Skip to main content

Identifying axon guidance defects in the embryonic zebrafish brain

Abstract

The method described here outlines a simple protocol to investigate the in vivo function of axon guidance molecules during the development of the embryonic zebrafish brain. By 24 hours postfertilization, a simple scaffold of axon tracts and commissures can be visualised in the brain using acetylated α-tubulin, a panaxonal marker that stains all axons. The highly stereotypical trajectory of axons in the embryonic zebrafish brain provides an ideal system in which to study the molecular mechanisms of axon guidance, as defects in the axon scaffold can be clearly visualised. We describe here our approach to identify defects in the trajectory of axons that establish the initial template of tracts in the embryonic fore- and mid-brain. By combining immunohistochemical techniques and confocal microscopy on dissected wholemounts of embryonic brains we are able to observe at high resolution the complete scaffold of axon tracts. This approach provides a rapid and simple means of assessing axon guidance defects in the developing brain. Given the advantages of the zebrafish as a model system, and the range of molecular perturbation methods now available, this technique provides a valuable tool for assessing the phenotypic effects of gene perturbations in a biologically relevant context.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. Tessier-Lavigne M, Goodman CS (1996). The molecular biology of axon guidance. Science 274: 1123–1133.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Harris R, Sabatelli LM, Seeger MA (1996). Guidance cues at the Drosophila CNS midline: identification and characterisation of two Drosophila netrin/UNC-6 homologs. Neuron 17: 217–228.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kidd T, Brose K, Mitchell KJ, Fetter RD, Tessier-Lavigne M, Goodman CS, Tear G (1998). Roundabout controls axon crossing of the CNS midline and defines a novel subfamily of evolutionarily conserved guidance receptors. Cell 92: 205–215.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kidd T, Bland KS, Goodman CS (1999). Slit is the midline repellent for the robo receptor in Drosophila. Cell 96: 785–794.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Mann F, Ray S, Harris W, Holt C (2002). Topographic mapping in the dorsoventral axis of the Xenopus retinotectal system depends on signalling through ephrin-B ligands. Neuron 35: 461–473.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Whitford KL, Marillat V, Stein E, Goodman CS, Tessier-Lavigne M, Chedotal A, Ghosh A (2002). Regulation of cortical dendrite development by Slit-Robo interactions. Neuron 33: 47–61.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Nasevicius A, Ekker SC (2000). Effective targeted gene ‘knockdown’ in zebrafish. Nat Genet 26: 216–220.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bernhardt RR (1999). Cellular and molecular bases of axonal pathfinding during embryogenesis of the fish central nervous system. J Neurobiol 38: 137–160.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Wilson SW, Ross LS, Parrett T, Easter SS (1990). The development of a simple scaffold of axon tracts in the brain of the embryonic zebrafish, Brachydanio rerio. Development 108: 121–145.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Eisen JS, Myers PZ, Westerfield M (1986). Pathway selection by growth cones of identified motoneurons in live zebrafish embryos. Nature 320: 269–271.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Jontes JD, Buchanan J, Smith SJ (2000). Growth cone and dendrite dynamics in zebrafish embryos: early events in synaptogenesis imaged in vivo. Nat Neurosci 3: 231–237.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hjorth J, Key B (2002). Development of axon pathways in the zebrafish central nervous system. Int J Dev Biol 46: 583–596.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hutson LD, Chien C (2002). Wiring the zebrafish: axon guidance and synaptogenesis. Curr Opin Neurobiol 12: 87–92.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Gray M, Moens CB, Amacher SL, Eisen JS, Beattie CE (2001). Zebrafish deadly seven functions in neurogenesis. Dev Biol 237: 306–323.

    Google Scholar 

  15. McClintock JM, Kheirbek MA, Prince VE (2002). Knockdown of duplicated zebrafish hoxb1 genes reveals distinct roles in hindbrain patterning and a novel mechanism of duplicate gene retention. Development 129: 2339–2354.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Heasman J (2002). Morpholino oligos: making sense of antisense? Dev Biol 243: 209–214.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hjorth JT, Connor RM, Key B (2002). Role of hlx1 in zebrafish brain morphogenesis. Int J Dev Biol 46: 583–596.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Andersen, SSL (2001). Preparation of dissociated zebrafish spinal neuron cultures. Methods Cell Sci 23: 205–209.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Westerfield M, ed. (1995). The Zebrafish Book (3rd ed). Guide for the laboratory use of Zebrafish (Danio rerio). Eugene: University of Oregon Press.

  20. Kimmel CB, Ballard WW, Kimmel SR, Ullmann B, Schilling TF (1995). Stages of embryonic development of the zebrafish. Dev Dyn 203: 253–310.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Connor RM, Key B (2002). Expression and role of Roundabout-1 in the embryonic Xenopus forebrain. Dev Dyn 225: 22–34.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Devine, C.A., Key, B. Identifying axon guidance defects in the embryonic zebrafish brain. Methods Cell Sci 25, 33–37 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:MICS.0000006851.84998.e0

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:MICS.0000006851.84998.e0

  • axon guidance
  • embryonic brain
  • in vivo
  • morpholino
  • zebrafish