Advertisement

Journal of Scheduling

, Volume 7, Issue 5, pp 333–348 | Cite as

Minimizing Makespan in a Two-Machine Flow Shop with Delays and Unit-Time Operations is NP-Hard

  • Wenci Yu
  • Han HoogeveenEmail author
  • Jan Karel Lenstra
Article

Abstract

One of the first problems to be studied in scheduling theory was the problem of minimizing the makespan in a two-machine flow shop. Johnson showed that this problem can be solved in O(n log n) time. A crucial assumption here is that the time needed to move a job from the first to the second machine is negligible. If this is not the case and if this ‘delay’ is not equal for all jobs, then the problem becomes NP-hard in the strong sense. We show that this is even the case if all processing times are equal to one. As a consequence, we show strong NP-hardness of a number of similar problems, including a severely restricted version of the Numerical 3-Dimensional Matching problem.

flow shop scheduling intermediate delays makespan computational complexity strong NP-hardness 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Coster, M. J., Private communication, 1993.Google Scholar
  2. Dell'Amico, M., “Shop problems with two machines and time lags,” Operations Research, 44, 777–787 (1996).Google Scholar
  3. Dell'Amico, M. and R. J. M. Vaessens, “Flow and open shop scheduling on two machines with transportation times and machine-independent processing times is NP-hard,” Materiali di discussione 141, Dipartimento di Economia Politica, Universit`a di Modena, 1996.Google Scholar
  4. Garey, M. R. and D. S. Johnson, Computers and Intractability: A Guide to the Theory of NP-Completeness. Freeman, San Francisco, 1979.Google Scholar
  5. Graham, R. L., E. L. Lawler, J. K. Lenstra, and A. H. G. Rinnooy Kan, Optimization and approximation in deterministic sequencing and scheduling: A survey. Annals of Discrete Mathematics, 5, 287–326 (1979).Google Scholar
  6. Hoogeveen, J. A., J. K. Lenstra, and S. L. van de Velde, “Sequencing and scheduling,” inM. Dell'Amico, F. Maffioli, and S. Martello (eds.), Annotated Bibliographies in Combinatorial Optimization, Wiley, Chichester, 1997, Ch. 12.Google Scholar
  7. Johnson, S. M., “Optimal two-and three-stage production schedules with setup times included,” Naval Research Logistics Quarterly, 1, 61–68 (1954).Google Scholar
  8. Johnson, S. M., “Discussion: Sequencing njobs on two machines with arbitrary time-lags.” Management Science, 5, 299–303 (1958).Google Scholar
  9. Kern, W. and W. M. Nawijn, “Scheduling multi-operation jobs with time lags on a single machine,” in U. Faigle and C. Hoede (eds.), Proceedings 2nd Twente Workshop on Graphs and Combinatorial Optimization, Enschede, 1991.Google Scholar
  10. Lenstra, J. K. Private communication, 1991.Google Scholar
  11. Mitten, L. G., “Sequencing njobs on two machines with arbitrary time-lags,” Management Science, 5, 293–298 (1958).Google Scholar
  12. Orman, A. J. and C. N. Potts, “On the complexity of coupled-task scheduling,” Discrete Applied Mathematics, 72, 141–154 (1997).Google Scholar
  13. Yu, W., The Two-Machine Flow Shop Problem with Delays and the One-Machine Total Tardiness Problem, PhD Thesis, Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, Technische Universiteit Eindhoven, 1996.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Applied Mathematics InstituteEast China University of Science and TechnologyShanghaiChina
  2. 2.Department of Computer ScienceUtrecht UniversityUtrechtThe Netherlands
  3. 3.CWIAmsterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations