Skip to main content
Log in

Integrity of Total Graphs via Certain Parameters

  • Published:
Mathematical Notes Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Communication networks have been characterized by high levels of service reliability. Links cuts, node interruptions, software errors or hardware failures, and transmission failures at various points can interrupt service for long periods of time. In communication networks, greater degrees of stability or less vulnerability is required. The vulnerability of communication network measures the resistance of the network to the disruption of operation after the failure of certain stations or communication links. If we think of a graph G as modeling a network, many graph-theoretic parameters can be used to describe the stability of communication networks, including connectivity, integrity, and tenacity. We consider two graphs with the same connectivity, but with unequal orders of theirs largest components. Then these two graphs must be different in respect to stability. How can we measure that property? The idea behind the answer is the concept of integrity, which is different from connectivity. Total graphs constitute a large class of graphs. In this paper, we study the integrity of total graphs via some graph parameters.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. V. Kumar, A Grama, A. Gupta,and G. Karpis, Introduction to Parallel Computing The Benjamin Cummings Publ., California, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  2. L. Lesniak and G. Chartrand,Graphs and Digraphs Wadsworth & Brooks, California, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  3. M.B. Cozzens and S.Y. Wu,“Edge neighbor-integrity of trees,”Austral. J. Combin.,10 (1994), 163–174.

    Google Scholar 

  4. M.B. Cozzens and S.Y. Yu,“Vertex neighbor-integrity of trees,”Ars. Combin.,43 (1996), 169–180.

    Google Scholar 

  5. V. Chvatal,“Tough graphs and Hamiltonian circuits,”Discrete Math.,5 (1973), 215–218.

  6. P. Dündar, “The tenacity of hypercube graphs and its some compounds,” Neural Networks World 3/99 (1999), 225–234.

    Google Scholar 

  7. P. Dündar, “Stability measures of some static interconnection networks,” Intern. J. Comput. Math., 76 (2001), no.4, 455–462.

    Google Scholar 

  8. P. Dündar, “Accessibility numbe and the neighbour-integrity of generalized Petersen graphs,” Neural Network World 2 (2001), 167–174.

    Google Scholar 

  9. P. Dündar and A. Ozan, “Stability measures of torus and mesh graphs,” Intern. J. Math. Algorithms (2002 (submitted)).

  10. P. Dündar and A. Ozan, “The neighbour-integrity of sequential joined graphs,” Intern. J. Comput. Math., 74 (2000), 45–52.

    Google Scholar 

  11. P. Dündar, “The neighbour-integrity of Boolean graphs and its compounds,” Intern. J. Comput. Math., 72 (1999), 441–447.

    Google Scholar 

  12. P. Dündar, “New notions in network reliability:stability numbers of sequential joined graphs,” Neural Network World 5 (1999), 403–411.

    Google Scholar 

  13. P. Dündar, “The stability measures of static interconnection networks and binary trees,” in:Proceeding of the Third International Symposium on Computer Networks İzmir,1998, pp.240–245.

  14. P. Dündar and O. Ten,“A new parameter for network stability: the neighbour-tenacity,” in:Proceedings of the 14th Intern. Symposium on Comput. and Information Sciences, Kusadasi,1999, pp.1016–1018.

  15. P. Dündar and N. Ö ürk, “The neighbour-integrity of recursive graphs,” in:Proceedings of the 2nd Intern. Symposium on Math. and Computational Applications, Baku,1999, pp.443–447.

  16. K.S. Bagga and L.W. Beineke, “Survey of integrity,” Discrete Appl. Math., 37/38 (1992), 13–28.

    Google Scholar 

  17. C.A. Barefoot and R. Entringer, “Vulnerability in graphs —a comparative survey,” J. Combin. Math. Combin. (1989), 113–122.

  18. L.W. Beinike, W. Goddard, P. Hamburger,and D.J. Kleitman, M.J. Lipman,and R.E. Pippert, “The integrity of the cube is small,” J. Combin. Math. Combin. Comput., 9 (1991), 191–193.

    Google Scholar 

  19. W. Goddard and H.C. Swart, “Integrity in graphs:bounds and basics,” J. Combin. Math. Combin. Comput., 7 (1990), 139–151.

    Google Scholar 

  20. K.S. Bagga, L.W. Beineke, M.J. Lipman,and R.E. Pippert, “Edge-integrity:a survey,” Discrete Math., 124 (1994), 3–12.

    Google Scholar 

  21. K.S. Bagga, L.W. Beineke, M.J. Lipman, and R.E. Pippert, “On the edge-integrity of graphs,” Congres. Numer., 60 (1987), 141–144.

    Google Scholar 

  22. K.S. Bagga, L.W. Beineke, M.J. Lipman, and R.E. Pippert,and R.L. Sedlmeyer, “A good algorithm for the computation of the edge-integrity of trees,” Congres. Numer., 67 (1988), 225–232.

    Google Scholar 

  23. F. Harary, Graph Theory Addison-Wesley Publ., California, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dündar, P., Aytaç, A. Integrity of Total Graphs via Certain Parameters. Mathematical Notes 76, 665–672 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:MATN.0000049665.92885.26

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:MATN.0000049665.92885.26

Navigation