Skip to main content
Log in

Method for a Fast and Simple Dynamic Analysis of 2D and 3D Mechanisms

  • Published:
Multibody System Dynamics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Here, an approach to describe the dynamics of 2D and 3D mechanisms that leads to a simpleand fast analysis is presented. Any position of an elastic mechanism may be defined usingonly rotations. Because in space the finite angles are not vectors, the Euler–Rodriguesparameters were adopted to describe the 3D rotations. The assembling process of the links intothe whole mechanism is natural and follows the standard finite element scheme. Lagrange multipliersare used only to impose the closed loop conditions. The approach developed in this work can be applied to 3D mechanisms composed by beams and having internal hinges as kinematics pairs, but itcan be generalized to other link shapes. The method is used either for mechanisms with rigid links,or with elastic ones, even for very deformable links that completely change the initial configuration.Both the floating and the absolute reference frame approach may be used, depending on the problem;passing from one formulation to the other is quite natural.

If the links may be considered beams, the method starts from the exact equations written forthe deformed shape of each link and this provides a good accuracy. In this paper, a special finiteelement is presented: the unknowns of the problems being the nodal rotations or nodal Euler–Rodriguesparameters. Few nodes are requested for good accuracy. In general, as the number degrees of freedomper node is smaller than in the classical finite element approach, an important reducing of the totalnumber of nodal unknowns is obtained leading to an important reducing of the computer time. TheEuler–Bernoulli beam model was adopted, but the implementation of the Timoshenko beam model thattakes the shear efforts into account, is not difficult.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Azouz, N., Pascal, M. and Combescure, A., ‘Application de la MEF à la modélisation dynamique des robots souples’, Revue Européenne des Eléments Finis 7, 1999, 763–791.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Banerjee, A.K. and Nagarajan, S., ‘Efficient simulation of large overall motion of beams undergoing large deflection’, Multibody System Dynamics 1, 1997, 113–126.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Barraco, A., Dynamique des systèmes mécaniques complexes, ENSAM, Centre d'Enseignement et de Recherche de Paris, 1996.

  4. Barraco, A. and Munteanu, Gh.M., ‘A special finite element for static and dynamic study of mechanical systems under large motion’, Revue Européenne des Elements Finis 11(6), 2002, 773–790.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bathe, K.-J., Finite Element Procedures in Engineering Analysis, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Berzeri, M., Campanelli, M. and Shabana, A.A., ‘Definition of the elastic forces in the finite-element absolute nodal coordinate formulation and the floating frame of reference formulation’, Multibody System Dynamics 5, 2001, 21–54.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bouzgarrou, B.C., Thuilot, B., Ray, P. and Gogu, Gr., ‘Modélisation et commande d'une machine UTGV à cinématique parallèle’, in XVème Congrès Français de Mécanique, 2001, 1–6 (CD-Rom).

  8. Bouzgarrou, B.C., Thuilot, B., Ray, P. and Gogu, Gr., ‘Modélisation de manipulateurs flexibles appliquée aux machines-outils UTGV’, Mécanique & Industries 3, 2002, 173–180.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Boyer, F. and Coiffet, Ph., ‘Generalization of Newton-Euler model for flexible manipulators’, Journal of Robotic Systems 13, 1996, 11–24.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Boyer, F. and Khalil, W., ‘An efficient calculation of flexible manipulator inverse dynamics’, The International Journal of Robotics Research 17, 1998, 282–293.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Cuadrano., J., Cardenal, J. and Bayo, E., ‘Modelling and solution methods for efficient real-time simulation of multibody dynamics’, Multibody System Dynamics 1, 1997, 259–280.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Escalona, J.L., Hussien, H.A. and Shabana, A.A., ‘Application of the absolute nodal coordinate formulation to multibody system dynamics’, Journal of Sound and Vibration 214, 1998, 833–851.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Langlois, R.G. and Anderson, R.J., ‘Multibody dynamics of very flexible damped systems’, Multibody System Dynamics 3, 1999, 109–136.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Munteanu, M.G., De Bona, F. and Zelenika, S, ‘An accurate non-linear analysis of very large displacements of beam systems’, in Proceedings of the XXV AIAS National Conference, International Conference on Material Engineering, Gallipoli, Italy, 1996, 59–66.

  15. Pascal, M., ‘Some open problems in dynamic analysis of flexible multibody systems, Multibody System Dynamics 5, 2001, 315–334.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Shabana, A.A., Dynamics of Multibody Systems, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Shabana, A.A., ‘Flexible multibody dynamics: Review of past and recent developments’, Multibody System Dynamics 1, 1997, 189–222.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Shabana, A.A., ‘Definition of the slopes and the finite element absolute nodal coordinate formulation’, Multibody System Dynamics 1, 1997, 339–348.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Sandor, G.N. and Erdman, A.G., Advanced Mechanism Design, Vol. II, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Torby, B.J. and Kimura, I., ‘Dynamic modeling of a flexible manipulator with prismatic links’, Journal of Dynamic System, Measurement, and Control 121, 1999, 691–696.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Schiehlen, W., ‘Multibody system dynamics: Roots and perspectives’, Multibody System Dynamics 1, 1997, 149–188.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Schwab, A.L. and Meijaard, J.P., ‘Small vibrations superimposed on a prescribed rigid body motion’, Multibody System Dynamics 8, 2002, 29–49.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Simo, J.C. and Vu-Quoc, L., ‘On the dynamics in space of rods undergoing large motions — A geometrical exact approach’, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 66, 1988, 125–161.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Shi, P., McPhee, J. and Heppler, G.R., ‘A deformation field for Euler—Bernoulli beams with applications to flexible multibody dynamics’, Multibody System Dynamics 5, 2001, 79–104.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Wang, J. and Gosselin, C.M., ‘A new approach for the dynamic analysis of parallel manipulators’, Multibody System Dynamics 2, 1998, 317–334.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Wang, J., Gosselin, C.M. and Cheng, L., ‘Modelling and simulation of robotic systems with closed kinematic chains using the virtual spring approach’, Multibody System Dynamics 7, 2002, 145–170.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Wang, Y. and Wang, Z., ‘A time finite element method, for dynamic analysis of elastic mechanisms in link coordinate systems’, Computers & Systems 79, 2001, 223–230.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Munteanu, M.G., Ray, P. & Gogu, G. Method for a Fast and Simple Dynamic Analysis of 2D and 3D Mechanisms. Multibody System Dynamics 11, 63–85 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:MUBO.0000014887.07955.34

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:MUBO.0000014887.07955.34

Navigation