Abstract
A substantial minority (35%) of the Dutch population is in favor of capital punishment. In this paper, it is argued that in a staunchly abolitionist country such as The Netherlands, the existence and perseverance of such support can be better understood and explained by conceiving of capital punishment support in attitudinal terms as part of a law and order syndrome. Death penalty attitudes are analyzed by means of hierarchic logistic regression analysis. It is shown that support can be modeled quite well, partly in terms of general attitudes to criminal justice, partly in terms of political and sociodemographic parameters. Within the criminal justice attitudes complex, more support is found among those endorsing harsh treatment of offenders, those willing to grant far-reaching powers to justice authorities, those believing that the government is not delivering on the topic of crime fighting, and those who are concerned about the level of crime. Within the political context, more support is enlisted among people who abstain from voting and those who vote at either extreme of the political spectrum as opposed to central parties' supporters. In sociodemographic segments it is the younger and poorly educated who are the strongest supporters of capital punishment. It is suggested that endorsing capital punishment can be better understood as an expressive act, displaying dissatisfaction with judicial and political elites in the country.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Atkinson, A. C. (1980). A note on the generalized information criterion for choice of a model. Biometrika, 67, 413–418.
Allport, G. W. (1935). Attitudes. In: C. Murchison (Ed.), A handbook of social psychology (pp. 798–844). Worcester: Clark University Press.
Amnesty International. (2002). Amnesty International Website against the death penalty. Retrieved from http://web.amnesty.org/rmp/dplibrary.nsf/index?openview
Bedau, H. A. (1992). The Case Against the Death Penalty. Washington: American Civil Liberties Union.
Bohm, R. M., Clark, L. J., & Aveni, A. F. (1991). Knowledge and death penalty opinion: A test of the Marshall hypotheses. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 28, 360–387.
Bohm, R. M., Vogel, R. E., & Maistro, A. A. (1993). Knowledge and death penalty opinion: A panel study. Journal of Criminal Justice, 21, 29–45.
Bowers, W. (1993). Capital punishment and contemporary values: People's misgivings and the court's misconceptions. Law and Society Review, 27, 157–175.
Bowers, W. J., & Pierce, G. (1988). The effect of executions is brutalization, not deterrence. In K. C. Haas & J. A. Inciardi (Eds.), Challenging capital punishment: Legal and social science approaches (pp. 49–90). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Cheatwood, D. (1993). Capital punishment and the deterrence of violent crime in comparable counties. Criminal Justice Review, 18, 165–181.
Cochran, J. K., & Chamlin, M. B. (2000). Deterrence and brutalization: The dual effects of executions. Justice Quarterly, 17, 685–706.
De Keijser, J. W. (2000). Punishment and purpose: From moral theory to punishment in action. Amsterdam: Thela Thesis.
De Keijser, J. W., Van der Leeden, R., & Jackson, J. L. (2002). From moral theory to penal attitudes and back: A theoretically integrated modelling approach. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 20, 317–335.
Duff, A., & Garland, D. (1994). Introduction: Thinking about punishment. In A. Duff & D. Garland (Eds.), A reader on punishment (pp. 1–43). New York: Oxford University Press.
Elffers, H. (2000). Kijkt u maar! Ontleedt u maar! Onthult u maar! [Please look, please dissect, please reveal: you 're welcome!]. In D. J. Hessing (Ed.), Lectures at the opening of the research school safety and security on society. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: OMV.
Ellsworth, P. C., & Ross, L. (1983). Public opinion and capital punishment: A close examination of the views of abolitionists and retentionists. Crime and Delinquency, 29, 116–169.
Fox, J. A., Radelet, M. J., & Bonsteel, J. L. (1990–91). Death penalty opinion in the post–Furman years. New York University Review of Law and Social Change, 18, 499–528.
Hessing-Couvret, E., & Reuling, A. (2002). Het WIN-model: Waardensegmenten in Nederland [The WIN-model: Value Segmentation in The Netherlands]. Amsterdam: NIPO.
Hood, R. (1996). The death penalty: A world wide perspective. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Hood, R. (2001). Capital punishment: A global perspective. Punishment and Society, 3, 331–354.
Houts, S., & Kassab, C. (1997). Rotter's social learning theory and fear of crime: Differences by race and ethnicity. Social Science Quarterly, 78, 122–136.
Human Development Report Office. (1999). Globalization with a human face. New York: United Nations (United Nations Development Programme, Human Development Report Office).
Jurow, G. L. (1971). New data on the effect of a 'death qualified' jury on the guilt determination process. Harvard Law Review, 84, 567–611.
McIver, J. P., & Carmines, E. G. (1981). Unidimensional scaling. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Menard, S. W. (2002). Applied logistic regression analysis (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Mirrlees-Black, C. (2001). Confidence in the Criminal Justice System: Findings from the 2000 British Crime Survey. London: Home Office.
Nagelkerke, N. J. D. (1991). A note on general definition of the coefficient of determination. Biometrika, 78, 691–692.
NIPO. (2002). NIPO Website. Retrieved from www.nipo.nl
Norusis, M. J. (1997). SPSS Professional Statistics 7.5. Chicago: SPSS.
Nunnally, J. C. (1981). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Radelet, M. L., & Akers, R. L. (1996). Deterrence and the death penalty: The view from experts. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 87, 1–16.
Rankin, J. F. (1979). Changing attitudes toward capital punishment. Social Forces, 58, 194–211.
Rundquist, E. A. & Sletto, R. F. (1936). Personality in the depression. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Sarat, A., & Vidmar, N. (1976). Public opinion, the death penalty and the Eighth Amendment: Testing the Marshall hypothesis. Wisconsin Law Review, 1, 171–206.
Snell, T. L., & Maruschak, L. M. (2002). Capital punishment 2001. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics.
Sociaal en Cultureel Planbureau. (1999). Sociale en Culturele Verkenningen 1999 [Social and cultural explorations 1999]. Rijswijk, The Netherlands: SCP.
Stinchcombe, A. L., Adams, R., Heimer, C. A., Lane Scheppele, K., Smith, T. W., & Taylor, D. G. (1980). Crime and punishment: Changing attitudes in America. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Thurstone, L. L. (1932). Motion pictures and attitudes of children. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Tyler, T. R., & Weber, R. (1982). Support for the death penalty: Instrumental response to crime or symbolic attitude? Law and Society Review, 17, 21–45.
Van der List, G. (2001). De dood als straf [Death as punishment]. Elsevier, 57(19), 22–31.
Van Koppen, P. J. (1997). De doodstraf [The death penalty]. In K. Wittebrood, J. A. Michon, M. J. Ter Voert (Eds.), Nederlanders over Criminaliteit en Rechtshandhaving [The Dutch on crime and law enforcement] (pp. 67–74). Deventer, The Netherlands: Gouda Quint.
Van Koppen, P. J., Hessing, D. J., & De Poot, C. J. (2002). Public reasons for abolition and retention of the death penalty. International Criminal Justice Review, 12, 77–92.
Van Praag, Ph. (2002). De LPF-kiezer: Rechts cynisch of modaal [The LPF voter: Right wing, cynical or modal]. In Jaarboek 2001 Documentatiecentrum Nederlandse Politieke Partijen [Yearbook 2001 Documentation Centre Dutch Political Parties]. Groningen, The Netherlands: DNPP.
Verkuyten, M., Masson, C. N. & de Jong, W. (1990). Nederlandse versie van Rundquist en Sletto's attitudeschaal ten aanzien van het recht [Dutch version of Rundquist and Sletto's attitude toward the law scale]. Nederlands Tijdschrift voor de Psychologie, 45, 134–137.
Vidmar, N., & Dittenhoffer, T. (1981). Informed public opinion and death penalty attitudes. Canadian Journal of Criminology, 23, 43–56.
Vidmar, N., & Ellsworth, P. C. (1974). Public opinion and the death penalty. Stanford Law Review, 26, 1245–1270.
Von Hirsch, A. (1993). Censure and sanctions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Waldo, G. (1981). The death penalty and deterrence: A review of recent research. In I. L. Barak-Glantz & C. R. Huff (Eds.), The mad, the bad, and the different: Essays in honor of Simon Dinitz (pp. 169–178). Lexington, MA: Heath.
Walker, N. (1991). Why punish? Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Warr, M., & Stafford, M. (1984). Public goals of punishment and support for the death penalty. Journal of Reserach in Crime and Delinquency, 21, 95–111.
Weigel, R. H., Hessing, D. J., & Elffers, H. (1999). Egoism: Concept, measurement and implications for deviance. Psychology, Crime and Law, 5, 349–378.
Zeisel, H., & Gallup, A. M. (1989). Death penalty sentiment in the United States. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 5, 285–296.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
About this article
Cite this article
Hessing, D.J., de Keijser, J.W. & Elffers, H. Explaining Capital Punishment Support in an Abolitionist Country: The Case of the Netherlands. Law Hum Behav 27, 605–622 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:LAHU.0000004889.11826.de
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:LAHU.0000004889.11826.de