Skip to main content
Log in

Effects of a Learner-Centred Environment on the Academic Competence and Motivation of Students at Risk

  • Published:
Learning Environments Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study examined the efficacy of a learner-centred environment in enhancing the academic achievements and motivation of high school students who are at risk of dropping out of school. Three groups of students at high academic risk were compared. The control group consisted of students who are exposed to a remedial academic program in a traditional school context, and the experimental groups consisted of students enrolled at schools that have implemented a structured academic program in a learner-centred environment. It is shown that a learner-centred environment yields significantly higher achievement scores and a somewhat higher internal motivational orientation. These results suggest that a structured academic program in a learner-centred environment could provide hope for students at academic risk and other students who are likely to be lost to the academic educational system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
€32.70 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Finland)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  • Alexander, P. A., & Knight, S. L. (1993). Dimensions of the interplay between learning and teaching. Educational Forum, 57, 232–245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, P. A., & Murphy, P. K. (1998). The research base for APA's learner centered psychological principles. In N. M. Lambert & B. L. McCombs (Eds.), How students learn: Reforming schools through learner-centered education (pp. 25–61). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Altan, M. Z., & Trombly, C. (2001). Creating a learner centered program. Forum, 39, 28–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Psychological Association Board of Educational Affairs. (1995). Learner-centered psychological principles: A framework for school redesign and reform. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Psychological Association Presidential Task on Psychology in Education and Mid-Continent Regional Educational Laboratory. (1993). Learner-centered psychological principles: Guidelines for school redesign and reform. Washington, DC: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ancess, J., & Darling-Hammond, L. (1995). Collaborative learning and assessment at International High School. In L. Darling-Hammond, J. Ancess, & B. Falk (Eds.), Authentic assessment in action (pp. 115–167). New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen-Navot, M., Ellenbogen-Frankovits, S., & Reinfeld, T. (2001). School dropouts and school disengagement: Research report. Jerusalem: JDC-Brookdale Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummins, J. (1994). From coercive to collaborative relations of power in the teaching of literacy. In B. M. Ferdman, R. M. Weber, & A. G. Ramirez (Eds.), Literacy across languages and cultures (pp. 295–331). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darling-Hammond, L. (1996). The right to learn and the advancement of teaching: Research, policy, and practice for democratic education. Educational Researcher, 25(6), 5–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1991). A motivational approach to self: Integration in personality. In R. Dienstbier (Ed.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation: Vol. 38. Perspectives on motivation (pp. 237–288). Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). Self determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic development, social development and well being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elmore, R. F. (1996). Getting to scale with good educational practice. In R F. Elmore (Ed.), Working together toward reform (pp. 1–27). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frisby, C. L. (1998). Contextual factors influencing the classroom application of learnercentered principles. In N. M. Lambert & B. L. McCombs (Eds.), How students learn: Reforming schools through learner-centered education (pp. 1–22). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fullan, M. J. (1993). Why teachers must become change agents. Educational Leadership, 51(7), 12–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, R. (1990). Testing and assessment: O tempora! O mores! Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh, Learning Research and Development Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanley-Maxwell, C., & Collet-Klingenberg, L. (1995). Research synthesis on the design of effective curricular practices in transition from school to community (Technical Report No. 9). Eugene, OR: University of Oregon, National Center to Improve the Tools of Educators. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 386 857)

    Google Scholar 

  • Harter, S. (1981). A new self-report scale of intrinsic versus extrinsic orientation in the classroom: Motivational and informational components. Developmental Psychology, 17, 300–312.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambert, N. M., & McCombs B. L. (1998). Introduction: Learner-centered schools and classrooms as a direction for school reform. In N. M. Lambert & B. L. McCombs (Eds.), How students learn: Reforming schools through learner-centered education (pp. 1–22). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, V. E., & Smith, J. B. (1995). Effects of high school restructuring and size on gains in achievement and engagement for early secondary school students. Sociology of Education, 68, 284–289.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCombs, B. L. (2001). What do we know about learners and learning? The learner centered framework. Bringing the educational system into balance. Educational Horizons, 79, 124–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCombs, B. L. (in press). Integrating metacognition, affect, and motivation in improving teacher education. In B. L. McCombs & N. Lambert (Eds.), Issues in school reform: A sample of psychological perspectives on learner-centered schools. Washington, DC: APA Books.

  • McCombs, B. L., & Whisler, J. S. (1997). The learner centered classroom and school: Strategies for increasing student motivation and achievement. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills, R. C., Dunham, R. G., & Alpert, G. P. (1988). Working with high risk youth in prevention and early intervention programs: Toward a comprehensive model. Adolescence, 23, 643–660.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Education (1993). The HILA program. Jerusalem: The Youth Advancement Service & ORT Israel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Education. (1996). The HILA program and the Miftanim alternative schools. Tel-Aviv, Israel: The Youth Advancement Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newmann, F. M. (1993). Beyond common sense in educational restructuring: The issues of content and linkage. Educational Researcher, 22(2), 4–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nieto, S. (1996). Lessons from students on creating a chance to dream. In R. F. Elmore (Ed.), Working together toward reform (pp. 77–111). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osterman, K. F. (2001). Students' need for belonging in the school community. Review of Educational Research, 70, 323–367.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raven, J. C. (1958). Standard progressive matrices. London: H. K. Lewis & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rossi, R. J., & Stringfield, S. C. (1995). What we must do for students placed at-risk. Phi Delta Kappan, 77(1), 73–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rury, J. L. (2002). Democracy's high school? Social change and American secondary education in the post-conant era. American Educational Research Journal, 39, 307–336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic development, social development and well being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, A. M., & Patrick, H. (2001). The classroom social environment and changes in adolescents' motivation and engagement during middle school. American Educational Research Journal, 38, 437–460.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarason, S. B. (1995). Parental involvement and the political principle: 0 why the governance structure of schools should be abolished. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, M. (1994). On schools where students want to be: A conversation with Deborah Meier. Educational Leadership, 52(1), 4–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tzuriel, D. (1989). Development of motivational and cognitive-informational orientation from third to ninth grades. Journal of Developmental Applied Psychology, 10, 107–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vatterott, C. (1995). Student-focused instruction: Balancing limits with freedom. Middle School Journal, 27(11), 28–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wehlage, G. G., Rutter, R. A., Smith, G. A., Lesko, N., & Fernandez, R. R. (1989). Reducing the risk: Schools as communities of support. New York: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weimer, M. (2002). Learner centered teaching: Five key changes to teaching. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinstein, R. S. (1998). Promoting positive expectations in schooling. In N. M. Lambert & B. L. McCombs (Eds.), How students learn: Reforming schools through learner-centered education (pp. 81–111). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Alfassi, M. Effects of a Learner-Centred Environment on the Academic Competence and Motivation of Students at Risk. Learning Environments Research 7, 1–22 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:LERI.0000022281.14968.4e

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:LERI.0000022281.14968.4e

Navigation