Abstract
The development of new courses is strengthened by assessment and a response to the assessment. Two new science methods courses for elementary and secondary preservice teachers were developed, fostered by the Great Salt Lake Project. The preservice teachers designed and performed research projects that they then converted into inquiry-based teaching units. The professors applied a 3-layer assessment scheme to evaluate the courses and the preservice teachers based on changes in student attitudes, student-generated curricula, and internal course evaluations. Each type of assessment effectively informed the reform process, and strengths and weaknesses of the courses were revealed. Strengths of the courses included students learning to see science as a process and comprehending inquiry as a pedagogical approach. Weaknesses observed included a lack of understanding in three areas: the role of assessment, the need to address cultural issues, and the significance of scientific literacy.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abell, S. K., & Smith, D. C. (1994). What is science? Preservice elementary teachers' conceptions of the nature of science. International Journal of Science Education, 16, 475-487.
American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1990). Science for all Americans.New York: Oxford University Press.
American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1993). Benchmarks ofscience literacy.New York: Oxford University Press.
American Association for the Advancement of Science. (2002). Criteria for evaluating the quality of instructional support. Retrieved May 29, 2003, from http://www.project2061.org/research/textbook/hsbio/criteria.htm
Anderson, C. W. (2003). Difficulties with inquiry in science classrooms.Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Philadelphia.
Brown, C., & Borko, J. (1992). Becoming a mathematics teacher. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 209-242). New York: Macmillan.
Colburn, A. (1999). The journal of research in science teaching & inquiry: A thirtyyear review.Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Boston.
GessNewsome, J. (2002). The use and impact of explicit instruction about the nature of science and science inquiry in an elementary science methods course. Science & Education, 11, 55-67.
GessNewsome, J., & Lederman, N. G. (Eds.). (1999). Examining pedagogical content knowledge: The construct and its implications for science education. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishing.
Gwynn, J. W. (Ed.). (1980). Great salt lake: A scientific, historical, and economic overview. Salt Lake City: Utah Geological and Mineral Survey Bulletin 116.
Kennedy, M. M. (1991). Some surprising findings on how teachers learn to teach. Educational Leadership, 49(3), 14-16.
Latour, B. (1987). Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Lee, O. (2003). Promoting scientific inquiry with elementary students from diverse cultures and languages.Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Philadelphia.
Lederman, N. (2003). Inquiring about inquiry.Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Philadelphia.
Marsh, H. W., & Dunkin, M. J. (1997). Student's evaluations of university teaching: A multidimensional perspective. In R. P. Perry, & J. C. Smart (Eds.), Effective teaching in higher education: Research and practice (pp. 241-320). NewYork: Agathon.
McDevitt, T. M., Heikkinnen, H. W., Alcorn, J. K., Ambrosio, A. L., & Gardner, A. L. (1993). Evaluation of the preparation of teachers in science and mathematics: Assessment of preservice teachers' attitudes and beliefs. Science Education, 77, 593-610.
Moje, E. B., Collazo, T., Carrillo, R., & Marx, R. W. (2001). "Maestro, what is quality?": Language, literacy, and discourse in projectbased science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 469-498.
Moscovici, H. (1999). Shifting from activitymania to inquiry science: What do we (science educators) need to do? (Eric Document Reproduction Service Number ED444825).
Moscovici, H., & Nelson, T. H. (1998). Shifting from activitymania to inquiry. Science and Children, 35(4), 14-17, 40.
National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
National Research Council. (2000) Inquiry and the national science education standards. Washington, DC; National Academy Press.
National Science Foundation. (1996). Shaping the future: New expectations for undergraduate education in science, mathematics, engineering, and technology. Washington, DC: National Science Foundation.
Post, F. J. (1975). Life in the great salt lake. Utah Science, 36(2), 43-48.
Rawley, E. V., Johnson, B. C., & Rees, D. M. (1974). The great salt lake biotic system (Publication No. 7413). Salt Lake City: State of Utah Department of Natural Resources, Division of Wildlife Resources.
Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Education Researcher, 15(2), 4-14.
Shulman, L. S. (1990). Aristotle had it right: On knowledge and pedagogy (Occasional paper no. 4). East Lansing, MI: The Holmes Group.
Southerland, S. A. (2000). Epistemic universalism and the shortcomings of curricular multicultural science education. Science & Education, 9, 289-307.
Sparks, D., (1997), Reforming teaching and reforming staff development: An interview with Susan LoucksHorsley. Journal of Staff Development, 18(4), 20-23.
Sutherland, D., & Dennick, R. (2002). Exploring culture, language, and the perception of the nature of science. International Journal of Science Education, 24, 1-25.
Third International Mathematics and Science Study. (1996). Pursuing excellence: A study of U.S. eighthgrade mathematics and science teaching, learning, curriculum, and achievement in international context: Initial findings from the Third International Mathematics and Science Study (Publication 97198). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
Third International Mathematics and Science Study. (1997). Pursuing excellence: A study of U.S. fourthgrade mathematics and science achievement in international context (Publication 97255). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
Third International Mathematics and Science Study. (2000). Pursuing excellence: Comparisons of international eighthgrade mathematics and science achievement from a U.S. perspective, 1995 and 1999 (Publication 2001028). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
About this article
Cite this article
Baxter, B.K., Jenkins, C.C., Southerland, S.A. et al. Using a Multilevel Assessment Scheme in Reforming Science Methods Courses. Journal of Science Teacher Education 15, 211–232 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JSTE.0000047084.51834.a3
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JSTE.0000047084.51834.a3