Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Effect of Intellectual Disability on Children's Recall of an Event Across Different Question Types

  • Published:
Law and Human Behavior

Abstract

This research examined the performance of 80 children aged 9–12 years with either a mild and moderate intellectual disability when recalling an innocuous event that was staged in their school. The children actively participated in a 30-min magic show, which included 21 specific target items. The first interview (held 3 days after the magic show) provided false and true biasing information about these 21 items. The second interview (held the following day) was designed to elicit the children's recall of the target details using the least number of specific prompts possible. The children's performance was compared with that of 2 control groups; a group of mainstream children matched for mental age and a group of mainstream children matched for chronological age. Overall, this study showed that children with either a mild or moderate intellectual disability can provide accurate and highly specific event-related information. However, their recall is less complete and less clear in response to free-narrative prompts and less accurate in response to specific questions when compared to both the mainstream age-matched groups. The implications of the findings for legal professionals and researchers are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington: Author.

  • Brennan, M., & Brennan, R. (1994). Cleartalk: Police responding to intellectual disability. NSW: Charles Sturt University, School of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cashmore, J. (2002). Promoting the participation of children and young people in care. Child Abuse and Neglect, 26, 837–847.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ceci, S. J., & Bruck, M. (1993). The suggestibility of the child witness: A historical review and synthesis. Psychological Bulletin, 113, 403–439.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ceci, S. J., Ross, D., & Toglia, M. (1987). Age differences in suggestibility: Psycholegal implications. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 118, 250–262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clare, I. (2001). Witnesses with learning disabilities. British Journal of Learning Disabilities, 29, 79–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conway, R. N. F. (1994). Abuse and intellectual disability: A potential link or an inescapable reality. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Developmental Disabilities, 19(3), 165–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dattilo, J., Hoge, G., & Malley, S. M. (1996). Interviewing people with mental retardation: Validity and reliability strategies. Therapeutic Recreation Journal, 30(3), 163–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dent, H. (1992). The effects of age and intelligence on eyewitnessing ability. In H. Dent & R. Flin (Eds.), Children as witnesses (pp. 1–14). Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dent, H. R. (1986). An experimental study of the effectiveness of different techniques of questioning mentally handicapped child witnesses. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 25, 13–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, D. W. (1998). Development of the self-concept in children with mental retardation: Organismic and contextual factors. In J. A. Burack, R. M. Hodapp, & E. Zigler (Eds.), Handbook of mental retardation and development (pp. 462–480). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fowler, A. E. (1998). Language in mental retardation: Associations with an dissociations from general cognition. In J. A. Burack, R. M. Hodapp, & E. Zigler (Eds.), Handbook of mental retardation and development (pp. 290–333). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fyffe, C. (1996). The contribution of intentional and automatic processes to the recognition memory of people with an intellectual disability. Unpublished doctoral thesis, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.

  • Goldman, R. L. (1994) Children and youth with intellectual disabilities: Targets for sexual abuse. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 41(2), 89–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, B. N., Jens, K. G., Hollings, R., & Watson, T. E. (1994). Remembering activities performed versus those imagined: Implications for testimony of children with mental retardation. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 23(3), 239–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henry, L. A., & Gudjonsson, G. H. (1999). Eyewitness memory and suggestibility in children with in mental retardation. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 104(6), 491–508.

    Google Scholar 

  • Home Office. (2000). Achieving best evidence in criminal proceedings: Guideance for vulnerable or intimidated witnesses, including children. London: Home Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iarocci, G., & Burack, J. A. (1998). Understanding the development of attention in persons with mental retardation: Challenging the myths. In J. A. Burack, R. M., Hodapp, & E. Zigler (Eds.), Handbook of mental retardation and development (pp. 349–381). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jens, K. G., Gordon, B. N., & Shaddock, A. J. (1990). Remembering activities performed versus imagined: A comparison of children with mental retardation and children with normal intelligence. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 37, 201–213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kantowitz, B. H., Roediger, H. L. III., & Elmes, D. G. (2001). Experimental psychology (7th ed.). Stamford, T: Wadsworth Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kernan, K. T., & Sabsay, S. (1989). Communication in social interactions: Aspects of an ethnography of communication of mildly mentally handicapped adults. In M. Beveridge, G., Conti-Ramsden, & I. Leuder (Eds.), Language and communication in people with learning disabilities (pp. 254–273). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leman, P. J., & Duveen, G. (1996). Developmental differences in children's understanding of epistemic authority. European Journal of Social Psychology, 26,(5) 683–702.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loftus, E. F. (1975). Leading questions and the eyewitness report. Cognitive Psychology, 7(4), 560–572.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahoney, G. (1988). Maternal communication style with mentally retarded children. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 92(4), 352–359.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menig-Peterson, C. L. (1975). The modification of communicative behaviour in preschool-aged children as a function of the listener's perspective. Child Development, 46, 1015–1018.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michel, M. K., Gordon, B. N., Ornstein, P. A., & Simpson, M. A. (2000). The abilities of children with mental retardation to remember personal experiences: Implications for testimony. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 29(3), 453–463.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milne, R., & Bull, R. (1998). Interviewing children with and without a learning disability (mental retardation). Paper presented at the American Psychological and Law Conference, Los Angeles.

  • Morse, C. W., Sahler, O. Z., & Friedman, S. B. (1970). A three-year follow-up study of a bused and neglected children. American Journal of Diseases of Children, 120, 439–446.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nesbitt, M., & Markham, R. (1999). Improving young children's accuracy of recall for an eyewitness event. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 20(3), 449–459.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pear, T. H., & Wyatt, S. (1914). The testimony of normal and mentally defective children. British Journal of Psychology, 6, 387–419.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pipe, M. E., & Salmon, K. (2002). What children bring to the interview situation: Individual differences in children's event reports. In M. Eisen, G. S. Goodman, & J. Quas (Eds.), Memory and suggestibility in the forensic interview (pp. 235–261). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, M. (2002). Specialist training in investigative and evidential interviewing: Is it having any effect on the behaviour of professionals in the field? Psychiatry, Psychology, & Law, 9(1), 44–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, M. B., Roberts, K. P., Ceci, S. J., & Hembrooke, H. A. (1999). The effects of a repeated experience on children's suggestibility. Developmental Psychology, 35, 1462–1477.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rudy, L., & Goodman, G. S. (1991). Effects of participation on children's reports: Implications for children's testimony. Developmental Psychology, 27(4), 527–538. S v. R (1989). 89 A.L.R., 321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saetermoe, C. L., Farruggia, S. P., & Lopez, C. (1999). Differential parental communication with adolescents who are disabled and their healthy siblings. Journal of Adolescent Health, 24, 427–432.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sattler, J. M. (2001). Assessment of children: Cognitive applications (4th ed.). San Diego: Jerome M. Sattler.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sigelman, C. K., Budd, E. C., Spanhel, C. L., & Schoenrock, C. J. (1981). When in doubt say yes: Acquiescence in interviews with mentally retarded persons. Applied Research in Mental Retardation, 2(4), 347–357.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sobsey, D., & Varnhagen, C. (1989). Sexual abuse of people with disabilities. In M. Caspero & L. Gougen (Eds.), Special education across Canada: Challenges for the 90s (pp. 199–218). Vancouver: Centre for Human Development and Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, K., Lamb, M., Hershkowitz, I., Yudillevitch, L., Orbach, Y., Esplin, P., et al. (1997). Effects of introductory style on children's abilities to describe experiences of sexual abuse. Child Abuse and Neglect, 21, 1133–1146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, K. J., Lamb, M. E., Hershkowitz, I., Esplin, P. W., Redlich, A., & Sunshine, N. (1996). The relationship between investigative utterance type and the informativeness of child witnesses. Journal Of Applied Developmental Psychology, 17, 439–451.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Psychological Corporation. (1999). Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence. San Antonio: Harcourt Brace & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vrij, A., & Winkel, F. W. (1994). Strategies to detect and reduce false statements of children: A social-psychological approach. Journal Of Police and Criminal Psychology, 10(1), 22–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weisz, J. R., Yeates, K. O., & Ziegler, E. (1982). Piagetian evidence and the developmental-difference controversy. In E. Zigler & D. Balla (Eds.), Mental retardation: The developmental-difference controversy (pp. 213–276). New Jersey: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westcott, H. L., & Cross, M. (1996). This far and no further: Towards ending the abuse of disabled children. Birmingham: Venture Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, C. (1995). Invisible victims: Crime and abuse against people with learning difficulties. London: Jessica Kingsley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, J. C., & Powell, M. (2001). A guide to interviewing children: Essential skills for counsellors, police, lawyers and social workers. NSW: Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wyatt, B. S., & Conners, F. A. (1998). Implicit and explicit memory in individuals with mental retardation. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 102(5), 511–526.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, K., Powell, M. B., & Dudgeon, P., (2003). Individual differences in children's suggestibility: A comparison between intellectually disabled and mainstream samples. Personality and Individual Differences, 35(1) 31–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zigler, E. (1982). Developmental versus difference theories of mental retardation and the problem of motivation. In E. Zigler & D. Balla (Eds.), Mental retardation: The developmental-difference controversy (pp. 163–211). New Jersey: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Deakin University, Burwood, Australia

    Sarah E. Agnew & Martine B. Powell

Authors
  1. Sarah E. Agnew
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Martine B. Powell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

About this article

Cite this article

Agnew, S.E., Powell, M.B. The Effect of Intellectual Disability on Children's Recall of an Event Across Different Question Types. Law Hum Behav 28, 273–294 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:LAHU.0000029139.38127.61

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:LAHU.0000029139.38127.61

Search

Navigation