A Comparison of Inquiry and Worked Example Web-Based Instruction Using Physlets
This paper compares two protocols for web-based instruction using simulations in an introductory physics class. The Inquiry protocol allowed students to control input parameters while the Worked Example protocol did not. Students in the Worked Example group performed significantly higher on a common assessment. The ramifications of this study are discussed in relation to Scientific Discovery Learning and Cognitive Load Theory.
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Bonham, S., and Risley, J. (1999). Using Physlets to teach Electrostatics. The Physics Teacher 37: 276-280.Google Scholar
- Chandler, P., and Sweller, J. (1991). Cognitive Load Theory and the format of instruction. Learning and Instruction 8: 292-332.Google Scholar
- Chandler, P., and Sweller, J. (1992). The split-attention effect as a factor in the design of instruction. British Journal of Educational Psychology 62: 233-246.Google Scholar
- Christian, W., and Belloni, M. (2001). Physlets: Teaching Physics With Interactive Curricular Material, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.Google Scholar
- Christian, W., and Titus, A. (1998). Developing web-based curricula using Java Physlets. Computers in Physics 12: 227-232.Google Scholar
- De Jong, T., and van Joolingen, W. (1998). Scientific discovery learning with computer simulations of conceptual domains. Review of Educational Research 68: 179-201.Google Scholar
- Sweller, J. (1994). Cognitive Load Theory, learningdifficulty, and instructional design. Learning and Instruction 4: 295-312.Google Scholar
- Sweller, J., and Cooper, G. A. (1995). The use of worked examples as a substitute for problems solving in learning Algebra. Cognition and Instruction 2: 59-89.Google Scholar