Abstract
It has always been assumed that the roton in 4He had to do with local vorticity—hence the name! We present here an alternate view: the roton is viewed as a “soft mode”, precursor of a crystallization instability. In such a picture the liquid is “nearly solid”, and the long observed similarities of heat propagation in liquid and solid phases are naturally explained. In this qualitative paper we consider three models successively. A lattice gas with one atom per site displays a Mott localization transition, as shown by the Bangalore group. The important result is the vanishing of the superfluid order parameter (condensate fraction N o) at the transition. There is no breakdown of translational symmetry and consequently no soft mode. Another lattice model with half filling, with an added nearest neighbour repulsion, was studied by Matsubara and Matsuda in the early 1950s it displays a first order transition between a superfluid and a localized charge density wave state. The excitation spectrum has a soft mode at zone edge near the transition, signalling the proximity of the CDW instability. Finally, we consider the realistic situation of a continuous system with no preexisting lattice. We approach the problem from the limit N o = 0 instead of the ideal gas N o = N. When N o = 0 the quasiparticle spectrum and the charge density spectrum are decoupled. The latter should have a soft mode ω=ωm if crystallization is close. That soft mode is a normal state property that has nothing to do with superfluidity. A small N o acts to hybridize quasiparticles and density fluctuations: the resulting anticrossing lowers ωm 2 as well as the ground state energy. We show that N o is bounded for two reasons: (i) if ω m 2 turns negative, the liquid is unstable towards freezing (ii) depletion due to quantum fluctuation exceeds N o if the latter is too large. The resulting upper bound noindent for N/N o is ≪ 1, a consequence of the deep roton minimum. The whole paper is qualitative, based on outrageous simplifications in order to make algebra tractable.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
R.P. Feynman in "Progress in Low Temperature Physics ",Vol.1,C.G. Gorter (ed.), North Holland (1955),Chapter 2.
T.D. Kühner, S.R White,and H. Monien,Phys.Rev.B61,12474 (2000).I am grateful to Prof.Th.Giamarchi for drawing my attention to that work:a detailed discussion will appear in his forthcoming book on one dimensional quantum systems.
R.P. Feynman and M. Cohen,Phys.Rev.102,1189 (1956)
T. Schneider and C.P. Enz,Phys.Rev.Lett.27,1186 (1971).
A.D. Jackson, B.K. Jennings, R.A. Smith and A. Lande,Phys.Rev.B 24,105 (1981).
V. Apaja, J. Halinen,and M. Saarela,J.Low Temp.Phys.113,909 (1998),Phys.Rev.B 57,5358 (1998).
K. Sheshadri, H.R. Krishnamurthy, R. Pandit,and T.V. Ramakrishnan,Europhys.Lett. 22,257 (1993).
P.W. Anderson in "Basic Notions of Condensed Matter Physics ",Benjamin-Cummings Publishing Company (1984),p.143 ff.
T. Matsubara and K. Matsuda,Prog.Theoret.Phys.16,569 (1956).That model has been taken again and again,mostly in search of a super-solid:see for instance K.Matsuda and T.Tsuneto,Prog.Theoret.Phys.Suppl.46,411 (1970),and an extensive analysis by K.S.Liu and M.E.Fisher,Prog.Low Temp.Phys.10,655 (1973).
See the recent paper of J. Beamish, Nature 427 ,204 (2004).
S.T. Beliaev, Sov. Phys. JETP 7 ,289 (1958).
N.M. Hugenholtz and D. Pines,Phys. Rev.116,489 (1959).
S.A. Brazovski,Sov.Phys.JETP 45,85 (1975).S.A.Brazovski,I.E.Dyaloshinskii,and A.R.Muratov,Sov.Phys.JETP 66,625 (1987).
F. Werner, G. Beaume, A. Hobeika, S. Nascimbene, C. Herrmann, F. Caupin,and S. Ba-libar,J.Low Temp.Phys.136,93 (2004).
T.J. Greytak, R. Woerner, J. Yan,and R. Benjamin,Phys.Rev.Lett.25,1547 (1970).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Nozières, P. Is the Roton in Superfluid 4He the Ghost of a Bragg Spot?. Journal of Low Temperature Physics 137, 45–67 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOLT.0000044234.82957.2f
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOLT.0000044234.82957.2f