Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Fostering Students' Epistemologies of Models via Authentic Model-Based Tasks

  • Published:
Journal of Science Education and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A curriculum unit for middle school Earth Science called “What's on Your Plate?” was designed. The unit was implemented in several middle and high school classrooms in California and Massachusetts. In the first implementation, the total number of students who participated was 1100. The unit was designed with two main pedagogical principles: make thinking visible, and help students learn from one another; both were derived from an inquiry-based framework. With these two main pedagogical principles as a larger guiding framework, we designed the curriculum to provide students with rich, iterative model-based activities for students to both learn with and provide criteria for them to critique their peers' work from the opposite coast. The goal here was to influence students' understanding of the domain as well as their understanding of the nature of models in science by engaging them in an authentic context in which they constructed and reasoned with models, as well as critiqued the models of their peers. Data from 15 classrooms is described both in terms of the gains students made of their understanding of the nature of models as measured by pencil and paper survey administered both before and after the unit. In addition, a small subset of students' data is shown to illustrate advances in students' understanding of models. Lastly, we show how students with more sophisticated epistemologies of models are better able to further their content understanding as compared to students with less sophisticated epistemologies of models.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Abd-El-Khalick, F., and Lederman, N. G. (2000). The influence of history of science courses on student's views of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 37(10): 1057-1095.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, P. (1998). Designing for Students' Science Instruction Using Argumentation to Classroom Debate, Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, P., and Linn, M. C. (2002). Beliefs about science: How science instruction contribute? In Hofer, B., and Pintrich, P. (Eds.), Personal Epistemology: The Psychology of Beliefs About Knowledge and Knowing, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 103-118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bencloski, J. W., and Heyl, R. J. (1985). Teaching plate tectonics with the aid of a model of sea-floor dynamics. Journal of Geological Education 33: 274-276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, A. L. (1992). Design experiments: Theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions in classroom settings. Journal of the Learning Sciences 2: 141-178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burbules, N. C., and Linn, M. C. (1991). Science education and the philosophy of science: Congruence or contradiction? International Journal of Science Education 13: 227-241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carey, S., and Smith, C. (1993). On understanding the nature of scientific knowledge. Educational Psychologist 28: 235-251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carey, S., and Smith, C. (1995). On understanding the nature of scientific knowledge. In Perkins, D., Schwartz, J., Maxwell West, M., and Stone Wiske, M. (Eds.), Software Goes to School, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Champagne, A. B., Klopfer, L. E., and Anderson, J. H. (1980). Factors influencing the learning of classical mechanics. American Journal of Physics 48: 1074-1079.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Z., and Klahr, D. (1999). All other things being equal: Children's acquisition and transfer of the Control of Variables Strategy. Child Development 70: 1098-1120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chi, M. M. T., de Leuw, N., Chiu, M. H., and LaVancher, C. (1994). Eliciting self-explanations improves understanding. Cognitive Science 18: 439-478.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clement, J., Brown, B., and Zietsman, A. (1989). Not all preconceptions are misconceptions: Finding “anchoring conceptions” for grounding instruction on students' intuitions. International Journal of Science Education 11: 554-565.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, E. (1995). Learning by explaining: Fostering collaborative progressive discourse in science. In Beun, R. J., Baker, M. J., and Reiner, M. (Eds.), Natural Dialogue and Interactive Student Modeling, Springer, Berlin, Germany, pp. 123-135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, A., Brown, J. S., and Hollum, A. (1991). Cognitive apprenticeship: Making thinking visible. American Educator 6: 38-46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, E. A. (1998). Scaffolding Students' Reflection for Science Learning, Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • di Sessa, A. A. (1991). Local sciences: Viewing the design of human–computer systems as cognitive science. In Carroll, J. M. (Ed.), Designing Interaction: Psychology at the Human–Computer Interface, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, pp. 162-202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Driver, R., Guesne, E., and Tiberghien, A. (1985). Children's Ideas in Science, Open University Press, Philadelphia, PA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feather, R., Snyder, S., and Hesser, D. (1995). Earth Science, Glencoe/McGraw-Hill, Westerville, OH.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frederiksen, J., White, B., and Gutwill, J. (1999). Dynamic mental models in learning science: The importance of constructing derivational linkages among models. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 36(7): 806-836.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, S. (1991). Model building and a definition of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 28: 73-79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, R. (1976). Cognitive psychology and instructional design. In Klahr, D. (Ed.),Cognition and Instruction, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 303-316.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gobert, J. (1994). Expertise in the Comprehension of Architectural Plans: Contribution of Representation and Domain Knowledge, Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gobert, J. (1997a). The effects of summarizing, explaining, and diagramming on text-base representations and mental models. Presented at the Eighth Annual Winter Text Conference, Jackson Hole, WY, January 18–24, 1997.

  • Gobert, J. (1997b). Summarizing, explaining, and diagramming: The differential effects on text-base representations and mental models. Presented at the Nineteenth Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, August 7–10, 1997.

  • Gobert, J. (2000). A typology of models for plate tectonics: Inferential power and barriers to understanding. International Journal of Science Education 22: 937-977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gobert, J. (2003). Students' Collaborative Model-Building and Peer Critique On-line. Presented at the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Philadelphia, PA, March 23–26.

  • Gobert, J., and Buckley, B. (2000). Special issue editorial: Introduction to model-based teaching and learning. International Journal of Science Education 22: 891-894.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gobert, J., and Clement, J. (1994). Promoting causal model construction in science through student-generated diagrams. Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA, April 4–8, 1994.

  • Gobert, J., and Clement, J. (1999). Effects of student-generated diagrams versus student-generated summaries on conceptual understanding of causal and dynamic knowledge in plate tectonics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 36: 39-53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gobert, J., Coleman, E., Scardamalia, M., and Bereiter, C. (1993). Restructuring the classroom: Implementing knowledge-building via CSILE. Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Atlanta, GA.

  • Gobert, J., and Discenna, J. (1997). The Relationship Between Students' Epistemologies and Model-Based Reasoning (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED409164), Western Michigan University, Department of Science Studies, Kalamazoo, MI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gobert, J., and Frederiksen, C. (1988). The comprehension of architectural plans by expert and sub-expert architects. Proceedings of the Tenth Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, Montreal, Canada, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 651-657.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gobert, J., Slotta, J., and Pallant, A. (2001). A WISE Inquiry Project for students' East-West Coast collaboration. Submitted to the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA, April 1–5, 2001.

  • Gobert, J., Slotta, J., Pallant, A., Nagy, S., and Targum, E. (2002a). A WISE Inquiry Project for students' East-West Coast collaboration. Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LO, April 1–5, 2002.

  • Gobert, J., Snyder, J., and Houghton, C. (2002b). The influence of students' understanding of models on model-based reasoning. Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LO, April 1–5, 2002.

  • Grosslight, L., Unger, C., Jay, E., and Smith, C. (1991). Understanding models and their use in science: Conceptions of middle and high school students and experts. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 28: 799-822.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammer, D. (1994). Epistemological beliefs in introductory physics. Cognition and Instruction 12: 151-183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammer, D. (1995). Epistemological considerations in teaching introductory physics. Science Education 79: 393-413.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammer, D. (2001, July). Informal Discussion at CILT Epistemology Workshop, Concord, MA, The Concord Consortium.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammer, D., and Elby, A. (2002). On the form of a personal epistemology. In Hofer, B., and Pintrich, P. (Eds.), Personal Epistemology: The Psychology of Beliefs About Knowledge and Knowing, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofer, B., and Pintrich, P. (2002). Personal Epistemology: The Psychology of Beliefs About Knowledge and Knowing, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inhelder, B., and Piaget, J. (1958). The Growth of Logical Thinking From Childhood to Adolescence, Basic Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, S., Stratford, S., Krajcik, J., and Soloway, E. (1994). Making dynamic modeling accessible to pre-college science students. Interactive Learning Environments 4: 233-257.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kindfield, A. A. C. (1993). Biology diagrams: Tools to think with. Journal of the Learning Sciences 3: 1-36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larkin, J., and Simon, H. (1987). Why a diagram is (sometimes) worth ten thousand words. Cognitive Science 11: 65-100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Grand, H. E. (1991). Drifting Continents and Shifting Theories, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linn, M. C. (1998). Supporting Teachers and Encouraging Lifelong Learning: A Web-Based Integrated Science Environment (WISE), Proposal funded by the National Science Foundation.

  • Linn, M. C., diSessa, A., Pea, R. D., and Songer, N. B. (1994). Can research on science learning and instruction inform standards for science education? Journal of Science Education and Technology 3: 7-15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linn, M. C., and Hsi, S. (2000). Computers, Teachers, Peers: Science Learning Partners, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linn, M. C., and Muilenberg, L. (1996). Creating lifelong science learners: What models form a firm foundation? Educational Researcher 25: 18-24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linn, M. C., Songer, N. B., and Lewis, E. L. (1991). Overview: Students' models and epistemologies of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 28: 729-732.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monaghan, J. M., and Clement, J. (1999). Use of a computer simulation to devlop mental simulations for learning relative motion concepts. International Journal of Science Education 21(9): 921-944.

    Google Scholar 

  • Penner, D. E., Giles, N. D., Lehrer, R., and Schauble, L. (1997). Building functional models: designing an elbow. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34(2):125-143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perkins, D. (1986). Knowledge as Design, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry, W. G. (1970). Forms of Intellectual and Ethical Development in the College Years: A Scheme. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perkins, D. N., Jay, E., and Tishman, S. (1993). Beyond abilities: A dispositional theory of thinking. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly 39: 1-21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ploger, D., and Della Vedova, T. (1999). Dynamic charts in the elementary classroom. Learning and Leading With Technology 26: 38-41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plummer, C., and McGeary, D. (1996). Physical Geology, Wm. C. Brown Publishers, Dubuque, IA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raghavan, K., and Glaser, R. (1995). Model-based analysis and reasoning in science: The MARS curriculum. Science Education 79: 37-61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rukavina, I. (1991). The Effect of Knowledge-Building Approach on Advancing Learning in Science, Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rukavina, I., and Daneman, M. (1996). Integration and its effects on acquiring knowledge about competing scientific theories from text. Journal of Educational Psychology 88: 272-287.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scardamalia, M., McLean, R. S., Swallow, J., and Woodruff, E. (1989). Computer-supported intentional learning environments. Journal of Educational Computing Research 5(1): 51-68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schommer, M. (1990). Effects of beliefs about the nature of knowledge on comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology 82: 498-504.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schommer, M. (1993). Epistemological development and academic performance among secondary students. Journal of Educational Psychology 85: 406-411.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schommer-Aikins, M. (2002). An evolving theoretical framework for an epistemological belief system. In Hofer, B., and Pintrich, P. (Eds.), Personal Epistemology: The Psychology of Beliefs About Knowledge and Knowing, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz, C., and White, B. (1999). What do seventh grade students understand about scientific modeling from a model-oriented physics curriculum? Presented at the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Boston, MA, March 28–31, 1999.

  • Slotta, J., Linn, M. C., Gobert, J., and Pallant, A. (2001). Collaborative design of WISE Collaborative Inquiry Curriculum: A case study. Submitted to Computer Supported Collaborative Learning, Boulder, CO, January 2001.

  • Smith, C., Maclin, D., Houghton, C., and Hennessy, M. G. (1999). Can 6th-grade students develop a coherent constructivist epistemology of science: A comparative study. Presented at the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Boston, MA, March 28–31, 1999.

  • Smith, C., and Wenk, L. (2003). The relation among three aspects of College Freshman's epistemology of science. Presented at the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Philadelphia, PA, March 26, 2003.

  • Songer, N. B. (1989). Promoting integration of instructed and natural world knowledge in thermodynamics. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation. University of California, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Songer, N. B., and Linn, M. C. (1991). How do students' views of science influence knowledge integration? Journal of Research in Science Teaching 28: 761-784.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Dijk, T., and Kintsch, W. (1983). Strategies of Discourse Comprehension. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, B. (1993). ThinkerTools: Causal models, conceptual change, and science education. Cognition and Instruction 10: 1-100.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, B., and Frederiksen, J. (1990). Causal model progressions as a foundation for intelligent learning environments. Artificial Intelligence 24: 99-157.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, B. Y., and Frederiksen, J. R. (1998). Inquiry, modeling, and metacognition: Making science accessible to all students. Cognition and Instruction 16(1): 3-118.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. The Concord Consortium, 10 Concord Crossing, Suite 300, Concord, Massachusetts, 01742

    Janice D. Gobert & Amy Pallant

Authors
  1. Janice D. Gobert
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Amy Pallant
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Janice D. Gobert.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gobert, J.D., Pallant, A. Fostering Students' Epistemologies of Models via Authentic Model-Based Tasks. Journal of Science Education and Technology 13, 7–22 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOST.0000019635.70068.6f

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOST.0000019635.70068.6f

Search

Navigation