Skip to main content

Human Cloning and Embryo Research: The 2003 John J. Conley Lecture on Medical Ethics

Abstract

The author, a member of the U.S.President's Council on Bioethics, discussesethical issues raised by human cloning, whetherfor purposes of bringing babies to birth or forresearch purposes. He first argues that everycloned human embryo is a new, distinct, andenduring organism, belonging to the speciesHomo sapiens, and directing its owndevelopment toward maturity. He then distinguishesbetween two types of capacities belonging toindividual organisms belonging to this species,an immediately exerciseable capacity and abasic natural capacity that develops over time. He argues that it is the second type ofcapacity that is the ground for full moralrespect, and that this capacity (and itsconcomitant degree of respect) belongs tocloned human embryos no less than to adulthuman beings. He then considers and rejectscounter-arguments to his position, includingthe suggestion that the capacity of embryos isequivalent to the capacity of somatic cells,that full human rights are afforded only tohuman organisms with functioning brains, thatthe possibility of twinning diminishes themoral status of embryos, that the fact thatpeople do not typically mourn the loss of earlyembryos implies that they have a diminishedmoral status, that the fact that earlyspontaneous abortions occur frequentlydiminishes the moral status of embryos, andthat his arguments depend upon a concept ofensoulment. He concludes that if the moralstatus of cloned human embryos is equivalent tothat of adults, then public policy should bebased upon this assumption.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

REFERENCES

  1. Bailey, R. “Are Stem Cells Babies?” http://www.reason.com/rb/rb071101.html

  2. Finnis, J. “Some Fundamental Evils in Generating Human Embryos by Cloning.” In Etica della Ricerca Biologia. Edited by C.M. Mazzoni. Florence: Leo Olschki, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Gilbert, S. Developmental Biology, 7th edition. Sunderland, Mass.: Sinnauer Associates, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Larson, W.J. Human Embryology, 3rd edition. New York: Churchill Livingstone, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Lee, P. “Human Beings are Animals.” In Natural Law and Moral Inquiry. Edited by R.P. George. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press, 1998, pp. 135-151.

    Google Scholar 

  6. “Metaphor of the Week” in Science, Vol. 295,No. 5560 (1 March 2002), p. 1637.

  7. Moore, K. and T.V.N. Persaud. Before We Are Born: Essentials of Embryology and Birth Defects. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Muller, W.A. Developmental Biology. New York: Springer Verlag, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  9. O'Rahilly, R. and F. Mueller. Human Embryology and Teratology. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  10. The President's Council on Bioethics, “Human Cloning and Human Dignity: An Ethical Inquiry.” Available at http://bioethics.gov/reports/cloningreport/index.html

  11. President's Council on Bioethics, Transcript of Meeting of Friday, January 18, 2002, Session 5, available at http://bioethics.gov/transcripts/jan02/jan18session5.html

  12. Singer, P. “Killing Babies is Not Always Wrong.” The Spectator, 16 September 1995, pp. 20-22.

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

George, R.P. Human Cloning and Embryo Research: The 2003 John J. Conley Lecture on Medical Ethics. Theor Med Bioeth 25, 3–20 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:META.0000025097.40977.da

Download citation

  • cloning
  • ethics
  • potentiality
  • rights
  • stem cells