Abstract
This paper reports a test on the feasibility and educational value of probeware and associated instructional materials in middle school science education. We addressed feasibility through consideration of costs, teacher professional development, and instructional design. In order to test our approach, we developed 2 middle school science curriculum units, 6 low-cost probes that interface between handheld Palm computers, and CCLabBook software for the Palms that presents the curriculum, interfaces with the probes for data collection and visualization, and supports guided exploration. The materials were tested by 30 teachers in the first year, and in a follow-up study by 8 of those teachers the second year. We found that teachers were able to conduct the investigations successfully in their classrooms, and that student learning was enhanced through the use of the probes and handhelds. Specifically, students experienced the physical correlation between phenomenon and modeling, which helped them to develop understanding and to confront misconceptions.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Adams, D. D., and Shrum, J. W. (1990). The effects of microcomputer-based laboratory exercises on the acquisition of line graph construction and interpretation skills by high school biology students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 27: 777-787.
Beichner, R. J. (1990). The effect of simultaneous motion presentation and graph generation in a kinematics lab. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 27: 803-815.
Berenfeld, B. (1994). Technology and the new model of science education: The Global Lab Experience. Machine-Mediated Learning 4: 203-227.
Brassell, H. (1987). The effect of real-time laboratory graphing on learning graphic representations of distance and velocity. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 24: 385-395.
Krajcik, J. S., and Layman, J. W. (1992). Microcomputer-based laboratories in the science classroom. In Lawrenz, F., Cochran, K., Krajcik, J., and Simpson, P. (Eds.), Research Matters to the Science Teacher. Manhattan, KS: National Association of Research in Science Teaching.
Laws, P. (1997). Millikan lecture 1996: Promoting active learning based on physics education research in introductory courses. American Journals of Physics 65: 14-21.
Linn, M. C., Layman, J. W., and Nachmias, R. (1987). Cognitive consequences of microcomputer-based laboratories: Graphing skills development. Contemporary Educational Psychology 12: 244-253.
Mokros, J., and Tinker, R. (1987). The impact of microcomputer-based labs on children's ability to interpret graphs. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 24: 369-383.
Songer, N. B. (1996). Exploring learning opportunities in coordinated network-enhanced classrooms—A case of kids as global scientists. Journal of the Learning Sciences 5: 297-327.
Thorton, R. K. (1987). Tools for scientific thinking: Microcomputer-based laboratory for physics teaching. Physics Education 22: 230-238.
Tinker, R. (1996). The Whole World in Their Hands, Department of Education, Washington, DC. Available at http://www.ed.gov/Technology/Futures/tinker.html
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Metcalf, S.J., Tinker, R.F. Probeware and Handhelds in Elementary and Middle School Science. Journal of Science Education and Technology 13, 43–49 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOST.0000019637.22473.02
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOST.0000019637.22473.02