Skip to main content
Log in

Dynamic Advertising Under Vertical Product Differentiation

  • Published:
Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We investigate a dynamic advertising model where product quality is endogenous. In the differential game between single-product firms, there exists a parameter range where the low-quality firm uses a more efficient advertising technology and earns higher profits than the rival. Moreover, we show that equilibrium qualities are the same under duopoly, multiproduct monopoly, and social planning, the only distortion being concerned with the output levels.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. JØrgensen, S., A Survey of Some Differential Games in Advertising, Journal of Economics Dynamics and Control, Vol. 4, pp. 341-369, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Erickson, G.M., Dynamic Models of Advertising Competition, Kluwer, Dordrecht, Holland, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Feichtinger, G., Hartl, R. F., and Sethi, P. S., Dynamic Optimal Control Models in Advertising: Recent Developments, Management Science, Vol. 40, 195-226, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Dockner, E. J., JØrgensen, S., Long, N. V. and Sorger, G., Differential Games in Economics and Management Science, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Schmalensee, R., A Model of Advertising and Product Quality, Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 86, pp. 1213-1225, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kotowitz, Y., and Mathewson, F., Advertising, Consumer Information, and Product Quality, Bell Journal of Economics, Vol. 10, pp. 566-588, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Conrad, K., Quality, Advertising, and the Formation of Goodwill under Dynamic Conditions, Optimal Control Theory and Economic Analysis, Edited by G. Feichtinger, North-Holland, Amsterdam, Holland, Vol. 2, pp. 215-234, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ouardighi, F. E., and Pasin, F., Advertising and Quality Decisions under Dynamic Conditions, 10th International Symposium on Dynamic Games and Applications, State University of St. Petersburg, St. Petersburg, Russia, July 8-11, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Case, J., Economics and the Competitive Process, New York University Press, New York, NY, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Sorger, G., Competitive Dynamic Advertising: A Modification of the Case Game, Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Vol. 13, pp. 55-80, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Moorthy, K. S., Product and Price Competition in a Duopoly Model, Marketing Science, Vol. 7, pp. 141-168, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Motta, M., Endogenous Quality Choice: Price vs Quantity Competition, Journal of Industrial Economics, Vol. 41, pp. 113-32, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Dutta, P. K., Lach, S., and Rustichini, A., Better Late than Early: Vertical Differentiation in the Adoption of a New Technology, Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, Vol. 4, pp. 563-589, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Gabszewicz, J. J., and Thisse, J. F., Price Competition, Quality, and Income Disparities, Journal of Economic Theory, Vol. 20, pp. 340-59, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Gabszewicz, J. J., and Thisse, J. F., Entry (and Exit) in a Differentiated Industry, Journal of Economic Theory, Vol. 22, pp. 327-338, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Shaked, A., and Sutton, J., Relaxing Price Competition through Product Differentiation, Review of Economic Studies, Vol. 69, pp. 3-13, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Shaked, A., and Sutton, J., Natural Oligopolies, Econometrica, Vol. 51, pp. 1469-1483, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Lehmann-grube, U., Strategic Choice of Quality When Quality Is Costly: The Persistence of the High-Quality Advantage, RAND Journal of Economics, Vol. 28, pp. 372-384, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Champsaur, P., and Rochet, J.C., Multiproduct Duopolists, Econometrica, Vol. 57, pp. 533-557, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Spence, A.M., Monopoly, Quality, and Regulation, Bell Journal of Economics, Vol. 6, pp. 417-429, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Mussa, M., and Rosen, S., Monopoly and Product Quality, Journal of Economic Theory, Vol. 18, pp. 301-317, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Vidale, M. L., and Wolfe, H. B., An Operations Research Study of Sales Response to Advertising, Operations Research, Vol. 5, pp. 370-381, 1957.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Leitmann, G., and Schmitendorf W. E., Profit Maximization through Advertising: A Nonzero-Sum Differential Game Approach, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, Vol. 23, pp. 646-650, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Feichtinger, G., The Nash Solution of an Advertising Differential Game: Generalization of a Model by Leitmann and Schmitendorf, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, Vol. 28, pp. 1044-1048, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Dockner, E. J., and Leitmann, G., Coordinate Transformations and Derivation of Open-Loop Nash Equilibria, Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Vol. 110, pp. 1-15, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Colombo, L., Lambertini, L. Dynamic Advertising Under Vertical Product Differentiation. Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications 119, 261–280 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOTA.0000005446.21301.d2

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOTA.0000005446.21301.d2

Navigation