Skip to main content

Scalar Implicatures in Complex Sentences


This article develops a Gricean account for the computation of scalarimplicatures in cases where one scalar term is in the scope ofanother. It shows that a cross-product of two quantitative scalesyields the appropriate scale for many such cases. One exception iscases involving disjunction. For these, I propose an analysis that makesuse of a novel, partially ordered quantitative scale for disjunction andcapitalizes on the idea that implicatures may have different epistemic status.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.


  1. Atlas, J. D. and S. C. Levinson: 1981, ‘It-Clefts, Informativeness, and Logical Form: Radical Pragmatics (Revised Standard Version)’, in P. Cole (ed.), Radical Pragmatics, Academic Press, NY, pp. 1–61.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Chierchia, G.: 2002, ‘Scalar Implicatures, Polarity Phenomena, and the Syntax/Pragmatics Interface’, unpublished manuscript, University of Milan Bicocca (to appear in A. Belletti (ed.), Structures and Beyond, Oxford University Press, Oxford.).

  3. Gamut, L.: 1991, Logic, Language, and Meaning, Volume 1, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Gazdar, G.: 1979, Pragmatics: Implicature, Presupposition, and Logical Form, Academic Press, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Grice, P.: 1975 [1967], ‘Logic and Conversation’, in P. Cole and J. L. Morgan (eds.), Speech Acts, Academic Press, NY, pp. 41–58.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Harnish, R.: 1976, ‘Logical Form and Implicature’, in T. Bever et al. (eds.), An Integrated Theory of Linguistic Ability, Crowell, New York, pp. 313–391.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hintikka, J.: 1962, Knowledge and Belief, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hirschberg, J.: 1991 [1985], A Theory of Scalar Implicature, Garland, NY (PhD thesis, University of Pennsylvania, PA).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Horn, L. R.: 1972, ‘On the Semantic Properties of Logical Operators in English’, PhD thesis, University of California, LA.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Horn, L. R.: 1989, A Natural History of Negation, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kadmon, N.: 2001, Formal Pragmatics: Semantics, Pragmatics, Presuppositions, and Focus, Blackwell Publishers, Malden, MA, and Oxford, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Landman, F.: 1998, ‘Plurals and Maximalization’, in S. Rothstein (ed.), Events and Grammar, Kluwer, pp. 237–271.

  13. Landman, F.: 2000, Events and Plurality, Kluwer, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Levinson, S. C.: 1983, Pragmatics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Levinson, S. C.: 2000, Presumptive Meanings, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Matsumoto, Y.: 1995, ‘The Conversational Condition on Horn Scales’, Linguistics and Philosophy 18, 21–60.

    Google Scholar 

  17. McCawley, J. D.: 1993, Everything that Linguists have Always Wanted to Know about Logic, 2nd edn, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Sauerland, U.: 2002, ‘The Present Tense is Vacuous’, Snippets 6.

  19. Schwarz, B.: 2000, ‘On Long Coordinations’, Talk at Tübingen University.

  20. Simons, M.: 2000 [1998], Issues in the Semantics and Pragmatics of Disjunction, Garland, NY. (PhD thesis, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Soames, S.: 1982, ‘How Presuppositions are Inherited: A Solution to the Projection Problem’, Linguistic Inquiry 13, 483–545.

    Google Scholar 

  22. von Fintel, K.: 2000, ‘Conditional Strengthening: A Case Study in Implicature’, unpublished manuscript, MIT.

Download references

Author information



Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sauerland, U. Scalar Implicatures in Complex Sentences. Linguistics and Philosophy 27, 367–391 (2004).

Download citation


  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Computational Linguistic
  • Epistemic Status
  • Complex Sentence
  • Scalar Implicature