Abstract
The modern approach to the evaluation of measurement data in metrology is based on the mathematical formulation of the simple idea that any kind of information that is relevant for inferencing the measurand generates a corresponding state of knowledge about the measurand. This paper briefly discusses the basic concept of probability density function (pdf), which is the mathematical description of the state of knowledge about the measurand corresponding to given information. Two ways to establish a pdf are described. The recommendations for data evaluation in the Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement rest on this concept.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
ISO, Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement, International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, (1993).
P. M. Lee, Bayesian Statistics: An Introduction, Oxford University Press, New York (1989).
E. T. Jaynes, “Information theory and statistical mechanics, I,” Phys. Rev. 106, 620–630 (1957).
W. Wöger, “Probability assignment to systematic deviations by the principle of maximum entropy,” IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas., 36, 655–658 (1987).
E. T. Jaynes, “Prior probabilities,” IEEE Trans. Sys. Sci. and Cyber., SSC-4, 227–241 (1968).
M. G. Kendall and A. Stuart, The Advanced Theory of Statistics, Vol. 2, C. Griffin and Co. Ltd, London (1961).
K. Weise and W. Wöger, “A Bayesian theory of measurement uncertainty,” Meas. Sci. Technol., 4, 1–11 (1993).
M. G. Cox, P. Dainton, A. B. Forbes, P. M. Harris, H. Schwenke, B. R. L. Siebert, and W. Wöger, “Use of Monte Carlo simulation for uncertainty evaluation in metrology,” in: P. Ciarlini, M. G. Cox, E. Filipe, F. Pavese, and D. Richter (eds.), Advanced Mathematical Tools in Metrology V. Series on Advances in Mathematics for Applied Sciences, World Scientific Publishing Company, Singapore (2001), Vol. 57, pp. 93–104.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wöger, W. Information-Based Probability Density Function for a Quantity. Measurement Techniques 46, 815–823 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:METE.0000008438.11627.3f
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:METE.0000008438.11627.3f