Abstract
The application of magnetic flux leakage (MFL) methods to the nondestructive evaluation (NDE) of metal parts has been known for several decades. The inspection of large-diameter cables (Ø ≥ 100 mm), such as bridge stay cables, is a new field of application for the MFL method. The large cross-section of the cables requires the generation of strong magnetic fields in order to obtain the induction fields necessary for an accurate inspection of the cables. A new device for the inspection of stay cables has been developed in order to meet the requirements given by the size of the cables. Measurements performed with the developed device on full-scale specimens in the laboratory and first calculations confirm the validity of the MFL approach to the inspection of bridge stay cables. The equipment was used satisfactorily in 2001 for the NDE inspection of the 68 locked coil stay cables (121 mm < Ø < 167 mm) of a bridge in Southeast Asia. For such cables, no exact localization within the cross section was performed. Thus far, an accurate indication of the position of the detected flaws along the length of the cables could be given. A qualitative statement about position and size of the flaws within the cross section of the cable could also be made. Given the large steel cross-section of the cables, no other nondestructive method to confirm the findings could be applied to assess the exact size and position of the detected flaws. The proposed analytical method presented in this paper makes it possible to increase the amount of information that can be extracted from the measured MFL data with regard to the exact location of the detected flaws within a cross section of a stay cable.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Reference
F. Förster, New findings in the field of non-destructive magnetic leakage field inspection, NDT Int., 19:3-14 (1986).
H. R. Weischedel, The inspection of wire ropes in service: A critical review, Mater. Eval., 43:1592-1605 (1985).
R. K. Stanley, Simple explanation of the theory of the total magnetic-flux method for the measurement of ferromagnetic cross-sections, Mater. Eval., 53:72-75 (1995).
S. Mandayam, L. Udpa, S. S. Udpa, and W. Lord, Wavelet-based permeability compensation technique for characterizing magnetic flux leakage images, NDTE Int., 30:297-303 (1997).
A. Bergamini, Nondestructive testing of stay cables, In Proc. IABSE Conf. On Suspended Bridges, Seoul, Korea, CD ROM, IABSE (2001).
A. Bergamini, Nondestructive testing of stay cables—field experience in South East Asia, Proc. 3WCSC, Como, Italy Wiley, 2002.
J. C. Slater and N. H. Frank, Electromagnetism, Revised Edition (Dover Publications, New York, 1969), pp. 75-77.
V. E. Shcherbinin and N. N. Zatsepin, Calculation of the magnetostatic field of surface defects. I. Field topography of defect models, Defectoscopy, 5:385-393 (1966).
V. E. Shcherbinin and N. N. Zatsepin, Calculation of the magnetostatic field of surface defects. II. Experimental verification of the principal theoretical relationships, Defectoscopy, 5:394-399 (1966).
O. Karlqvist, Calculation of the magnetic field in the ferromagnetic layer of a magnetic drum, In Transactions of the Royal Institute of Technology (Elanders Boktryckeri Aktiebolag, Göteborg, 1954).
D. Minkov, J. Lee, and T. Shoji, Study of crack inversions utilizing dipole model of a crack and Hall element measurements, J. Magn. Magn. Mater., 217:207-215 (2000).
L. J. Swartzendruber, Magnetic leakage and force fields for artificial defects in magnetic particle test rings, In Proceedings of the XII Symposium on NDE. (SWRI, San Antonio, TX, 1979), pp. 150-161.
L. J. Swartzendruber, Comments on the calibration and use of the NIST test ring (SRM 1853), Mater. Eval., 6:594-596 (1999).
D. E. Bray and R. K. Stanley, Nondestructive Evaluation, Revised Edition (CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 1997), pp. 303-310.
D. M. Bates and D. G. Watts, Nonlinear Regression Analysis and Its Applications (John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1988).
D. A. Ratkowsky, Nonlinear Regression Modeling, A Unified Practical Approach (Marcel Dekker, New York, 1983).
D. L. Atherton and W. Czura, Finite element calculations on the effects of permeability variation on magnetic flux leakage signals, NDT Int., 20:239-241 (1987).
D. L. Atherton and M. G. Daly, Finite element calculation of magnetic flux leakage detector signals, NDT Int., 20:235-238 (1987).
L. Luming, Z. Jiajun, L. Zhenxing, and S. Xiaoyan, Using finite element method to optimize magnetic flux leakage testing, In Proceedings of the 14th World Conference on Non-Destructive Testing (New Dehli, 1996), pp. 1589-1592 (Ashgate Publishing Company, Aldershot, U.K.).
J. P. Webb and B. Forghani, DC current distributions and magnetic fields using the T-omega edge-element method, IEEE Trans Magnetics, 31:1444-1447 (1995).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Christen, R., Bergamini, A. & Motavalli, M. Three-Dimensional Localization of Defects in Stay Cables Using Magnetic Flux Leakage Methods. Journal of Nondestructive Evaluation 22, 93–101 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JONE.0000010736.74285.b6
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JONE.0000010736.74285.b6