This article develops a Gricean account for the computation of scalarimplicatures in cases where one scalar term is in the scope ofanother. It shows that a cross-product of two quantitative scalesyields the appropriate scale for many such cases. One exception iscases involving disjunction. For these, I propose an analysis that makesuse of a novel, partially ordered quantitative scale for disjunction andcapitalizes on the idea that implicatures may have different epistemic status.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Atlas, J. D. and S. C. Levinson: 1981, ‘It-Clefts, Informativeness, and Logical Form: Radical Pragmatics (Revised Standard Version)’, in P. Cole (ed.), Radical Pragmatics, Academic Press, NY, pp. 1–61.
Chierchia, G.: 2002, ‘Scalar Implicatures, Polarity Phenomena, and the Syntax/Pragmatics Interface’, unpublished manuscript, University of Milan Bicocca (to appear in A. Belletti (ed.), Structures and Beyond, Oxford University Press, Oxford.).
Gamut, L.: 1991, Logic, Language, and Meaning, Volume 1, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
Gazdar, G.: 1979, Pragmatics: Implicature, Presupposition, and Logical Form, Academic Press, NY.
Grice, P.: 1975 , ‘Logic and Conversation’, in P. Cole and J. L. Morgan (eds.), Speech Acts, Academic Press, NY, pp. 41–58.
Harnish, R.: 1976, ‘Logical Form and Implicature’, in T. Bever et al. (eds.), An Integrated Theory of Linguistic Ability, Crowell, New York, pp. 313–391.
Hintikka, J.: 1962, Knowledge and Belief, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY.
Hirschberg, J.: 1991 , A Theory of Scalar Implicature, Garland, NY (PhD thesis, University of Pennsylvania, PA).
Horn, L. R.: 1972, ‘On the Semantic Properties of Logical Operators in English’, PhD thesis, University of California, LA.
Horn, L. R.: 1989, A Natural History of Negation, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
Kadmon, N.: 2001, Formal Pragmatics: Semantics, Pragmatics, Presuppositions, and Focus, Blackwell Publishers, Malden, MA, and Oxford, UK.
Landman, F.: 1998, ‘Plurals and Maximalization’, in S. Rothstein (ed.), Events and Grammar, Kluwer, pp. 237–271.
Landman, F.: 2000, Events and Plurality, Kluwer, Dordrecht.
Levinson, S. C.: 1983, Pragmatics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
Levinson, S. C.: 2000, Presumptive Meanings, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Matsumoto, Y.: 1995, ‘The Conversational Condition on Horn Scales’, Linguistics and Philosophy 18, 21–60.
McCawley, J. D.: 1993, Everything that Linguists have Always Wanted to Know about Logic, 2nd edn, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
Sauerland, U.: 2002, ‘The Present Tense is Vacuous’, Snippets 6.
Schwarz, B.: 2000, ‘On Long Coordinations’, Talk at Tübingen University.
Simons, M.: 2000 , Issues in the Semantics and Pragmatics of Disjunction, Garland, NY. (PhD thesis, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.).
Soames, S.: 1982, ‘How Presuppositions are Inherited: A Solution to the Projection Problem’, Linguistic Inquiry 13, 483–545.
von Fintel, K.: 2000, ‘Conditional Strengthening: A Case Study in Implicature’, unpublished manuscript, MIT.
About this article
Cite this article
Sauerland, U. Scalar Implicatures in Complex Sentences. Linguistics and Philosophy 27, 367–391 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:LING.0000023378.71748.db
- Artificial Intelligence
- Computational Linguistic
- Epistemic Status
- Complex Sentence
- Scalar Implicature