Skip to main content
Log in

No-Arbitrage Interpolation of the Option Price Function and Its Reformulation

  • Published:
Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Several risk management and exotic option pricing models have been proposed in the literature which may price European options correctly. A prerequisite of these models is the interpolation of the market implied volatilities or the European option price function. However, the no-arbitrage principle places shape restrictions on the option price function. In this paper, an interpolation method is developed to preserve the shape of the option price function. The interpolation is optimal in terms of minimizing the distance between the implied risk-neutral density and the prior approximation function in L 2-norm, which is important when only a few observations are available. We reformulate the problem into a system of semismooth equations so that it can be solved efficiently.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Black, F., and Scholes, M., The Pricing of Options and Corporate Liabilities, Journal of Political Economy, 81, 637-659, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Dumas, B., Flemming, J., and Whaley, R. E., Implied Volatility Functions: Empirical Tests, Journal of Finance, 52, 2056-2106, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hull, J., and White, A., The Pricing of Options with Stochastic Volatility, Journal of Finance, 42, 281-300, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bates, D., Jumps and Stochastic Volatility: Exchange Rate Processes Implicit in Deutsche Mark Options, Review of Financial Studies, 9, 69-107, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bates, D., The Crash of 87, Was It Expected? The Evidence from Options Markets, Journal of Finance, 46, 1009-1044, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Jackwerth, J. C., and Rubinstein, M., Recovering Probability Distributions from Contemporary Security Prices, Journal of Finance, 51, 1611-1631, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Andersen, L., and Brotherton-Ratcliffe, R., The Equity Option Volatility Smile: An Implicit Finite-Difference Approach, Journal of Computational Finance, 1, 5-38, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Rubinstein, M., Implied Binomial Tree, Journal of Finance, 49, 771-818, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Derman, E., Kani, I., and Chriss, N., Implied Trinomial Trees of the Volatility Smile, Journal of Derivatives, 3, 7-22, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Coleman, T., Li, Y., and Verma, A., Reconstructing the Unknown Local Volatility Function, Journal of Computational Finance, 2, 77-102, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Britten-Jones, M., and Neuberger, A., Option Prices, Implied Prices Processes, and Stochastic Volatility, Journal of Finance, 55, 839-866, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Derman, E., and Kani, I., Stochastic Implied Trees: Arbitrage Pricing with Stochastic Term and Strike Structure of Volatility, International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Finance, 1, 61-100, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Andersen, L., and Andreasen, J., Jump-Diffusion Process: Volatility Smile Fitting and Numerical Methods for Option Pricing, Working Paper, General Re Financial Products, 2000.

  14. Hunt, P., Kennedy, J., and Pelsser, A., Markov-Functional Interest Rate Models, Finance and Stochastics, 4, 391-408, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Andressen, J., Implied Modeling: Stable Implementation, Hedging, and Duality, Working Paper, University of Aarhus, 1997.

  16. Ait-Sahalia, Y., and Duarte, J., Nonparametric Option Pricing under Shape Restrictions, Working Paper, Princeton University, 2001.

  17. Borwein, J., Choksi, R., and Marechal, P., Probability Distributions of Assets Inferred from Option Prices via the Principle of Maximum Entropy, Working Paper, Simon Fraser University, 2002.

  18. Duffie, D., Dynamic Asset Pricing Theory, Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Ait-Sahalia, Y., and LO, A., Nonparametric Estimation of State-Price Densities Implicit in Financial Asset Prices, Journal of Finance, 53, 499-547, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Shimko, D., Bounds of Probability, RISK Magazine, 33-37, 1993.

  21. Powell, M. J. D., Approximation Theory and Applications, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Andersson, L. E., and Elfving, T., An Algorithm for Constrained Interpolation, SIAM Journal on Scientific and Statistical Computing, 8, 1012-1025, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Dontchev, A. L., Qi, H. D., and Qi, L., Convergence of Newton's Method for Convex Best Interpolation, Numerische Mathematik, 87, 435-456, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Borwein, J. M., and Lewis, A. S., Partially-Finite Convex Programming, Part II: Explicit Lattice Models, Mathematical Programming, 57, 49-83, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Borwein, J. M., and Lewis, A. S., Partially-Finite Convex Programming, Part I: Quasi-Relative Interiors and Duality Theory, Mathematical Programming, 57, 15-48, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Mifflin, R., Semismooth and Semiconvex Functions in Constrained Optimization, SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization, 15, 957-972, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Qi, L., and Sun, J., A Nonsmooth Version of Newton's Method, Mathematical Programming, 58, 353-367, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Clarke, F. H., Optimization and Nonsmooth Analysis, Wiley, New York, NY, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Jiang, H., and Qi, L., Local Uniqueness and Newton-Type Methods for Nonsmooth Variational Inequalities, Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, 196, 314-331, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Sun, D., and Qi, L., Solving Variational Inequality Problems via Smoothing-Nonsmooth Reformulations, Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, 129, 37-62, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Warga, J., Fat Homeomorphisms and Unbounded Derivate Containers, Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, 81, 545-560, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Wang, Y., Yin, H., and Qi, L., Shape-Preserving Interpolation and Nonparametric Estimation for Option Price Function, Working Paper, University of New South Wales, 2002.

  33. Qi, L., and Jiang, H., Semismooth Karush-Kuhn-Tucker Equations and Convergence Analysis of Newton and Quasi-Newton Methods for Solving These Equations, Mathematics of Operations Research, 22, 301-325, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Qi, L., and Yin, H., A Strongly Semismooth Integral Function and Its Applications, Journal of Computational Optimization and Applications, 25, 223-246, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Huang, J., and Pang, J. S., A Mathematical Programming with Equilibrium Constraints Approach to the Implied Volatility Surface of American Options, Journal of Computational Finance, 4, 21-56, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Coleman, T., Li, Y., and Verma, A., A Newton Method for American Option Pricing, Journal of Computational Finance, 5, 51-78, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wang, Y., Yin, H. & Qi, L. No-Arbitrage Interpolation of the Option Price Function and Its Reformulation. Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications 120, 627–649 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOTA.0000025713.44548.71

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOTA.0000025713.44548.71

Navigation