Skip to main content
Log in

Comprehension of Idioms by Children with Learning Disabilities: Metaphoric Transparency and Syntactic Frozenness

  • Published:
Journal of Psycholinguistic Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Third and fifth grade children with and without learning disabilities participated in this study. Syntactically frozen and flexible idioms and transparent and opaque idioms were used as stimuli to examine the ability to identify the correct idiom and to explain idiom meanings. Grade and diagnostic category affected performance on the explanation task but not on the forced choice task. Idiom type was also a factor affecting comprehension and explanation. Literal responses occurred rarely and were more likely to occur on the forced choice task.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abrahamsen, E., & Sprouse, P. (1995). Fable comprehension by children with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 28(5), 302-308.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ackerman, B. P. (1982). On comprehending idioms: Do children get the picture? Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 33, 439-454.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ammer, C. (1997). The American Dictionary of Idioms. New York: Houghton–Mifflin Company.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Baechle, C. L., & Lian, M. J. (1990). The effects of direct feedback and practice on metaphor performance in children with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 23, 451-455.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Blue, C. M. (1981). Types of utterances to avoid when speaking to language impaired children. Language, Speech and Hearing Services in the Schools, 12, 120-124.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Brown, L., Sherbenou, R. J., & Johnsen, S. K. (1990). Test of Nonverbal Intelligence: A Language free Measure of Cognitive Ability, 2nd ed.. Austin, TX: ProEd.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cacciari, C., & Levorato, M. C. (1989). How children understand idioms in discourse. Journal of Child Language, 16, 387-405.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Dunn, L. M., & Dunn, L. M. (1981). Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test-Revised. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Fry, E. (1968). A readability formula that saves time. Journal of Reading, 11, 513-578.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gibbs, R. W. (1987). Linguistic factors in children's understanding of idioms. Journal of Child Language, 14, 569-586.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Gibbs, R. W. (1991). Semantic analyzability in children's understanding of idioms. American Speech Language Hearing Association, 34, 613-620.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Gibbs, R. W., & Gonzales, G. P. (1985). Syntactic frozenness in processing and remembering idioms. Cognition, 20, 243-259.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Gibbs, R. W., Nayak, N. P., Bolton, J. L., & Keppel, M. E. (1989a). Speakers' assumptions about the lexical flexibility of idioms. Memory and Cognition, 17(1), 58-68.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Gibbs, R. W., Nayak, N. P., & Cutting, C. (1989b). How to kick the bucket and not decompose: Analyzability and idiom processing. Journal of Memory and Language, 28, 576-593.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lee, R. F., & Kahmi, A. G. (1990). Metaphoric competence in children with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 23, 476-452.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Levorato, M. 1993. The acquisition of idioms and the development of figurative competence. In C. Cacciari, & P. Tabossi (Eds.), Idioms: Processing, Structure, and Interpretation (pp. 101-128). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Lutzer, V. D. (1988). Comprehension of proverbs by average children and children with learning disorders. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 21, 104-108.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Nippold, M. A. (1985). Comprehension of figurative language in youth. Topics in Language Disorders, 5, 1-20.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Nippold, M. A. (1991). Evaluating and enhancing idiom comprehension in language-disordered students. Language, Speech and Hearing Services in the Schools, 22, 100-106.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Nippold, M. A., & Martin, S. T. (1989). Idiom interpretation in isolation versus context: A developmental study with adolescents. Journal of Speech and Language Research, 32, 59-66.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Prinz, P. M. (1983). The development of idiomatic meaning in children. Language and Speech, 26, 2263-2272.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Seidenberg, P. L., & Bernstein, D. K. (1986). The comprehension of similes and metaphors by learning disabled and nonlearning disabled children. Language, Speech and Hearing Services in the Schools, 17, 219-229.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Secord, W., & Wiig, E. (1993). Interpreting figurative language expressions. Folia Folia Phoniatrics, 45, 1-9.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Wiig, E., & Secord, W. (1989). Test of Language Competence: Administration Manual. San Antonio, Texas: Psychological Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eileen P. Abrahamsen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Abrahamsen, E.P., Burke-Williams, D. Comprehension of Idioms by Children with Learning Disabilities: Metaphoric Transparency and Syntactic Frozenness. J Psycholinguist Res 33, 203–215 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOPR.0000027962.42590.60

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOPR.0000027962.42590.60

Navigation