Skip to main content

University Research Evaluation and Funding: An International Comparison

Abstract

Many countries have introducedevaluations of university research, reflectingglobal demands for greater accountability. Thispaper compares methods of evaluation usedacross twelve countries in Europe and theAsia-Pacific region. On the basis of thiscomparison, and focusing in particular onBritain, we examine the advantages anddisadvantages of performance-based funding incomparison with other approaches to funding.Our analysis suggests that, while initialbenefits may outweigh the costs, over time sucha system seems to produce diminishing returns.This raises important questions about itscontinued use.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Geuna, A., Martin, B.R. University Research Evaluation and Funding: An International Comparison. Minerva 41, 277–304 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:MINE.0000005155.70870.bd

Download citation

Keywords

  • International Comparison
  • Research Evaluation
  • Great Accountability