Advertisement

Journal of Youth and Adolescence

, Volume 33, Issue 2, pp 101–112 | Cite as

The Right to Do Wrong: Lying to Parents Among Adolescents and Emerging Adults

  • Lene Arnett Jensen
  • Jeffrey Jensen Arnett
  • S. Shirley Feldman
  • Elizabeth Cauffman
Article

Abstract

In this study, 229 high school students and 261 college students evaluated the acceptability of lying to parents under 19 different circumstances where a person's motive for lying differed. Students also indicated the frequency with which they had lied to their parents about diverse issue such as friends, dates, and money. Results indicated that adolescents and emerging adults quite commonly lied to their parents, and that in part they framed lying to parents as a way to assert the right to autonomy. Emerging adults were less accepting of lying and reported less frequent lying, compared to adolescents. Results also showed the association of sex, personality (self-restraint and tolerance of deviance), and family environment (control and cohesion) upon adolescents' and emerging adults' acceptance of lying to parents and lying behavior.

adolescence emerging adulthood lying child-parent relations 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Arnett, J. J. (1992). Reckless behavior in adolescence: A developmental perspective. Dev. Rev. 12: 339-373.Google Scholar
  2. Arnett, J. J. (1997). Young people's conceptions of the transition to adulthood. Youth Soc. 29: 1-23.Google Scholar
  3. Arnett, J. J. (1998). Learning to stand alone: The contemporary American transition to adulthood in cultural and historical context. Hum. Dev. 41: 295-315.Google Scholar
  4. Arnett, J. J. (2000). Emerging adulthood: A theory of development from the late teens through the twenties. Am. Psychol. 55: 469-480.Google Scholar
  5. Arnett, J. J. (2002). Emerging Adulthood: Paths of Development From the Late Teens Through the Twenties. Manuscript submitted for publication.Google Scholar
  6. Asher, H. B. (1983). Causal Modeling. Sage, Newbury Park, CA.Google Scholar
  7. Berndt, T. J. (1979). Developmental changes in conformity to peers. Dev. Psychol. 15: 608-616.Google Scholar
  8. Berndt, T. J. (1996). Transitions in friendship and friends' influence. In Graber, J. A., Brooks-Gunn, J., and Petersen, A. C. (eds.), Transitions Through Adolescence: Interpersonal domains and context. Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ.Google Scholar
  9. Biddle, B. J., and Marlin, M. M. (1987). Causality, confirmation, credulity, and structural equation modeling. Child Dev. 58, 4-17.Google Scholar
  10. Bok, S. (1978). Lying: Moral Choice in Public and Private Life. Vintage Books, New York.Google Scholar
  11. Bregman, G., and Killen, M. (1999). Adolescents' and young adults' reasoning about career choice and the role of parental influence. J. Res. n Adolesc. 9: 253-275.Google Scholar
  12. Bussey, K. (1992). Lying and truthfulness: Children's definitions, standards, and evaluative reactions. Child Dev. 63: 129-137.Google Scholar
  13. Cauffman, E., Feldman, S. S., Jensen, L. A., and Arnett, J. J. (2000). The (un)acceptability of violence against peers and dates among adolescents and young adults. J. Adolesc. Res. 15: 672-693.Google Scholar
  14. Cochran, J. K., Wood, P. B., Sellers, C. S., Wilkerson, W., and Chamlin, M. B. (1998). Academic dishonesty and low self-control: An empirical test of a general theory of crime. Deviant Behav.: Interdiscip. J. 19: 227-255.Google Scholar
  15. Davis, S. F., Grover, C. A., Becker, A. H., and McGregor, L. N. (1992). Academic dishonesty: Prevalence, determinants, techniques, and punishments. Teach. Psychol. 19: 16-20.Google Scholar
  16. DePaulo, B. M., Kashy, D. A., Kirkendol, S. E., Wyer, M. M., and Epstein, J. A. (1996). Lying in everyday life. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 70: 979-995.Google Scholar
  17. Dornbusch, S. M., Carlsmith, J. M., Bushwall, P. L., Ritter, P. L., Leiderman, P. H., Hastorf, A. H., and Gross, R. T. (1985). Single parents, extended households, and the control of adolescents. Child Dev. 56: 326-341.Google Scholar
  18. Dornbusch, S. M., Ritter, P. L., Mont-Reynaud, R., and Chen, Z. (1990). Family decision-making and academic perfromance in diverse high school populations. J. Adolesc. Res. 5: 143-160.Google Scholar
  19. Dryfoos, J. (1990). Adolescents at Risk. Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  20. Feldman, S. S., Cauffman, E., Jensen, L. A., and Arnett, J. J. (2000). The (un)acceptability of betrayal: A study of late adolescents' evaluations of sexual betrayal by a romantic partner and betrayal of friend's confidence. J. Youth Adolesc. 29: 499-523.Google Scholar
  21. Feldman, S. S., and Weinberger, D. A. (1994). Self-restraint as a mediator of family influences on boys' delinquent behavior: A longitudinal study. Child Dev. 65: 195-211.Google Scholar
  22. Grotevant, H. D., and Cooper, C. R. (1988). The role of family experience in career exploration: A lifespan perspective. In Baltes, P. B., Featherman, D. L., and Lerner, R. M. (eds.), Life Span Development and Behavior. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 331-358.Google Scholar
  23. Grusec, J., and Goodnow, J. (1994). Impact of parental discipline methods on the child's internalization of values: A reconceptualization of current points of view. Dev. Psychol. 30: 4-19.Google Scholar
  24. Jensen, L. A. (1996). Coding manual: Ethics of autonomy, community, and divinity. In Different Habits, Different Hearts: Orthodoxy and Progressivism in the United States and India. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, University of Chicago.Google Scholar
  25. Jensen, L. A., Arnett, J. J., Feldman, S. S., and Cauffman, E. (2002). It's wrong, but everybody does it: Academic dishonesty among high school and college students. Contemp. Educ. Psychol. 27: 209-228.Google Scholar
  26. Jessor, R., and Jessor, S. L. (1977). Problem Behavior and Psychosocial Development. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  27. Kashy, D. A., and DePaulo, B. M. (1996). Who lies? J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 70: 1037-1051.Google Scholar
  28. Keltikangas-Jarvinen, L., and Lindeman, M. (1997). Evaluations of theft, lying, and fighting in adolescence. J. Youth Adolesc. 26: 467-483.Google Scholar
  29. Kohlberg, L. (1981). The Philosophy of Moral Development. Harper & Row, San Francisco.Google Scholar
  30. Kohlberg, L. (1984). The Psychology of Moral Development. Harper & Row, San Francisco.Google Scholar
  31. Lee, K., and Ross, H. J. (1997). The concept of lying in adolescents and young adults: Testing Sweetzer's folkloristic model. Merrill-Palmer Q. 43: 255-270.Google Scholar
  32. Lindskold, S., and Waters, P. S. (1983). Categories for acceptability of lies. J. Soc. Psychol. 120: 129-136.Google Scholar
  33. McCord, J. (1990). Problem behaviors. In Feldman, S. S., and Elliott, G. (eds.), At the Threshold: The Developing Adolescent. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 414-430.Google Scholar
  34. Millar, K. U., and Tesser, A. (1987). Deceptive behavior in social relationships: A consequence of violated expectations. J. Psychol. 122: 263-273.Google Scholar
  35. Moos, R., and Moos, B. (1974). Family Environment Scale (FES). Consulting Psychologists Press, Palo Alto, CA.Google Scholar
  36. O'Connor, T. G., Allen, J. P., Bell, K. L., and Hauser, S. T. (1996). Adolescent–parent relationships and leaving home in young adulthood. New Dir. Child Dev. 71: 39-52.Google Scholar
  37. Offer, D. (1969). The Psychological World of the Teenager. Basic Books, New York.Google Scholar
  38. Peterson, C. C. (1995). The role of perceived intention to deceive in children's and adult's concepts of lying. Br. J. Dev. Psychol. 13: 237-260.Google Scholar
  39. Peterson, C. C., Peterson, J. L., and Seeto, D. (1983). Developmental changes in ideas about lying. Child Dev. 54: 1529-1535.Google Scholar
  40. Piaget, J. (1932/1965). The Moral Judgment of the Child. The Free Press, New York.Google Scholar
  41. Roth, N. L., and McCabe, D. L. (1995). Communication strategies for addressing academic dishonesty. J. Coll. Stud. Dev. 36: 531-541.Google Scholar
  42. Smetana, J. G. (1988). Conceptions of self and social conventions: Adolescents' and parents' reasoning about hypothetical and actual family conflicts. In Gunner, M. R., and Collins, W. A. (eds.), Minnesota Symposium on Developmental Psychology (Vol. 21). Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ, pp. 79-122.Google Scholar
  43. Smetana, J. G. (1989). Adolescents' and parents' reasoning about actual family conflict. Child Dev. 60: 1052-1067.Google Scholar
  44. Smetana, J. G., and Asquith, P. (1994). Adolescents' and parents' conceptions of parental authority and adolescent autonomy. Child Dev. 65: 1147-1162.Google Scholar
  45. Stouthamer-Loeber, M. (1986). Lying as a problem behavior in children: A review. Clin. Psychol. Rev. 6: 267-289.Google Scholar
  46. Stouthamer-Loeber, M., and Loeber, R. (1986). Boys who lie. J. Abnorm. Child Psychol. 14: 551-564.Google Scholar
  47. Strickhartz, A. F., and Burton, R. V. (1990). Lies and truth: A study of the development of the concept. Child Dev. 61: 211-220.Google Scholar
  48. Turiel, E. (1983). The Development of Social Knowledge: Morality and Convention. Cambridge University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  49. Weinberger, D. A. (1997). Distress and self-restraint as measures of adjustment across the life span: Confirmatory factor analyses in clinical and nonclinical samples. Psychol. Assess. 9: 132-135.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lene Arnett Jensen
    • 1
  • Jeffrey Jensen Arnett
    • 2
  • S. Shirley Feldman
    • 3
  • Elizabeth Cauffman
    • 4
  1. 1.The Catholic University of AmericaUSA
  2. 2.University of MarylandUSA
  3. 3.Division of Child Psychiatry and BehaviorStanford UniversityUSA
  4. 4.Division of Law & Psychiatry, Western Psychiatric Institute & ClinicUniversity of PittsburghUSA

Personalised recommendations