Skip to main content
Log in

Expression of a transgene encoded on a non-viral episomal vector is not subject to epigenetic silencing by cytosine methylation

  • Published:
Molecular Biology Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Currently available vectors for mammalian cells suffer from a number of limitations which make them only partially useful for genetic modification of eukaryotic cells and organisms and for gene therapy. While integration of a vector can lead to unpredictable interactions with the host genome and silencing of the integrated transgene, most non-integrating vectors mediate only transient expression of a transgene. All available vector types can lead to transformation of the recipient cell and many of them can cause serious immunological side effects in the organism. The ideal vector has to be free of these side effects and should allow long-term expression of a transgene in the absence of selection.

In this report we describe a novel non-viral episomal expression system fulfilling these criteria. The gene encoding the truncated rat NGF-receptor gene under the control of the CMV-promoter was inserted into a vector construct containing a scaffold/matrix attached region (S/MAR). This vector was then transfected into CHO cells and human HaCat cells. We show that this vector replicates episomally in these cells and is mitotically stable in the abscence of selection over more than 100 generations. Moreover, we provide the first experimental data that the CMV-promoter in an episome is not subject to silencing by cytosine methylation, thus allowing long-term expression of the transgene in the absence of selection.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kay MA, Glorioso JC & Naldini L (2001) Nat Med 7: 33–40.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Marshall E (2002) Science 298: 510–1.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Check E (2002) Nature 420: 735.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Somia N & Verma IM (2000) Nat Rev Genet 1: 91–9.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Nakai H et al. (2003) Nat Genet 34: 297–302.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Di Mayorca G., Callender J, Marin G and Giordano R (1969) Virology 38: 126–33.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Lipps HJ et al. (2003) Gene 304: 23–33.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Piechaczek C et al. (1999) Nucleic Acids Res. 27: 426–8.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Baiker A et al. (2000) Nat. Cell. Biol. 2: 182–4.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Jenke BH et al. (2002) EMBO Rep. 3: 349–54.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Stehle IM et al. (2003) Chrom. Res. 11: 413–421.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Teschendorf C, Warrington KH, Jr Siemann DW and Muzyczka N (2002) Anticancer Res. 22: 3325–30.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Radeke MJ et al (1987) Nature 325: 593–7.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Southern EM (1975) J. Mol. Biol. 98: 503–17.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Southern EM, Maskos U & Elder JK (1992) Genomics 13: 1008–17.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Boukamp P et al. (1988) J. Cell. Biol. 106: 761–71.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Prosch S et al. (1996) Biol. Chem. Hoppe Seyler 377: 195–201.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Collas P (1998) Nucleic Acids Res. 26: 4454–61.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Dang Q, Auten J & Plavec I (2000) J. Virol. 74: 2671–8.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jenke, A.C., Scinteie, M.F., Stehle, I.M. et al. Expression of a transgene encoded on a non-viral episomal vector is not subject to epigenetic silencing by cytosine methylation. Mol Biol Rep 31, 85–90 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:MOLE.0000031363.35839.46

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:MOLE.0000031363.35839.46

Navigation