Abstract
We used the LANDIS disturbance and succession model to study the effects of six alternative vegetation management scenarios on forest succession and the subsequent risk of canopy fire on a 2791 km2 landscape in northern Wisconsin, USA. The study area is a mix of fire-prone and fire-resistant land types. The alternatives vary the spatial distribution of vegetation management activities to meet objectives primarily related to forest composition and recreation. The model simulates the spatial dynamics of differential reproduction, dispersal, and succession patterns using the vital attributes of species as they are influenced by the abiotic environment and disturbance. We simulated 50 replicates of each management alternative and recorded the presence of species age cohorts capable of sustaining canopy fire and the occurrence of fire over 250 years. We combined these maps of fuel and fire to map the probability of canopy fires across replicates for each alternative. Canopy fire probability varied considerably by land type. There was also a subtle, but significant effect of management alternative, and there was a significant interaction between land type and management alternative. The species associated with high-risk fuels (conifers) tend to be favored by management alternatives with more disturbances, whereas low disturbance levels favor low-risk northern hardwood systems dominated by sugar maple. The effect of management alternative on fire risk to individual human communities was not consistent across the landscape. Our results highlight the value of the LANDIS model for identifying specific locations where interacting factors of land type and management strategy increase fire risk.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Burns R.M. and Honkala B.H. 1990. Silvics of North America, Volume 2, Hardwoods. Handbook 654. USDA Forest Service, Washington, DC, USA, pp. 877.
Canham C.D. and Loucks O.L. 1984. Catastrophic windthrow in the presettlement forests of Wisconsin. Ecology 65: 803–809.
Cardille J.A., Ventura S.J. and Turner M.G. 2001a. Environmental and Social Factors Influencing Wildfires in the Upper Midwest, United States. Ecological Applications 11: 111–127.
Cardille J.A. and Ventura S.J. 2001b. Occurrence of Wildfire in the Northern Great Lakes Region: Effects of Land Cover and Land Ownership Assessed at Multiple Scales. International Journal of Wildland Fire 10: 145–154.
Cumming S.G. 2001. Forest Type and Wildfire in the Alberta Boreal Mixedwood: What Do Fires Burn? Ecological Applications 11: 97–110.
Frelich L.E. and Lorimer C.G. 1991. Natural Disturbance Regimes in hemlock-hardwood forests of the Upper Great Lakes Region. Ecological Monographs 61: 145–164.
Frelich L.E. and Reich P.B. 1999. Neighborhood effects, disturbance severity, and community stability in forests. Ecosystems 2: 151–166.
Gustafson E.J., Shifley S.R., Mladenoff D.J., Nimerfro K.K. and He H.S. 2000. Spatial simulation of forest succession and harvesting using LANDIS. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 30: 32–43.
Hansen M.H. 1992. The Eastwide forest inventory data base: user’s manual. Gen. Tech. Rpt. NC-151. USDA Forest Service, Washington, DC, USA.
He H.S. and Mladenoff D.J. 1999. Spatially explicit and stochastic simulation of forest-landscape fire disturbance and succession. Ecology 80: 81–99.
He H.S., Mladenoff D.J. and Crow T.R. 1999a. Linking an ecosystem model and a landscape model to study forest species response to climate warming. Ecological Modelling 114: 213–233.
He H.S., Mladenoff D.J. and Boeder J. 1999b. An object-oriented forest landscape model and its representation of tree species. Ecological Modelling 119: 1–19.
He H.S., Mladenoff D.J., Nimerfro K.K. and Gustafson E.J. 2000. LANDIS, A spatially explicit model of forest landscape disturbance, management, and succession: LANDIS 3.0 Users Guide. Forest Landscape Ecology Lab, Department of Forest Ecology & Management, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
Heinselman M.L. 1981. Fire intensity and frequency as factors in the distribution and structure of northern ecosystems. In: Mooney H.A., Bonnicksen T.M., Christensen N.C. (eds), Fire regimes and ecosystem properties. Gen. Tech. Rpt. WO-26, USDA Forest Service, Washington, DC, USA, pp. 7–57.
Host G.E., Polzer P.L., Mladenoff D.J. and Crow T.R. 1996. A quantitative approach to developing regional ecosystem classifications. Ecological Applications 6: 608–618.
Keys J. Jr., Carpenter C., Hooks S., Koenig F., McNab W.H., Russell W. and Smith M.L. 1995. Ecological units of the eastern United States: first approximation. USDA For. Serv. Southern Region, Atlanta, Georgia, USA, pp. 83.
Maclean A.L. and Cleland D.T. 2003. The use of geostatistics to determine the spatial extent of historical fires as an aid in understanding fire regimes for northern lower Michigan. In: Proceedings on the symposium on fire, fuel treatments, and ecological restoration. Proc. RMRS-P-29, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA.
Mladenoff D.J. and He H.S. 1999. Design, behavior and application of LANDIS, an object-oriented model of forest landscape disturbance and succession. In: David J. Mladenoff and William L. Baker (eds), Spatial modeling of forest landscape change: approaches and applications. Cambridge University Press, Wisconsin, USA, pp. 125–162.
Mladenoff D.J., Host G.E., Boeder J. and Crow T.R. 1996. LANDIS: A spatial model of forest landscape disturbance, succession, and management. In: Goodchild M.F., Steyaert L.T. and Parks B.O. (eds), GIS and environmental modeling: progress and research issues. GIS World Books, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA, pp. 175–180.
Morrison J. 1994. Integrating ecosystem management and the forest planning process. In: Jensen M.E. and Bourgeron P.S. (eds), Volume II: Ecosystem management: principles and application. PNW-GTR-318, 281–290. USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Portland, Oregon, USA.
Mutch R.W. 1994. Fighting fires with prescribed fire: a return to ecosystem health. Journal of Forestry 92: 31–33.
Pastor J. and Post W.M. 1986. Influence of climate, soil moisture, and succession on forest carbon and nitrogen cycles. Biogeochemistry 2: 3–27.
Radeloff V.C., Mladenoff D.J., Gustafson E.J., Scheller R.M., He H.S., Zollner P.A., and Akçakaya A. In Review. Modeling forest harvesting effects on landscape pattern in a fire-adapted ecosystem. Canadian Journal of Forest Research.
SAS Institute 1990. SAS/STAT user’s guide, version 6, fourth edition, volume 2. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, North Carolina, USA, 846 p.
Sokal R.R. and Rohlf F.J. 1969. Biometry. W.H. Freeman Co., San Francisco, California, USA, 776 p.
Stearns F.W. 1997. History of the Lake States Forests: Natural and human impacts. In: Vasievich J., Webster M. and Henry H. (eds), Lake States Regional Forest Resources Assessment: Technical Papers. Gen. Tech. Rep. NC-189, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, North Central Forest Experiment Station, St. Paul, Minnesota, USA, pp. 8–29.
Steel R.G.D. and Torrie J.H. 1980. Principles and Procedures of Statistics, Second Edition. McGraw-Hill, New York, New York, USA, pp. 633.
Sturtevant B.R., Zollner P.A., Gustafson E.J., He H.S. and Mladenoff D.J. 2003. Human influence on the risk of catastrophic fire in mixed-wood forests of northern Wisconsin, USA. Landscape Ecology (This issue).
USDA Forest Service 1986. Land a Resource Management Plan: Chequamegon National Forest. U. S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Eastern Region, Chequamegon National Forest, Park Falls, Wisconsin, USA.
USDA Forest Service 1999. Draft management area prescriptions and standards and guidelines. U. S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Eastern Region, Chequamegon-Nicolet National Forest, Park Falls, Wisconsin, USA.
Wolter P., Mladenoff D.J., Host G.E. and Crow T.R. 1995. Improved forest classification in the northern Lake states using multi-temporal Landsat imagery. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 61: 1129–1143.
Zhang Q., Pregitzer K.S. and Reed D.D. 1999. Catastrophic disturbance in the presettlement forests of the upper peninsula of Michigan. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 29: 106–114.
Zollner P.A., Roberts L.J., Gustafson E.J., He H.S., Mladenoff D.J. and Radeloff V.C. (in preparation). Modeling the influence of forest management alternatives on patterns of ecological succession in Northern Wisconsin, USA. To be submitted to Ecological Applications.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gustafson, E.J., Zollner, P.A., Sturtevant, B.R. et al. Influence of forest management alternatives and land type on susceptibility to fire in northern Wisconsin, USA. Landscape Ecol 19, 327–341 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:LAND.0000030431.12912.7f
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:LAND.0000030431.12912.7f