Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A Cohort-Driven Assessment Task for Scientific Report Writing

  • Published:
Journal of Science Education and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A formative assessment task was developed to improve the scientific report writing skills of university students. Students undertaking this task typically possessed varying levels of scientific literacy and were drawn from a cohort of mixed abilities. The assessment task involved the construction of a scientific report that included feedback from instructor to students before final submission of the assessment piece. After initial submission of a scientific report, the instructor developed a cohort-specific marking scheme based on the deficiencies that were evident within the class group. Using a mixture of peer and self-review against specific criteria, the students were required to resubmit an amended report. This resulted in elevated marks compared with those that would have been obtained after first submission, thus rewarding the student for the application of feedback. This technique proved to be efficient for both parties and also resulted in improvement of skills of the entire student population, regardless of the ability of the student prior to the assessment task. Using this methodology, students of varying aptitudes were able to measure their own skill improvement against tangible criteria, and enjoy a degree of learning success independent of the ranking within their group.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Bowden, J., Hart, G., Kelly, B., Trigwell, K., and Watts, O. (1999). Generic Capabilities of ATN University Graduates, Teaching and Learning Committee, Australian Technology Network. Retrieved from http://www.clt.uts.edu.au/ATN.grad.cap.project.index.html

  • Brownlee, J., Boulton-Lewis, G., and Purdie, N. (2002). Core beliefs about knowing and peripheral beliefs about learning: Developing an holistic conceptualisation of epistemological beliefs. Australian Journal of Educational and Developmental Psychology 2: 1-16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cabrera, A., Crissman, J., Bernal, E., Nora, A., Terenzini, P., Pascarella, E. (2002). Collaborative learning: Its impact on college students' development and diversity. Journal of College Student Development 43(1): 20-34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dembo, M., and Praks Seli, H. (2004). Students' resistance to change in learning strategies courses. Journal of Developmental Education 27: 2-11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dweck, C. S. (1999). Self-Theories: Their Role in Motivation, Personality and Development, Psychology Press, Philadelphia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hidi, S., and Harackiewicz, J. M. (2000). Motivating the academically unmotivated: Acritical issue for the 21st century. Review of Educational Research 70(2): 151-179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Imel, S. (1991). Collaborative Learning in Adult Education, ERIC digest no. 113. Retrieved from http://www.ericfaculty.net/ericdigests/ed334469.html

  • Kuhn, D. (2000). Metacognitive development. Current Directions in Psychological Science 9(5): 178-181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lui, E., Lin, S., and Yuan, S. (2002). Alternatives to instructor assessment: A case study of comparing self and peer assessment with instructor assessment under a networked innovative as-sessment procedures. International Journal of Instructional Media 29: 395-404.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundberg, C. A(2003). Nontraditional college students and the role of collaborative learning as a tool for science mastery. School Science and Mathematics 103: 8-17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Midgley, C., Kaplan, A., and Middleton, M. (2001). Performance-approach goals: Good for what, for whom, under what circumstances and at what cost? Journal of Educational Psychology 93: 77-86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scoufis, M. (2000). Integrating Graduate Attributes into the Undergraduate Curricula, University of Western Sydney, Penrith.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taras, M. (2002). Using assessment for learning and learning from assessment. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 27(6): 501-510.

    Google Scholar 

  • Topping, K. (1998). Peer assessment between students in colleges and universities. Review of Educational Research 68(3): 249-276.

    Google Scholar 

  • UWS (1998). Student Intake Survey, University of Western Sydney, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Science, Food and Horticulture, University of Western Sydney, Parramatta Campus, Locked Bag 1797, Penrith South DC, New South Wales 1797, Australia

    Jo-Anne Chuck & Lauren Young

Authors
  1. Jo-Anne Chuck
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Lauren Young
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chuck, JA., Young, L. A Cohort-Driven Assessment Task for Scientific Report Writing. Journal of Science Education and Technology 13, 367–376 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOST.0000045464.33978.ff

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOST.0000045464.33978.ff

Search

Navigation