Equity-based pay in the form of executive shareoptions (ESOs) is a controversial part of thetypical, US-style governance package, and ESOsin Germany are the focus of this paper. Aconventional view would see ESOs as a US-styleorganizational innovation diffusingglobally in general, and to Germany inparticular.
As an alternative to innovation diffusion,however, a translation perspective wouldsuggest that the diffusion of apparentlysimilar governance devices around the worldhides the actual adoption of differentpractices.
US/German comparative case studies arepresented as an empirical contribution thatgenerally shows a pattern so far consistentwith this translation view. In addition,intriguing and contrasting results are shownfor UK/German comparisons in the sense thatactual UK ESO plans are discovered to be moredistant from the US standard than German ones.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Adams, M.: 1998, “Cross Holdings in Germany”, Paper Presented to the 16th International Seminar on the New Institutional Economics, June 17–19. Wallerfangen/Saar.
Bebchuk, L.A., J.M. Fried and D.I. Walker: 2002, “Managerial Power and Rent Extraction in the Design of Executive Compensation”, University of Chicago Law Review 69: 751-846.
Berndt, C.: 1998, “Corporate Germany at the Crossroads? Americanisation, Competitiveness and Place Dependence', Economic and Social Research Council Centre for Business Research Working Paper #98. University of Cambridge.
Buck, T, A. Bruce, B. Main and H. Udueni: 2003, “Long-Term Incentive Plans, Executive Pay and UK Company Performance”, Journal of Management Studies 40: 1709-1727.
Combs, J.G. and M.S. Skill: 2003, “Managerialist and Human Capital Explanations for Key Executive Pay Premiums: A Contingency Perspective”, Academy of Management Journal 46: 63-73.
Driver, C. and G. Thompson: 2002, “Corporate Governance and Democracy: The Stakeholder Debate Revisited”, Journal of Management and Governance 6: 111-130.
Fortune: 2001, “Fortune 2001 Global 500”, Fortune, 23 July: F1-F43.
Hall, P.A. and D.W. Gingerich: 2001, “Varieties of Capitalism and Institutional Complementarities in the Macroeconomy: An Empirical Analysis”, Paper Presented at the American Political Science Association Conference. San Francisco.
Hofstede, G.: 1997, Culture's Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values (Beverly Hills: Sage).
Latour, B.: 1987, Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers Through Society (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).
Latour, B.: 1996, Aramis or the Love of Technology (Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press).
Megginson, W.L.: 2000, “Corporate Governance in Publicly-Quoted Companies”, Paper Presented at OECD Conference on Corporate Governance and State-Owned Enterprises in China, Jan 18–19. OECD, Beijing.
Murphy, K.J.: 1999, “Executive Compensation”, in O. Ashenfelter and D. Card (eds.), Handbook of Labor Economics, Vol. 3. (Amsterdam: North Holland).
Murphy, K.J.: 2000, “Performance Standards in Incentive Contracts”, Journal of Accounting and Economics 30: 245-278.
New Bridge Street: 1996, Paying for Performance: Long-Term Incentives in the Top 500 Listed UK Companies. (London: New Bridge Street).
Newman, K. and S.D. Nollen: 1997, “Culture and Congruence: The Fit between Management Structures and National Culture”, Journal of International Business Studies 27: 753-779.
Rogers, E.M.: 1995, The Diffusion of Innovations (New York: Free Press).
Rottenburg, R.: 1996, “When Organization Travels: On Intercultural Translation”, in B. Czarniawska and G. Sevón (eds.), Translating Organizational Change (New York: Walter de Gruyter).
Schilling, F.: 2001, “Corporate Governance in Germany: The Move to Shareholder Value”, Corporate Governance: an International Review 9: 148-151.
Westphal, J.D., R. Gulati and S.M. Shortell: 1997, “Customization or Conformity? An Institutional and Network Perspective on the Content and Consequences of TQM Adoption”, Administrative Science Quarterly, 42: 385-391.
Wright, P. and M. Kroll: 2002, “Executive Discretion and Corporate Performance as Determinants of CEO Compensation, Contingent on External Monitoring Activities”, Journal of Management and Governance 6: 189-214.
Yin, R.K.: 1995, Case Study Research: Design and Methods (London: Sage Publications).
Zeitz, G., V. Mittal and B. McAulay: 1999, “Distinguishing Adoption and Entrenchment of Management Practices: A Framework for Analysis”, Organization Studies 20: 741-776.
About this article
Cite this article
Buck, T., Shahrim, A. & Winter, S. Executive Stock Options in Germany: The Diffusion or Translation of US-Style Corporate Governance?. Journal of Management & Governance 8, 173–186 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:MAGO.0000026540.50790.81