Skip to main content
Log in

Ray Fungi and Related Organisms (Actinomycetales)

  • Published:
Microbiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Sugden, A.M., Jasny, B.R., Culotta, E, and Penisi, E., Charting the Evolutionary History of Life, Science, 2003, vol. 300, p. 1691.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Daublin, V., Moran, N.A., and Ochman, H., Phylogenetic and the Cohesion of Bacterial Genomes, Science, 2003, vol. 301, pp. 145–146.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Woese, C.R., How We Do, Don't and Should Look at Bacteria and Bacteriology, The Prokaryotes: An Evolving Electronic Resource for the Microbiological Community, 3rd ed, Dworkin, M. et al., Eds., New York: Springer, 2003. htpp://link.springer-ny.com/link/service/ books /10125.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Lilburn, T.G. and Garrity, G.M., Exploring Prokaryotic Diversity, Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol., 2004, vol. 54, pp. 7–13.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Venter, C.J., Remington, K., Heidelberger, J.F., et al., Environmental Genome Shotgun Sequencing of the Sar-gasso Sea, Science, 2004, vol. 204, pp. 66–74.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Schleifer, K.-H., Microbial Diversity: Facts, Problems and Prospects, Syst. Appl. Microbiol., 2004, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 3–9.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Keller, M. and Zengler, K., Tapping into Microbial Diversity, Nature Rev. Microbiol., 2004, vol. 2, pp. 141–150.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bull, A.T., Ward, A.C., and Goodfellow, M., Search and Discovery Strategies for Biotechnology: the Paradigm Shift, Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev., 2000, vol. 64, pp. 573–606.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Krassilnikov, N.A., Luchistye gribki i rodstvennye im organizmy (Actinomycetales)(Ray Fungi and Related Organisms (Actinomycetales), Moscow: Akad. Nauk SSSR, 1938.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gutina, V.N., Nikolai Aleksandrovich Krassilnikov (Nikolai Aleksandrovich Krassilnikov), Moscow: Nauka, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kalakoutskii, L.V., Nikolai Aleksandrovich Krassilnikov, Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol., 1975, vol. 25, pp. 393–395.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Stackebrandt, E., Rainey, F.A., and Ward-Rainey, N.L., Proposal for a New Hierarchic Classification System, ActinobacteriaClassis nov., Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol., 1997, vol. 47, pp. 473–491.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Joseph, S.L., Hugenholtz, P., Sangwa, P., Osborn, C.A., and Janssen, P.H., Laboratory Cultivation of Widespread and Previously Uncultured Soil Bacteria, Appl. Env. Microbiol., 2003, vol. 69, pp. 7210–7215.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Issatchenko, B.L., Institute of Microbiology, 220 let Akademii Nauk SSSR. Spravochnaya kniga (220 Years of the Academy of Sciences of USSR), Moscow: Akad. Nauk SSSR, 1945, pp. 201–202.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Issatchenko, B.L., Microbiology in the Academy of Sciences of USSR), Mikrobiologiya, 1945, vol. 14, pp. 137–145.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Nadson, G.A. and Filippov, G.S., On the Effect of X-Rays on the Sexual Process and Mutant Induction in Lower Fungi (Mucoraceae), Vestn. Rentgenol. Radiol., 1925, vol. 3, pp. 305–310.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Avery, O.T., McLeod, C.M., and McCarty, M., Studies on the Chemical Nature of the Substance Inducing Transformation of Pneumococcal Types, J. Exp. Med., 1944, vol. 79, pp. 137–158.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Vavilov, N.I., The Law of Homologous Series of Inheritable] Variability, Sel'skoe Lesn. Khozyaistvo, 1921, no. 1/3, pp. 84–99.

  19. Aristovskaya, T.V., Vospominaniya (Recollections), St. Petersburg: ZAO Kopi Servis, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Berestnev, V., Zur Frage der Klassifikation und systematische Stellung der Strahlenpilze, Zentralbl. Bakteriol. I Orig., 1899, vol. 26, pp. 390–397.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Tsiklinsky, P., Surles mucedinees thermophiles, Ann. Inst. Pasteur, 1899, vol. 13, pp. 500–505.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Krainsky, A., Die Actinomyceten und ihre Bedeutung in der Natur, Zentralbl. Bakteriol. II, 1914, vol. 41, pp. 649–658.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Breed, R.S. and Conn, H.J., The Nomenclature of the Actinomycetaceae, J. Bacteriol., 1919, vol. 4, pp. 585–602.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Waksman, S.A. and Curtiss, R.E., The Actinomyces of the Soil, Soil Sci., 1916, vol. 1, pp. 99–134.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Lieske, R., Morphologie und Biologie der Strahlenpilze, Leipzig, 1921

  26. Oerskov, J., Investigation into Morphology of the Ray Fungi, Copenhagen, 1923.

  27. Jensen, H., Contribution to Our Knowledge of the Actinomycetales, Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S.W., 1932, vol. 57, pp. 364–372.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Filippov, G.S., Variability of Torulopsis glutinis (Torula glutinis) upon Irradiation with X-Rays, Vestn. Rentgenol. Radiol., 1932, vol. 10, pp. 512–517.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Orla-Jensen, S., Die Hauptlinien der naturlichen Bacteriensystem, Zentralbl. Bakteriol. II, 1909, vol. 22, pp. 305–317.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Kluyver, A.J. and Van Niel, C.B., Prospects for a Natural System of Classification of Bacteria, Zentralbl. Bakteriol. II, 1936, vol. 94, pp. 369–403.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Stanier, R. and Van Niel, C.B., The Main Outlines of Bacterial Classification, J. Bacteriol., 1941, vol. 42, pp. 437–466.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Baldauf, S.L., The Deep Root of Eukaryotes, Science, 2003, vol. 300, pp. 1703–1706.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Cavalier-Smith, T., The Neomuran Origin of Archaebac-teria, the Negibacterial Root of Universal Tree and Bac-terial Megaclassification, Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol., 2002, vol. 52, pp. 1–76.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Krassilnikov, N.A., Opredelitel' luchistykh gribkov (Determinative Manual of Ray Fungi), Moscow: Akad. Nauk SSSR, 1941.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Krassilnikov, N.A., Classification of Ray Fungi (Actino-mycetales), Mikrobiologiya, 1945, vol. 14, pp. 164–171.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Krassilnikov, N.A., Opredelitel' bakterii i aktinomitsetov (Determination Manual of Bacteria and Actinomycetes), Moscow: Akad. Nauk SSSR, 1949.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Waksman, S.A. and Henrici, A.T., The Nomenclature and Classification of the Actinomycetes, J. Bacteriol., 1943, vol. 46, pp. 337–341.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Khudyakov, Ya.P., Lytic Effect of Soil Bacteria on Parasitic Fungi, Mikrobiologiya, 1935, vol. 4, pp. 193–199.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Borodulina, Yu.K., Relations between Soil Actinomycetes and Bacillus mycoides, Mikrobiologiya, 1935, vol. 4, pp. 561–586.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Nakhimovskaya, M.I., Antagonism between Actinomycetes and Soil Bacteria, Mikrobiologiya, 1937, vol. 6, pp. 131–157.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Novogrudskii, D.M., Antagonistic Relations among Microbes and a Biological Method to Control Fungal Diseases of Plants, Usp. Sovrem. Biol., 1936, vol. 5, pp. 509–517.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Nakhimovskaya, M.I., A Review of Antagonism among Bacteria, Mikrobiologiya, 1938, vol. 7, pp. 238–264.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Krassilnikov, N.A. and Korenyako, A.I., Bactericidal Substance Produced by Actinomycetes, Mikrobiologiya, 1939, vol. 8, pp. 673–684.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Kriss, A.E., On the Lysozyme of Actinomycetes), Mikrobiologiya, 1940, vol. 9, pp. 32–38.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kalakoutskii, L.V. Ray Fungi and Related Organisms (Actinomycetales). Microbiology 73, 523–530 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:MICI.0000044243.92023.1f

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:MICI.0000044243.92023.1f

Keywords

Navigation