Skip to main content
Log in

Generalized Inversion

  • Published:
Natural Language & Linguistic Theory Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this article, I generalize the notion of``Inversion'' on the IP-level to include allcases of what has previously been referred toas Inversion (following Collins 1997) andA-Scrambling (following Miyagawa 2000,forthcoming a, b) as well as variousother constructions in which a non-Nominativesubject fills the canonical subject position,SpecIP. I exemplify IP-Inversion using a range ofconstructions from Russian, and show that the``inverted'' constituent has subject (A) properties,and that it is accompanied by verb-raising, which isrequired in such instances by the Overt Tense Condition.The ability to fill SpecIP with a non-Nominativeconstituent is a parameterized property of alanguage related to the strength of the Nominativecase features in I. The driving force behind Inversionis (a version of) the (traditional) Extended ProjectionPrinciple (EPP), that is an overtness requirement onthe specifier of the functional category I. FinallyI argue that Inversion, as an overtness requirementon the specifier of a functional projection, can begeneralized to the CP level as well, where an equivalent overtness requirement forces filling ofSpecCP, as in Germanic V2 languages. The analysisallows us to unite various apparently disparateconstructions as the result of a simple set ofparameters, and to expose central issues of economywithin the computational system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Alexiadou, Artemis and Elena Anagnostopoulou. 1998. 'Parameterizing AGR: Word Order, V-movement and EPP', Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 16, 491–539.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anand, Pranav and Andrew Nevins. 2002. 'In Some Specifier Sites Every Wide Scope Subject', Paper given at LF reading Group, MIT.

  • Babby, Leonard H. 1991. 'Non-Configurational Case Assignment in Russian', in A. J. Toribio and W. Harbert (eds.), Cornell Working Papers in Linguistics 9, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY, pp. 1–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Babby, Leonard H. 1994. 'A Theta-Theoretic Analysis of Adversity Impersonal Sentences in Russian', in S. Avrutin et al. (eds.), FASL 2: The MIT Meeting, Michigan Slavic Publications, Ann Arbor, pp. 25–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Babyonyshev, Maria. 1996. Structural Connections in Syntax and Processing: Studies in Russian and Japanese Grammatical Subject in 1st Language Acquisition, Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.

  • Bailyn, John Frederick. 1992. 'LF Movement of Anaphors and the Acquisition of Embedded Clauses in Russian', Language Acquisition 2, 307–335.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailyn, John Frederick. 1995a. A Configurational Approach to Russian 'Free' Word Order, Ph.D. dissertation, Cornell University.

  • Bailyn, John Frederick. 1995b. 'Underlying Phrase Structure and "short' Verb Movement tn Russian', Journal of Slavic Linguistics 3, 13–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailyn, John Frederick. 2001a. 'On Scrambling: A Reply to Bošsković and Takahashi', Linguistic Inquiry 32, 635–658.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailyn, John Frederick. 2001b. 'The Case of Slavic Predicate Case', in A. Strigin et al. (eds.), ZAS Occasional Papers in Linguistics, Zentrum fur allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft, Berlin, pp. 1–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailyn, John Frederick. 2003. 'A (Purely) Derivational Approach to Russian Free Word Order', in W. Browne et al. (eds.), FASL 11: The Amherst Meeting, Michigan Slavic Publications, Ann Arbor.

    Google Scholar 

  • den Besten, Henk. 1983. 'On the Interaction of Root Transformations and Lexical Deletive Rules', in W. Abraham (ed.), Papers from the 3rd Groningen Grammar Talks, John Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp. 47–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bobaljik, Jonathan and Dianne Jonas. 1996. 'Subject Positions and the Roles of TP', Linguistic Inquiry 27, 195–236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boeckx, Cedric. 2000. 'Quirky Agreement', Studia Linguistica 54, 354–380.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bošković, Željko. 2002. 'A-Movement and the EPP', Syntax 3, 167–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowers, John S. 1993. 'The Syntax of Predication', Linguistic Inquiry 24, 591–656.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, Sue. 1999. The Syntax of Negation in Russian, CSLI Publications, Stanford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, Noam. 1982. Some Concepts and Consequences of the Theory of Government and Binding, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, Noam. 1995. The Minimalist Program, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, Noam. 2000. 'Minimalist Inquiries: The Framework', in R. Martin et al. (eds.), Step by Step: Essays in Honor of Howard Lasnik, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 89–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, Noam. 2001. 'Derivation by Phase', in M. Kenstowicz (ed.), Ken Hale: A Life in Language, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 1–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, Chris. 1997. Local Economy, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, Chris. 2002. 'Passive as Inversion', talk given at MIT Colloquium Series, Cambridge, MA.

  • Diesing, Molly. 1990. 'Verb Movement and the Subject Position in Yiddish', Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 8, 41–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, Samuel David, Erich Groat, Ruriko Kawashima and Hisatsugu Kitahara. 1998. A Derivational Approach to Syntactic Relations, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fanselow, Gisbert. 2001. 'Features, θ-Roles and Free Constituent Order', Linguistic Inquiry 32, 405–438.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franks, Steven. 1995. Parameters of Slavic Morphosyntax, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franks, Steven and Michael Yadroff. 2002. 'The Origin of Prepositions', in U. Junghanns, L. Szucsich and G. Zybatow (eds.), Current Issues in Formal Slavic Linguistics (FDSL 3), Peter Lang, Frankfurt/Main, pp. 69–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grewendorf, Günter and Joachim Sabel. 1998. 'Scrambling in German and Japanese: Adjunction Versus Multiple Specifiers', Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 16, 1–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmberg, Anders and Christer Platzack. 1995. The Role of lnflection in Scandinavian Syntax, Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmberg, Anders. 2000. 'Stylistic Inversion', Linguistic Inquiry 31, 445–483.

    Google Scholar 

  • Junghanns, Uwe and Gerhilde Zybatow. 1997. 'Syntax and Information Structure of Russian Clauses', in E. Wayles Browne et al. (eds.), FASL 4: The Cornell Meeting, Michigan Slavic Publications, Ann Arbor, pp. 289–319.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kawamura, Tomoko. 2001. 'A Feature-Checking Analysis of Japanese Scrambling', MA thesis, Kanzan University.

  • King, Tracy Halloway. 1995. Configuring Topic and Focus in Russian, CSLI Publications, Stanford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitahara, Hisatsugu. 1997. Elementary Operations and Optimal Derivations, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitahara, Hisatsugu. 2002. 'Scrambling, Case, and Interpretability', in S. D. Epstein and T. D. Seely (eds.), Derivation and Explanation in the Minimalist Program, Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 167–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larson, Richard K. 1988. 'On the Double Object Construction', Linguistic Inquiry 19, 335–391.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lasnik, Howard. 2001. 'A note on the EPP', Linguistic Inquiry 32, 356–362.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lavine, James. 1998. 'Null Expletives and the EPP in Slavic: A Minimalist Analysis', in S. Franks et al. (eds.), FASL VI: The Connecticut Meeting, Michigan Slavic Publications, Ann Arbor, pp. 212–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lavine, James. 2000. Topics in the Syntax of Nonagreeing Predicates in Slavic, Ph.D. dissertation, Princeton University.

  • Lavine, James and Robert Freidin. 2001. 'The Subject of Defective Tense in Russian', Journal of Slavic Linguistics 9, 253–290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maling, Joan and Annie Zaenen. 1990. Modern Icelandic Syntax, Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miyagawa, Shigeru. 1997. 'Against Optional Scrambling', Linguistic Inquiry 27, 1–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miyagawa, Shigeru. 2001. 'The EPP, Scrambling and WH-in situ', in M. Kenstowicz (ed.), Ken Hale, A Life in Language, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 293–338.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miyagawa, Shigeru. 2003. 'A-Movement Scrambling and Options without Optionality', in S. Karimi (ed.), Word Order and Scrambling, Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 177–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miyagawa, Shigeru. Forthcoming. 'Some Consequences of the EPP Analysis of Scrambling', in Proceedings of the Word Order Workshop, Bosporous University Press, Istanbul.

  • Moore, John and David Perlmutter. 2000. 'What Does it Take to be a Dative Subject?', Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 18, 373–416.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ndayiragije, Juvénal. 1999. 'Checking Economy', Linguistic Inquiry 30, 399–444.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pesetsky, David and Esther Torrego. 2001. 'T → C: An Account and its Consequences', in M. Kenstowicz (ed.), Ken Hale: A Life in Language, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 355–426.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollock, Jean-Yves. 1989. 'Verb Movement, UG and the Structure of IP', Linguistic Inquiry 20, 365–424.

    Google Scholar 

  • Preslar, Mark. 1998. 'The Subject Position in Russian Impersonal Sentences', Linguistic Analysis 28, 33–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rappaport, Gilbert. 1986. 'On Anaphor Binding in Russian', Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 4, 97–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinhart, Tanya. 1983. Anaphora and Semantic Interpretation, Croom Helm, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Restan, Per. 1981. 'The Position of the Finite Verb in Some Elementary Declarative Sentences in Modern Russian', in The Slavic Verb: An Anthology Presented to Hans Christian Sørenson, Rosenkilde & Bagger, Copenhagen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reuland, Eric (ed.). 2000. Arguments and Case: Explaining Burzio's Generalization, John Benjamins, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, Ian. 1993. Verbs and Diachronic Syntax, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saito, Mamoru. 1992. 'Long Distance Scrambling in Japanese', Journal of East Asian Linguistics 1, 69–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoorlemmer, Maaike. 1995. Participial Passive and Aspect in Russian, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Utrecht.

  • Sigurdhsson, Halldór Armann. 2002. 'To be an Oblique Subject: Russian vs. Icelandic', Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 20, 691–724.

    Google Scholar 

  • Svenonius, Peter (ed.). 2002. Subjects, Expletives and the EPP, John Benjamins, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Takano, Yuji. 1998. 'Object Shift and Scrambling', Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 16, 817–888.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thráinsson, Höskuldur. 1996. 'On the Non-universality of Functional Categories', in W. Abraham et al. (eds.), Minimal Ideas, Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 253–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webelhuth, G. 1989. Syntactic Saturation Phenomena and the Modern Germanic Languages, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.

  • Yadroff, Michael. 1999. Formal Properties of Functional Categories: The Minimalist Syntax of Russian Nominal and Prepositional Expressions, Ph.D. dissertation, Indiana University.

  • Zubizarreta, Maria-Luisa. 1998. Focus, Prosody, and Word Order, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bailyn, J.F. Generalized Inversion. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 22, 1–50 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:NALA.0000005556.40898.a5

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:NALA.0000005556.40898.a5

Keywords

Navigation