated, Polish (and possibly other languages as well) allow relatives that cannot easily be assimilated to either of these two types. Such relatives, which I will refer to as light-headed relatives, are the topic of this paper. They are headed by morphologically `light elements', and tend to differ from their headed counterparts with respect to relative pronoun or relative complementizer selection.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Aügero-Bautista, Calixto. 2000. 'Universal NPs in Relative Clauses', in R. Billerey and B. D. Lillehaugen (eds.), Proceedings of the Nineteenth West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, Cascadilla Press, Somerville, MA, pp. 15–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailyn, John, and Barbara Citko. 1999. 'Case and Agreement in Slavic Predicates', in K. Dziwirek, H. Coats, and C. M. Vakareliyska (eds.), Annual Workshop on Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics: The Seattle Meeting, 1998, Michigan Slavic Publications, Ann Arbor, pp. 17–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bianchi, Valentina. 1999. Consequences of Antisymmetry. Headed Relative Clauses, Mouton de Gruyer, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bianchi, Valentina. 2000. 'The Raising Analysis of Relative Clauses; A Reply to Borsley', Linguistic Inquiry 31, 123–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borsley, Robert. 1997. 'Relative Clauses and the Theory of Phrase Structure', Linguistic Inquiry 28, 629–648.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borsley, Robert, and Ewa Jaworska. 1988. 'A Note on Preposition Stranding and Case Marking in Polish', Linguistic Inquiry 19, 685–690.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brame, Michael. 1968. A New Analysis of the Relative Clause: Evidence for an Interpretive Theory, ms., MIT.

  • Bresnan, Joan, and Jane Grimshaw. 1978. 'The Syntax of Free Relatives in English', Linguistic Inquiry 9, 331–391.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broihier, Kevin. 1995. Slavic Relatives, Resumptive Pronouns and Learnability, ms., MIT.

  • Bury, Dirk, and Ad Neeleman. 1999. Projection of Free Relatives, ms., University College London.

  • Carlson, Greg. 1977. 'Amount Relatives', Language 58, 520–542.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, Noam. 1957. Syntactic Structures, Mouton, The Hague.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, Noam. 1995. The Minimalist Program, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corver, Norbert. 1990. The Syntax of Left Branch Extractions, Ph.D. dissertation, Tilburg University.

  • Dayal, Veneeta. 1997. 'Free Relatives and Ever: Identity and Free Choice Readings', in A. Lawson (ed.), Proceedings from Semantics and Linguistic Theory VII, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, pp. 99–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisiak, Jacek, Maria Lipińska-Grzegorek, and Tadeusz Zabrocki. 1978. An Introductory English-Polish Contrastive Grammar, Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe, Warsaw.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giusti, Giuliana. 1997. 'The Categorial Status of Determiners', in L. Haegeman (ed.), The New Comparative Syntax, Addison Wesley Longman, New York, pp. 95–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Groos, Anneke, and Henk van Riemsdijk. 1981. 'The Matching Effects in Free Relatives: a Parameter of Core Grammar', in A. Belletti, L. Brandi, and L. Rizzi (eds.), Theory of Markedness in Generative Grammar, Scuola Normale Superiore, Pisa, pp. 171–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grosu, Alexander. 1994. Three Studies in Locality and Case, Routledge, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grosu, Alexander. 1996. 'On the Proper Analysis of “Missing P” Free Relative Constructions', Linguistic Inquiry 27, 41–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grosu, Alexander, and Fred Landman. 1998. 'Strange Relatives of the Third Kind', Natural Language Semantics 6, 125–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harbert, Wayne. 1982. 'On the Nature of the Matching Parameter', The Linguistic Review 2, 237–284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschbühler, Paul, and Maria-Luisa Rivero. 1983. 'Remarks on Free Relatives and Matching Phenomena', Linguistic Inquiry 14, 505–520.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hornstein, Norbert. 2000. Move! A Minimalist Theory of Construal, Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iatridou, Sabine, Elena Anagnostopoulou, and Roumyana Izvorski. 1999. 'Some Observations about the Form and the Meaning of the Perfect', in M. Kenstowicz (ed.), Ken Hale: A Life in Language, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 189–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iatridou, Sabine, and Spyridoula Varlokosta. 1998. 'Pseudoclefts Crosslinguistically', Natural Language Semantics 6, 3–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson, Pauline. 1995. 'On the Quantification Force of English Free Relatives', in E. Bach, E. Jelinek, A. Kratzer, and B. H. Partee (eds.), Quantification in Natural Languages, Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp. 451–487.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kayne, Richard. 1994. The Antisymmetry of Syntax, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kester, Ellen-Petra. 1996. The Nature of Adjectival Inflection, Ph.D. dissertation, Utrecht Institute of Linguistics, Utrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larson, Richard. 1987. 'Missing Prepositions and the Analysis of English Free Relative Clauses', Linguistic Inquiry 19, 239–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larson, Richard. 1998. 'Free Relative Clauses and Missing P's: Reply to Grosu', ms., Stony Brook University.

  • Lasnik, Howard. 1981. 'Restricting the Theory of Transformations: a Case Study', in N. Hornstein and D. Lightfoot (eds.), Explanation in Linguistics, Longmans, London, pp. 152–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagórko, Alicja. 2001. Zarys Gramatyki Polskiej (ze Slowotwórstem), Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, Warsaw.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nunes, Jairo. 1995. The Copy Theory of Movement and Linearization of Chains in the Minimalist Program, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Maryland at College Park.

  • Nunes, Jairo. 2000. 'Remnant Movement and Phonetic Realization of Traces', Handout of a GLOW talk.

  • Nunes, Jairo. 2001. 'Sideward Movement', Linguistic Inquiry 32, 303–344.

    Google Scholar 

  • Partee, Barbara. 1976. 'Some Transformational Extensions of Montague Grammar', in B. Partee (ed.), Montague Grammar, Academic Press, New York, pp. 51–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pesetsky, David. 1998. 'Some Optimality Principles of Sentence Pronunciation', in P. Barbosa, D. Fox, P. Hagstrom, M. McGinnis, and D. Pesetsky (eds.), Is the Best Good Enough? Optimality and Competition in Syntax, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 337–383.

    Google Scholar 

  • Platzack, Christer. 2000. 'A Complement-of-N0 Account of Restrictive and Non-Restrictive Relatives: The Case of Swedish', in A. Alexiadou, P. Law, A. Meinunger, and C. Wilder (eds.), The Syntax of Relative Clauses, John Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp. 265–309.

    Google Scholar 

  • Safir, Ken. 1999. 'A-bar Reconstruction and Vehicle Change in A-bar Chains', Linguistic Inquiry 30, 587–621.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sauerland, Uli. 1998. The Meaning of Chains, Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.

  • Schachter, Paul. 1973. 'Focus and Relativization', Language 53, 19–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suñer, Margarita. 1984. 'Free Relatives and the Matching Parameter', Linguistic Review 3, 363–387.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Riemsdijk, Henk. 2000. 'Free Relatives: a Syntactic Case Study', Syntax Companion (SynCom), an (Electronic) Encyclopaedia of Syntactic Case Studies, LingComp Foundation.

  • Vergnaud, Jean-Roger. 1974. French Relative Clauses, Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.

  • Williamson, Janis. 1987. 'An Indefiniteness Restriction for Relative Clauses in Lakhota', in E. Reuland and A. ter Meulen (eds), The Representation of (In)definiteness, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 168–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiltschko, Martina. 1998. 'On the Syntax and Semantics of (Relative) Pronouns and Determiners', Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 2, 143–181.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Linguistics Program, Brandeis University, MS – 013, P.O. Box 549110, Waltham, MA, 02454-9110, USA

    Barbara Citko

Authors
  1. Barbara Citko
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Citko, B. On Headed, Headless, and Light-Headed Relatives. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 22, 95–126 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:NALA.0000005564.33961.e0

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:NALA.0000005564.33961.e0

Keywords

Search

Navigation