Skip to main content
Log in

On Myth, Considered as a Method for Legal Thought

  • Published:
Law and Critique Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The textual form of law relates to language and not to narration but to myth. Law's text does not develop in the temporal sequence of past-present-future, but spreads by analogy of concentric circles. If ‘normal’ myth is a folklore of people then the law is a myth retold by lawyers. For the sake of separation of legal myth from mythology as a whole, law creates its own rituals. In post-modern societies the mythologization of law becomes even more important as the boundaries between legal and lay communities are challenged. Classical legal theories cannot deal with this change and Kafka's The Trial is as good a jurisprudence as any other legal theory.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gräzin, I. On Myth, Considered as a Method for Legal Thought. Law and Critique 15, 159–181 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:LACQ.0000035042.89262.d8

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:LACQ.0000035042.89262.d8

Navigation