Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Another Look at the Role of Empty Categories in Sentence Processing (and Grammar)

  • Published:
Journal of Psycholinguistic Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The gap/gapless processing debate in the psycholinguistics literature contrasts two processing models: one that assumes the trace-based Government and Binding (or Principles and Parameters) Grammar and the (augmented) Active Filler Strategy and one that assumes the traceless Dependency Categorial Grammar and the Principle of Dependency Formation. This paper reports on an experiment that found new evidence against the gapless/traceless model, considers why such evidence was not found in previous studies, and explores whether a parser that combines a (partially) traceless grammar and the augmented Active Filler Strategy can explain the current finding.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Bever, T., & McElree, B. (1988). Empty categories access their antecedents during comprehension. Linguistic Inquiry, 19, 35-45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berwick, R. C., & Weinberg, A. S. (1984). The Grammatical Basis of Linguistic Performance: Language Use and Acquisition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouma, G., Malouf, R., & Sag, I. A. (2001). Satisfying constraints on extraction and adjunction. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 19, 1-65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clahsen, H., & Featherston, S. (1999). Antecedent priming at trace positions: Evidence from German scrambling. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 28, 415-437.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clifton, C., Jr., & De Vincenzi, M. (1990). Comprehending sentences with empty elements. In D. A. Balota, G. B. Flores d'Arcais, & K. Rayner (Eds.), Comprehension Processes in Reading (pp. 265-283). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clifton, C., Jr., & Frazier, L. (1989). Comprehending sentences with long-distance dependencies. In G. Carlson, & M. Tanenhaus (Eds.), Linguistic Structure in Language Processing (pp. 94-128). Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. D., MacWhinney, B., Flatt, M., & Provost, J. (1993). PsyScope: A new graphic interactive environment for designing psychological experiments. Behavioral Research Methods, Instruments and Computers, 25, 257-271.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crocker, M. W. (1994). On the nature of the principle-based sentence processor. In C. Clifton, Jr., L. Frazier, & K. Rayner (Eds.), Perspectives on Sentence Processing (pp. 245-266). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crocker, M. W. (1996). Computational Psycholinguistics: An Interdisciplinary Approach to the Study of Language. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Vincenzi, M. (1991). Syntactic Parsing Strategies in Italian. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emonds, J. E. (1976). A transformational approach to English syntax: Root, Structure-Preserving, and Local Transformations. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferreira, F., & Henderson, J. (1991). Recovery from misanalyses of garden-path sentences. Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 725-745.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fodor, J. D. (1989). Empty categories in sentence processing. Language and Cognitive Processes, 4, 155-209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fodor, J. D. (1991). Sentence processing and the mental grammar. In P. Sells, S. M. Shieber, & T. Wasow (Eds.), Foundational Issues in Natural Language Processing (pp. 83-113). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fodor, J. D. (1993). Processing empty categories: A question of visibility. In G. Altmann, & R. Shillcock (Eds.), Cognitive Models of Speech Processing: The Second Sperlonga Meeting (pp. 351-400). Hove: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fodor, J. D. (1995). Comprehending sentence structure. In L. R. Gleitman, & M. Liberman (Eds.), Language: An Invitation to Cognitive Science (pp. 209-246). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frazier, L., & Clifton, C., Jr. (1989). Successive cyclicity in the grammar and parser. Language and Cognitive Processes, 4, 93-126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frazier, L., & Flores d'Arcais, G. B. (1989). Filler-driven parsing: A study of gap filling in Dutch. Journal of Memory and Language, 28, 331-344.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frazier, L., & Rayner, K. (1982). Making and correcting errors during sentence comprehension: Eye movements in the analysis of structurally ambiguous sentences. Cognitive Psychology, 14, 178-210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gazdar, G. (1981). Unbounded dependencies and coordinate structure. Linguistic Inquiry, 12, 155-184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, E., & Hickok, G. (1993). Sentence processing with empty categories. Language and Cognitive Processes, 8, 147-161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, E., Hickok, G., & Schütze, C. T. (1994). Processing empty categories: A parallel approach. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 23, 381-405.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorrell, P. (1993). Evaluating the direct association hypothesis: A reply to Pickering and Barry (1991). Language and Cognitive Processes, 8, 129-146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorrell, P. (1998). Syntactic analysis and reanalysis in sentence processing. In J. D. Fodor, & F. Ferreira (Eds.), Reanalysis in Sentence Processing (pp. 201-245).Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grodzinsky, Y. (2000). The neurology of syntax: Language use without Broca's area. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23, 47-117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins, J. A. (1999). Processing complexity and filler-gap dependencies across grammars. Language, 75, 244-285.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hickok, G., Canseco-Gonzalez, E., Zurif, E., & Grimshaw, J. (1992). Modularity in locating gaps. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 21, 545-561.

    Google Scholar 

  • Just, M. A., Carpenter, P. A., & Woolley, J. D. (1982). Paradigms and processes in reading comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 111, 228-238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keenan, E. L., & Comrie, B. (1977). Noun phrase accessibility and universal grammar. Linguistic Inquiry, 8, 63-100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keenan, E. L., & Hawkins, S. (1986). The psychological validity of the Accessibility Hierarchy. In E. L. Keenan, Universal Grammar: 15 Essays (pp. 60-85). London: Croom Helm.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacDonald, M. C. (1989). Priming effects from gaps to antecedents. Language and Cognitive Processes, 4, 35-56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maling, J. (2000). A simple argument for subject gaps. In Y. Grodzinsky, L. P. Shapiro, & D. Swinney (Eds.), Language and the Brain: Representation and Processing (pp. 351-355). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicol, J., & Swinney, D. (1989). The role of structure in coreference assignment during sentence comprehension. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 18, 5-20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pickering, M. J. (1993). Direct association and sentence processing: A reply to Gorrell and to Gibson and Hickok. Language and Cognitive Processes, 8, 163-196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pickering, M. J. (1994). Processing local and unbounded dependencies: A unified account. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 23, 323-352.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pickering, M. J., & Barry, G. (1991). Sentence processing without empty categories. Language and Cognitive Processes, 6, 229-259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pickering, M. J., & Shillcock, R. (1992). Processing subject extractions. In H. Goodluck, & M. Rochemont (Eds.), Island Constraints: Theory, Acquisition and Processing (pp. 295-320). Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, I. (1997). Comparative Syntax. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sag, I. A., & Fodor, J. D. (1995). Extraction without traces. In R. Aranovich, W. Byrne, S. Preuss, & M. Senturia (Eds.), WCCFL 13: The Proceedings of the 13th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics (pp. 365-384). Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson, S. (1993). Establishing long-distance dependencies in a hybrid network model of human parsing. In Cognitive Science Society(Ed.), Proceedings of the 15th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 982-987). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stowe, L. A. (1986). Parsing WH-constructions: Evidence for on-line gap location. Language and Cognitive Processes, 1, 227-245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swinney, D., & Zurif, E. (1995). Syntactic processing in aphasia. Brain and Language, 50, 225-239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanenhaus, M. K., Boland, J. E., Garnsey, S. M. & Carlson, G. N. (1989). Lexical structure in parsing long-distance dependencies. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 18, 37-50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warner, J., & Glass, A. L. (1987). Context and distance-to-disambiguation effects in ambiguity resolution: Evidence from grammaticality judgments of garden-path sentences. Journal of Memory and Language, 26, 714-738.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zurif, E., Swinney, D., Prather, P., Solomon, J., & Bushell, C. (1993). An on-line analysis of syntactic processing in Broca's and Wernicke's aphasia. Brain and Language, 45, 448-464.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Research Centre for English and Applied Linguistics, University of Cambridge, Keynes House, Trumpington Street, Cambridge, CB2 1QA, United Kingdom

    Ming-Wei Lee

Authors
  1. Ming-Wei Lee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lee, MW. Another Look at the Role of Empty Categories in Sentence Processing (and Grammar). J Psycholinguist Res 33, 51–73 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOPR.0000010514.50468.30

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOPR.0000010514.50468.30

Search

Navigation