Abstract
In this article, I generalize the notion of``Inversion'' on the IP-level to include allcases of what has previously been referred toas Inversion (following Collins 1997) andA-Scrambling (following Miyagawa 2000,forthcoming a, b) as well as variousother constructions in which a non-Nominativesubject fills the canonical subject position,SpecIP. I exemplify IP-Inversion using a range ofconstructions from Russian, and show that the``inverted'' constituent has subject (A) properties,and that it is accompanied by verb-raising, which isrequired in such instances by the Overt Tense Condition.The ability to fill SpecIP with a non-Nominativeconstituent is a parameterized property of alanguage related to the strength of the Nominativecase features in I. The driving force behind Inversionis (a version of) the (traditional) Extended ProjectionPrinciple (EPP), that is an overtness requirement onthe specifier of the functional category I. FinallyI argue that Inversion, as an overtness requirementon the specifier of a functional projection, can begeneralized to the CP level as well, where an equivalent overtness requirement forces filling ofSpecCP, as in Germanic V2 languages. The analysisallows us to unite various apparently disparateconstructions as the result of a simple set ofparameters, and to expose central issues of economywithin the computational system.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Alexiadou, Artemis and Elena Anagnostopoulou. 1998. 'Parameterizing AGR: Word Order, V-movement and EPP', Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 16, 491–539.
Anand, Pranav and Andrew Nevins. 2002. 'In Some Specifier Sites Every Wide Scope Subject', Paper given at LF reading Group, MIT.
Babby, Leonard H. 1991. 'Non-Configurational Case Assignment in Russian', in A. J. Toribio and W. Harbert (eds.), Cornell Working Papers in Linguistics 9, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY, pp. 1–55.
Babby, Leonard H. 1994. 'A Theta-Theoretic Analysis of Adversity Impersonal Sentences in Russian', in S. Avrutin et al. (eds.), FASL 2: The MIT Meeting, Michigan Slavic Publications, Ann Arbor, pp. 25–67.
Babyonyshev, Maria. 1996. Structural Connections in Syntax and Processing: Studies in Russian and Japanese Grammatical Subject in 1st Language Acquisition, Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.
Bailyn, John Frederick. 1992. 'LF Movement of Anaphors and the Acquisition of Embedded Clauses in Russian', Language Acquisition 2, 307–335.
Bailyn, John Frederick. 1995a. A Configurational Approach to Russian 'Free' Word Order, Ph.D. dissertation, Cornell University.
Bailyn, John Frederick. 1995b. 'Underlying Phrase Structure and "short' Verb Movement tn Russian', Journal of Slavic Linguistics 3, 13–58.
Bailyn, John Frederick. 2001a. 'On Scrambling: A Reply to Bošsković and Takahashi', Linguistic Inquiry 32, 635–658.
Bailyn, John Frederick. 2001b. 'The Case of Slavic Predicate Case', in A. Strigin et al. (eds.), ZAS Occasional Papers in Linguistics, Zentrum fur allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft, Berlin, pp. 1–26.
Bailyn, John Frederick. 2003. 'A (Purely) Derivational Approach to Russian Free Word Order', in W. Browne et al. (eds.), FASL 11: The Amherst Meeting, Michigan Slavic Publications, Ann Arbor.
den Besten, Henk. 1983. 'On the Interaction of Root Transformations and Lexical Deletive Rules', in W. Abraham (ed.), Papers from the 3rd Groningen Grammar Talks, John Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp. 47–131.
Bobaljik, Jonathan and Dianne Jonas. 1996. 'Subject Positions and the Roles of TP', Linguistic Inquiry 27, 195–236.
Boeckx, Cedric. 2000. 'Quirky Agreement', Studia Linguistica 54, 354–380.
Bošković, Željko. 2002. 'A-Movement and the EPP', Syntax 3, 167–218.
Bowers, John S. 1993. 'The Syntax of Predication', Linguistic Inquiry 24, 591–656.
Brown, Sue. 1999. The Syntax of Negation in Russian, CSLI Publications, Stanford.
Chomsky, Noam. 1982. Some Concepts and Consequences of the Theory of Government and Binding, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Chomsky, Noam. 1995. The Minimalist Program, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Chomsky, Noam. 2000. 'Minimalist Inquiries: The Framework', in R. Martin et al. (eds.), Step by Step: Essays in Honor of Howard Lasnik, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 89–155.
Chomsky, Noam. 2001. 'Derivation by Phase', in M. Kenstowicz (ed.), Ken Hale: A Life in Language, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 1–52.
Collins, Chris. 1997. Local Economy, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Collins, Chris. 2002. 'Passive as Inversion', talk given at MIT Colloquium Series, Cambridge, MA.
Diesing, Molly. 1990. 'Verb Movement and the Subject Position in Yiddish', Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 8, 41–79.
Epstein, Samuel David, Erich Groat, Ruriko Kawashima and Hisatsugu Kitahara. 1998. A Derivational Approach to Syntactic Relations, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Fanselow, Gisbert. 2001. 'Features, θ-Roles and Free Constituent Order', Linguistic Inquiry 32, 405–438.
Franks, Steven. 1995. Parameters of Slavic Morphosyntax, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Franks, Steven and Michael Yadroff. 2002. 'The Origin of Prepositions', in U. Junghanns, L. Szucsich and G. Zybatow (eds.), Current Issues in Formal Slavic Linguistics (FDSL 3), Peter Lang, Frankfurt/Main, pp. 69–79.
Grewendorf, Günter and Joachim Sabel. 1998. 'Scrambling in German and Japanese: Adjunction Versus Multiple Specifiers', Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 16, 1–65.
Holmberg, Anders and Christer Platzack. 1995. The Role of lnflection in Scandinavian Syntax, Oxford University Press, New York.
Holmberg, Anders. 2000. 'Stylistic Inversion', Linguistic Inquiry 31, 445–483.
Junghanns, Uwe and Gerhilde Zybatow. 1997. 'Syntax and Information Structure of Russian Clauses', in E. Wayles Browne et al. (eds.), FASL 4: The Cornell Meeting, Michigan Slavic Publications, Ann Arbor, pp. 289–319.
Kawamura, Tomoko. 2001. 'A Feature-Checking Analysis of Japanese Scrambling', MA thesis, Kanzan University.
King, Tracy Halloway. 1995. Configuring Topic and Focus in Russian, CSLI Publications, Stanford.
Kitahara, Hisatsugu. 1997. Elementary Operations and Optimal Derivations, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Kitahara, Hisatsugu. 2002. 'Scrambling, Case, and Interpretability', in S. D. Epstein and T. D. Seely (eds.), Derivation and Explanation in the Minimalist Program, Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 167–183.
Larson, Richard K. 1988. 'On the Double Object Construction', Linguistic Inquiry 19, 335–391.
Lasnik, Howard. 2001. 'A note on the EPP', Linguistic Inquiry 32, 356–362.
Lavine, James. 1998. 'Null Expletives and the EPP in Slavic: A Minimalist Analysis', in S. Franks et al. (eds.), FASL VI: The Connecticut Meeting, Michigan Slavic Publications, Ann Arbor, pp. 212–230.
Lavine, James. 2000. Topics in the Syntax of Nonagreeing Predicates in Slavic, Ph.D. dissertation, Princeton University.
Lavine, James and Robert Freidin. 2001. 'The Subject of Defective Tense in Russian', Journal of Slavic Linguistics 9, 253–290.
Maling, Joan and Annie Zaenen. 1990. Modern Icelandic Syntax, Academic Press, New York.
Miyagawa, Shigeru. 1997. 'Against Optional Scrambling', Linguistic Inquiry 27, 1–26.
Miyagawa, Shigeru. 2001. 'The EPP, Scrambling and WH-in situ', in M. Kenstowicz (ed.), Ken Hale, A Life in Language, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 293–338.
Miyagawa, Shigeru. 2003. 'A-Movement Scrambling and Options without Optionality', in S. Karimi (ed.), Word Order and Scrambling, Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 177–200.
Miyagawa, Shigeru. Forthcoming. 'Some Consequences of the EPP Analysis of Scrambling', in Proceedings of the Word Order Workshop, Bosporous University Press, Istanbul.
Moore, John and David Perlmutter. 2000. 'What Does it Take to be a Dative Subject?', Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 18, 373–416.
Ndayiragije, Juvénal. 1999. 'Checking Economy', Linguistic Inquiry 30, 399–444.
Pesetsky, David and Esther Torrego. 2001. 'T → C: An Account and its Consequences', in M. Kenstowicz (ed.), Ken Hale: A Life in Language, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 355–426.
Pollock, Jean-Yves. 1989. 'Verb Movement, UG and the Structure of IP', Linguistic Inquiry 20, 365–424.
Preslar, Mark. 1998. 'The Subject Position in Russian Impersonal Sentences', Linguistic Analysis 28, 33–66.
Rappaport, Gilbert. 1986. 'On Anaphor Binding in Russian', Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 4, 97–120.
Reinhart, Tanya. 1983. Anaphora and Semantic Interpretation, Croom Helm, London.
Restan, Per. 1981. 'The Position of the Finite Verb in Some Elementary Declarative Sentences in Modern Russian', in The Slavic Verb: An Anthology Presented to Hans Christian Sørenson, Rosenkilde & Bagger, Copenhagen.
Reuland, Eric (ed.). 2000. Arguments and Case: Explaining Burzio's Generalization, John Benjamins, Amsterdam.
Roberts, Ian. 1993. Verbs and Diachronic Syntax, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.
Saito, Mamoru. 1992. 'Long Distance Scrambling in Japanese', Journal of East Asian Linguistics 1, 69–118.
Schoorlemmer, Maaike. 1995. Participial Passive and Aspect in Russian, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Utrecht.
Sigurdhsson, Halldór Armann. 2002. 'To be an Oblique Subject: Russian vs. Icelandic', Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 20, 691–724.
Svenonius, Peter (ed.). 2002. Subjects, Expletives and the EPP, John Benjamins, Amsterdam.
Takano, Yuji. 1998. 'Object Shift and Scrambling', Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 16, 817–888.
Thráinsson, Höskuldur. 1996. 'On the Non-universality of Functional Categories', in W. Abraham et al. (eds.), Minimal Ideas, Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 253–281.
Webelhuth, G. 1989. Syntactic Saturation Phenomena and the Modern Germanic Languages, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.
Yadroff, Michael. 1999. Formal Properties of Functional Categories: The Minimalist Syntax of Russian Nominal and Prepositional Expressions, Ph.D. dissertation, Indiana University.
Zubizarreta, Maria-Luisa. 1998. Focus, Prosody, and Word Order, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bailyn, J.F. Generalized Inversion. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 22, 1–50 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:NALA.0000005556.40898.a5
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:NALA.0000005556.40898.a5